由内到外与全内半月板修复装置在人体模型中的医源性缺陷比较

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
David A. Calafiore M.D. , Robert A. Magnussen M.D., M.P.H. , Joshua S. Everhart M.D., M.P.H. , Alex C. DiBartola M.D., M.P.H. , Eric M. Milliron M.D. , Christopher C. Kaeding M.D. , David C. Flanigan M.D.
{"title":"由内到外与全内半月板修复装置在人体模型中的医源性缺陷比较","authors":"David A. Calafiore M.D. ,&nbsp;Robert A. Magnussen M.D., M.P.H. ,&nbsp;Joshua S. Everhart M.D., M.P.H. ,&nbsp;Alex C. DiBartola M.D., M.P.H. ,&nbsp;Eric M. Milliron M.D. ,&nbsp;Christopher C. Kaeding M.D. ,&nbsp;David C. Flanigan M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2022.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>(1) To investigate the pattern and diameter of the iatrogenic defect that meniscal repair devices impose on meniscal tissue and (2) to determine whether repair-induced defect patterns or diameters differ across devices.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Sixty-one fresh frozen human cadaveric menisci were used (n = 9; eliminated). All-inside devices (n = 9) included ULTRA FAST-FIX, FAST-FIX 360, Depuy Mitek 0° and 12° TRUESPAN, ConMed Sequent, Zimmer Biomet<span><span> JuggerStitch, Stryker IvyAIR, Arthrex FiberStitch and Meniscal Cinch II. Inside-out needles (n = 4) included ConMed HiFi, Depuy Mitek ORTHOCORD, Arthrex-2-0 FiberWire, and Stryker SharpShooter. Following </span>India Ink<span> staining, implant devices were inserted into cadaveric menisci. Samples were fixed in formalin solution and imaged with a high-resolution camera. Defects were classified by qualitative evaluation. Defect and needle diameter were quantified with software assistance. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance testing.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We analyzed 644 iatrogenic defects with mean defect diameter of 1.96 mm (standard deviation 0.86). For all-inside devices, defect patterns (n = 436) were 15.6% linear, 38.1% semilunar, 46.3% stellate, while inside-out devices (n = 208) were 95.7% stellate, 4.3% linear, and 0.0% semilunar. All-inside devices had mean defect diameter of 2.46 mm, while inside-out meniscus needles had mean 0.90 mm defect diameter (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). FasT-FIX 360, ULTRA-FAST-FIX, and Arthrex Meniscal Cinch II induced smaller diameter defects than other all-inside devices (F = 20.2, <em>P</em> &lt; .05). Strong positive correlation was found comparing outer needle diameter and mean defect diameters across all devices (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9447).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Needles utilized in meniscal implant systems produce the following basic defect patterns: stellate (62.3%), semilunar (25.8%), and linear (11.9%). A strong positive correlation was found between mean defect size and outer needle diameter across all devices. Inside-out double-armed flexible needles produced significantly smaller defects than all-inside devices. Of the all-inside devices, ULTRA FAST-FIX, FAST-FIX 360, and Arthrex Meniscal Cinch II produced smaller defects on average.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><p>While the true clinical impact of these findings cannot be drawn from the present study, this investigation provides necessary context to better understand reported similarities and differences in healing rates and outcomes between inside-out and all-inside repair techniques.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"38 11","pages":"Pages 3070-3079.e3"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smaller Iatrogenic Defects Created by Inside-Out Compared With All-Inside Meniscus Repair Devices in Human Cadaveric Model\",\"authors\":\"David A. Calafiore M.D. ,&nbsp;Robert A. Magnussen M.D., M.P.H. ,&nbsp;Joshua S. Everhart M.D., M.P.H. ,&nbsp;Alex C. DiBartola M.D., M.P.H. ,&nbsp;Eric M. Milliron M.D. ,&nbsp;Christopher C. Kaeding M.D. ,&nbsp;David C. Flanigan M.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arthro.2022.05.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>(1) To investigate the pattern and diameter of the iatrogenic defect that meniscal repair devices impose on meniscal tissue and (2) to determine whether repair-induced defect patterns or diameters differ across devices.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Sixty-one fresh frozen human cadaveric menisci were used (n = 9; eliminated). All-inside devices (n = 9) included ULTRA FAST-FIX, FAST-FIX 360, Depuy Mitek 0° and 12° TRUESPAN, ConMed Sequent, Zimmer Biomet<span><span> JuggerStitch, Stryker IvyAIR, Arthrex FiberStitch and Meniscal Cinch II. Inside-out needles (n = 4) included ConMed HiFi, Depuy Mitek ORTHOCORD, Arthrex-2-0 FiberWire, and Stryker SharpShooter. Following </span>India Ink<span> staining, implant devices were inserted into cadaveric menisci. Samples were fixed in formalin solution and imaged with a high-resolution camera. Defects were classified by qualitative evaluation. Defect and needle diameter were quantified with software assistance. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance testing.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We analyzed 644 iatrogenic defects with mean defect diameter of 1.96 mm (standard deviation 0.86). For all-inside devices, defect patterns (n = 436) were 15.6% linear, 38.1% semilunar, 46.3% stellate, while inside-out devices (n = 208) were 95.7% stellate, 4.3% linear, and 0.0% semilunar. All-inside devices had mean defect diameter of 2.46 mm, while inside-out meniscus needles had mean 0.90 mm defect diameter (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). FasT-FIX 360, ULTRA-FAST-FIX, and Arthrex Meniscal Cinch II induced smaller diameter defects than other all-inside devices (F = 20.2, <em>P</em> &lt; .05). Strong positive correlation was found comparing outer needle diameter and mean defect diameters across all devices (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9447).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Needles utilized in meniscal implant systems produce the following basic defect patterns: stellate (62.3%), semilunar (25.8%), and linear (11.9%). A strong positive correlation was found between mean defect size and outer needle diameter across all devices. Inside-out double-armed flexible needles produced significantly smaller defects than all-inside devices. Of the all-inside devices, ULTRA FAST-FIX, FAST-FIX 360, and Arthrex Meniscal Cinch II produced smaller defects on average.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><p>While the true clinical impact of these findings cannot be drawn from the present study, this investigation provides necessary context to better understand reported similarities and differences in healing rates and outcomes between inside-out and all-inside repair techniques.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"volume\":\"38 11\",\"pages\":\"Pages 3070-3079.e3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806322003309\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806322003309","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的(1)研究半月板修复装置对半月板组织造成的医源性缺损的形态和直径;(2)确定修复引起的缺损形态和直径在不同的半月板修复装置之间是否存在差异。方法采用新鲜冷冻人尸体半月板61例(n = 9;消除)。全内嵌装置(n = 9)包括ULTRA FAST-FIX, FAST-FIX 360, Depuy Mitek 0°和12°TRUESPAN, ConMed sequence, Zimmer Biomet JuggerStitch, Stryker IvyAIR, Arthrex FiberStitch和Meniscal Cinch II。由内到外的针头(n = 4)包括ConMed HiFi、Depuy Mitek ORTHOCORD、Arthrex-2-0 FiberWire和Stryker SharpShooter。墨迹染色后,将植入装置插入尸体半月板。样品固定在福尔马林溶液中,用高分辨率相机成像。通过定性评价对缺陷进行分类。在软件辅助下对缺陷和针径进行量化。采用方差分析检验进行统计分析。结果共分析医源性缺损644例,平均缺损直径1.96 mm(标准差0.86)。对于全内式装置,缺陷模式(n = 436)为15.6%线性,38.1%半月形,46.3%星状,而内外式装置(n = 208)为95.7%星状,4.3%线性,0.0%半月形。全内针的平均缺陷直径为2.46 mm,而由内到外半月板针的平均缺陷直径为0.90 mm (P <措施)。FasT-FIX 360、ULTRA-FAST-FIX和Arthrex Meniscal Cinch II比其他全内嵌装置诱导的直径缺陷更小(F = 20.2, P <. 05)。所有器械的外针直径与平均缺陷直径呈正相关(R2 = 0.9447)。结论在半月板植入系统中使用的针会产生以下几种基本的缺陷类型:星形(62.3%)、半月形(25.8%)和线形(11.9%)。在所有装置中,平均缺陷大小与外针直径之间存在很强的正相关。由内而外的双臂柔性针产生的缺陷明显小于由内而外的装置。在全内置式装置中,ULTRA FAST-FIX、FAST-FIX 360和Arthrex Meniscal Cinch II平均产生较小的缺陷。临床相关性虽然这些发现的真正临床影响不能从目前的研究中得出,但这项调查提供了必要的背景,以更好地理解报道的愈合率和愈合结果在由内而外和全内修复技术之间的异同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Smaller Iatrogenic Defects Created by Inside-Out Compared With All-Inside Meniscus Repair Devices in Human Cadaveric Model

Purpose

(1) To investigate the pattern and diameter of the iatrogenic defect that meniscal repair devices impose on meniscal tissue and (2) to determine whether repair-induced defect patterns or diameters differ across devices.

Methods

Sixty-one fresh frozen human cadaveric menisci were used (n = 9; eliminated). All-inside devices (n = 9) included ULTRA FAST-FIX, FAST-FIX 360, Depuy Mitek 0° and 12° TRUESPAN, ConMed Sequent, Zimmer Biomet JuggerStitch, Stryker IvyAIR, Arthrex FiberStitch and Meniscal Cinch II. Inside-out needles (n = 4) included ConMed HiFi, Depuy Mitek ORTHOCORD, Arthrex-2-0 FiberWire, and Stryker SharpShooter. Following India Ink staining, implant devices were inserted into cadaveric menisci. Samples were fixed in formalin solution and imaged with a high-resolution camera. Defects were classified by qualitative evaluation. Defect and needle diameter were quantified with software assistance. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance testing.

Results

We analyzed 644 iatrogenic defects with mean defect diameter of 1.96 mm (standard deviation 0.86). For all-inside devices, defect patterns (n = 436) were 15.6% linear, 38.1% semilunar, 46.3% stellate, while inside-out devices (n = 208) were 95.7% stellate, 4.3% linear, and 0.0% semilunar. All-inside devices had mean defect diameter of 2.46 mm, while inside-out meniscus needles had mean 0.90 mm defect diameter (P < .001). FasT-FIX 360, ULTRA-FAST-FIX, and Arthrex Meniscal Cinch II induced smaller diameter defects than other all-inside devices (F = 20.2, P < .05). Strong positive correlation was found comparing outer needle diameter and mean defect diameters across all devices (R2 = 0.9447).

Conclusions

Needles utilized in meniscal implant systems produce the following basic defect patterns: stellate (62.3%), semilunar (25.8%), and linear (11.9%). A strong positive correlation was found between mean defect size and outer needle diameter across all devices. Inside-out double-armed flexible needles produced significantly smaller defects than all-inside devices. Of the all-inside devices, ULTRA FAST-FIX, FAST-FIX 360, and Arthrex Meniscal Cinch II produced smaller defects on average.

Clinical Relevance

While the true clinical impact of these findings cannot be drawn from the present study, this investigation provides necessary context to better understand reported similarities and differences in healing rates and outcomes between inside-out and all-inside repair techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信