家庭医学科质量改进能力:一项混合方法研究。

Lauren Oshman, Taylor Walton, Paul Schultz, Robin Barry, Linda Speer
{"title":"家庭医学科质量改进能力:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Lauren Oshman,&nbsp;Taylor Walton,&nbsp;Paul Schultz,&nbsp;Robin Barry,&nbsp;Linda Speer","doi":"10.22454/PRiMER.2023.889614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Quality improvement capacity is defined as ongoing commitment to sustained quality improvement (QI) and requires knowledge of QI methods and commitment to QI activities from practice leadership and staff. The aim of this project was to identify the major facilitators and barriers to developing quality improvement capacity in a teaching practice of a department of family medicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an exploratory, sequential, mixed-methods study, inviting key informants to participate in qualitative interviews and then conducting a survey of faculty, resident physicians, and staff at a community residency teaching practice affiliated with an academic medical center in the Midwest United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 12 qualitative key informant interviewees, facilitators of QI capacity included a strong motivation to provide high-quality care and a desire to leverage team-based care in QI interventions. Barriers included competing clinical and educational priorities, lack of faculty expertise in quality and scholarship, and lack of infrastructure to turn QI into scholarship. The survey response rate was 75% (48 of 64 total team members). The most common motivation for participation in QI work was \"making a difference\" (41, 85%), while the biggest barriers were prioritization of patient care (25, 53%), and teaching (19, 40%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This mixed-methods study identified key barriers and facilitators to QI capacity, of which addressing competing priorities, improving QI training, and creating infrastructure for scholarship may improve QI capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":74494,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","volume":"7 ","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10351432/pdf/primer-7-17.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality Improvement Capacity in a Department of Family Medicine: A Mixed-Methods Study.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Oshman,&nbsp;Taylor Walton,&nbsp;Paul Schultz,&nbsp;Robin Barry,&nbsp;Linda Speer\",\"doi\":\"10.22454/PRiMER.2023.889614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Quality improvement capacity is defined as ongoing commitment to sustained quality improvement (QI) and requires knowledge of QI methods and commitment to QI activities from practice leadership and staff. The aim of this project was to identify the major facilitators and barriers to developing quality improvement capacity in a teaching practice of a department of family medicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an exploratory, sequential, mixed-methods study, inviting key informants to participate in qualitative interviews and then conducting a survey of faculty, resident physicians, and staff at a community residency teaching practice affiliated with an academic medical center in the Midwest United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 12 qualitative key informant interviewees, facilitators of QI capacity included a strong motivation to provide high-quality care and a desire to leverage team-based care in QI interventions. Barriers included competing clinical and educational priorities, lack of faculty expertise in quality and scholarship, and lack of infrastructure to turn QI into scholarship. The survey response rate was 75% (48 of 64 total team members). The most common motivation for participation in QI work was \\\"making a difference\\\" (41, 85%), while the biggest barriers were prioritization of patient care (25, 53%), and teaching (19, 40%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This mixed-methods study identified key barriers and facilitators to QI capacity, of which addressing competing priorities, improving QI training, and creating infrastructure for scholarship may improve QI capacity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10351432/pdf/primer-7-17.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2023.889614\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2023.889614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目标:质量改进能力被定义为对持续质量改进(QI)的持续承诺,要求实践领导和员工对QI方法的知识和对QI活动的承诺。该项目的目的是确定在家庭医学系教学实践中发展质量改进能力的主要促进因素和障碍。方法:我们进行了一项探索性的、顺序的、混合方法的研究,邀请关键信息提供者参加定性访谈,然后对美国中西部一家学术医疗中心附属的社区住院医师教学实践的教师、住院医师和工作人员进行调查。结果:在12个定性关键信息受访者中,QI能力的促进因素包括提供高质量护理的强烈动机和在QI干预中利用团队护理的愿望。障碍包括临床和教育优先级的竞争,缺乏教师在质量和奖学金方面的专业知识,以及缺乏将QI转化为奖学金的基础设施。调查回复率为75%(64名团队成员中的48名)。参与QI工作最常见的动机是“有所作为”(41.85%),而最大的障碍是优先考虑患者护理(25.53%)和教学(19.40%)。结论:该混合方法研究确定了QI能力的关键障碍和促进因素,其中解决竞争优先事项、改善QI培训和创建奖学金基础设施可能会提高QI能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality Improvement Capacity in a Department of Family Medicine: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Background and objectives: Quality improvement capacity is defined as ongoing commitment to sustained quality improvement (QI) and requires knowledge of QI methods and commitment to QI activities from practice leadership and staff. The aim of this project was to identify the major facilitators and barriers to developing quality improvement capacity in a teaching practice of a department of family medicine.

Methods: We conducted an exploratory, sequential, mixed-methods study, inviting key informants to participate in qualitative interviews and then conducting a survey of faculty, resident physicians, and staff at a community residency teaching practice affiliated with an academic medical center in the Midwest United States.

Results: Among 12 qualitative key informant interviewees, facilitators of QI capacity included a strong motivation to provide high-quality care and a desire to leverage team-based care in QI interventions. Barriers included competing clinical and educational priorities, lack of faculty expertise in quality and scholarship, and lack of infrastructure to turn QI into scholarship. The survey response rate was 75% (48 of 64 total team members). The most common motivation for participation in QI work was "making a difference" (41, 85%), while the biggest barriers were prioritization of patient care (25, 53%), and teaching (19, 40%).

Conclusion: This mixed-methods study identified key barriers and facilitators to QI capacity, of which addressing competing priorities, improving QI training, and creating infrastructure for scholarship may improve QI capacity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信