正念计划忠实度的简要衡量标准:基于正念的干预工具的简明保真度开发与评估》(Concise Fidelity for Mindfulness-Based Interventions Tool)。

Global advances in integrative medicine and health Pub Date : 2023-07-01 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/27536130231174234
Carol M Greco, Graham A Dore, Janice M Weinberg, Isabel Roth, Holly N Thomas, Suzanne Lawrence, Ruth Rodriguez, Megan McGillis, Natalia E Morone
{"title":"正念计划忠实度的简要衡量标准:基于正念的干预工具的简明保真度开发与评估》(Concise Fidelity for Mindfulness-Based Interventions Tool)。","authors":"Carol M Greco, Graham A Dore, Janice M Weinberg, Isabel Roth, Holly N Thomas, Suzanne Lawrence, Ruth Rodriguez, Megan McGillis, Natalia E Morone","doi":"10.1177/27536130231174234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mindfulness research and clinical programs are widespread, and it is important that mindfulness-based interventions are delivered with fidelity, or as intended, across settings. The MBI:TAC is a comprehensive system for assessing teacher competence, yet it can be complex to implement. A standardized, simple fidelity/engagement tool to address treatment delivery is needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We describe the development, evaluation, and outcomes of a brief, practical tool for assessing fidelity and engagement in online mindfulness-based programs. The tool contains questions about session elements such as meditation guidance and group discussion, and questions about participant engagement and technology-based barriers to engagement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The fidelity rating tool was developed and tested in OPTIMUM, Optimizing Pain Treatment in Medical settings Using Mindfulness. The OPTIMUM study is a 3-site pragmatic randomized trial of group medical visits and adapted mindfulness-based stress reduction for primary care patients with chronic low back pain, delivered online. Two trained study personnel independently rated 26 recorded OPTIMUM sessions to determine inter-rater reliability of the Concise Fidelity for Mindfulness-Based Interventions (CoFi-MBI) tool. Trained raters also completed the CoFi-MBI for 105 sessions. Raters provided qualitative data via optional open text fields within the tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inter-rater agreement was 77-100% for presence of key session components, and 69-88% for Likert ratings of participant engagement and challenges related to technology, with discrepancies only occurring within 2 categories: 'very much' and 'quite a bit'. Key session components occurred as intended in 94-100% of the 105 sessions, and participant engagement was rated as 'very much' or 'quite a bit' in 95% of the sessions. Qualitative analysis of rater comments revealed themes related to engagement challenges and technology failures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CoFi-MBI provides a practical way to assess basic adherence to online delivery of mindfulness session elements, participant engagement, and extent of technology obstacles. Optional text can guide strategies to improve engagement and reduce technology barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":73159,"journal":{"name":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/14/ae/10.1177_27536130231174234.PMC10327996.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Brief Measure of Fidelity for Mindfulness Programs: Development and Evaluation of the Concise Fidelity for Mindfulness-Based Interventions Tool.\",\"authors\":\"Carol M Greco, Graham A Dore, Janice M Weinberg, Isabel Roth, Holly N Thomas, Suzanne Lawrence, Ruth Rodriguez, Megan McGillis, Natalia E Morone\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27536130231174234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mindfulness research and clinical programs are widespread, and it is important that mindfulness-based interventions are delivered with fidelity, or as intended, across settings. The MBI:TAC is a comprehensive system for assessing teacher competence, yet it can be complex to implement. A standardized, simple fidelity/engagement tool to address treatment delivery is needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We describe the development, evaluation, and outcomes of a brief, practical tool for assessing fidelity and engagement in online mindfulness-based programs. The tool contains questions about session elements such as meditation guidance and group discussion, and questions about participant engagement and technology-based barriers to engagement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The fidelity rating tool was developed and tested in OPTIMUM, Optimizing Pain Treatment in Medical settings Using Mindfulness. The OPTIMUM study is a 3-site pragmatic randomized trial of group medical visits and adapted mindfulness-based stress reduction for primary care patients with chronic low back pain, delivered online. Two trained study personnel independently rated 26 recorded OPTIMUM sessions to determine inter-rater reliability of the Concise Fidelity for Mindfulness-Based Interventions (CoFi-MBI) tool. Trained raters also completed the CoFi-MBI for 105 sessions. Raters provided qualitative data via optional open text fields within the tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inter-rater agreement was 77-100% for presence of key session components, and 69-88% for Likert ratings of participant engagement and challenges related to technology, with discrepancies only occurring within 2 categories: 'very much' and 'quite a bit'. Key session components occurred as intended in 94-100% of the 105 sessions, and participant engagement was rated as 'very much' or 'quite a bit' in 95% of the sessions. Qualitative analysis of rater comments revealed themes related to engagement challenges and technology failures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CoFi-MBI provides a practical way to assess basic adherence to online delivery of mindfulness session elements, participant engagement, and extent of technology obstacles. Optional text can guide strategies to improve engagement and reduce technology barriers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global advances in integrative medicine and health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/14/ae/10.1177_27536130231174234.PMC10327996.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global advances in integrative medicine and health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536130231174234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536130231174234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:正念研究和临床项目非常广泛,重要的是在各种环境中都能忠实地实施基于正念的干预措施。MBI:TAC是一个评估教师能力的综合系统,但实施起来却很复杂。我们需要一个标准化、简单的忠实度/参与度工具来解决治疗实施问题:我们介绍了一种简明实用的工具的开发、评估和结果,该工具用于评估在线正念课程的忠实度和参与度。该工具包含有关冥想指导和小组讨论等课程要素的问题,以及有关参与者参与度和基于技术的参与障碍的问题:忠实度评级工具是在 OPTIMUM(利用正念优化医疗环境中的疼痛治疗)中开发和测试的。OPTIMUM 研究是一项在 3 个地点进行的实用随机试验,针对慢性腰背痛的初级保健患者进行小组医疗访问和经调整的正念减压,并通过在线方式进行。两名经过培训的研究人员对 26 个录制的 OPTIMUM 会话进行了独立评分,以确定正念干预简明保真度(CoFi-MBI)工具的评分间可靠性。训练有素的评分员还完成了 105 个疗程的 CoFi-MBI 测评。评分者通过工具中的可选开放文本字段提供定性数据:在关键环节的存在性方面,评分者之间的一致率为 77%-100%,在参与者参与度和与技术相关的挑战方面,李克特评分的一致率为 69%-88%,差异仅出现在两个类别中:"非常多 "和 "相当多"。在 105 场培训中,94%-100% 的培训按计划进行,95% 的培训将参与者的参与度评为 "非常多 "或 "相当多"。对评分者意见的定性分析揭示了与参与挑战和技术故障相关的主题:CoFi-MBI提供了一种实用的方法来评估在线正念课程元素的基本坚持情况、参与者的参与度以及技术障碍的程度。可选文本可以为提高参与度和减少技术障碍的策略提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Brief Measure of Fidelity for Mindfulness Programs: Development and Evaluation of the Concise Fidelity for Mindfulness-Based Interventions Tool.

A Brief Measure of Fidelity for Mindfulness Programs: Development and Evaluation of the Concise Fidelity for Mindfulness-Based Interventions Tool.

A Brief Measure of Fidelity for Mindfulness Programs: Development and Evaluation of the Concise Fidelity for Mindfulness-Based Interventions Tool.

A Brief Measure of Fidelity for Mindfulness Programs: Development and Evaluation of the Concise Fidelity for Mindfulness-Based Interventions Tool.

Background: Mindfulness research and clinical programs are widespread, and it is important that mindfulness-based interventions are delivered with fidelity, or as intended, across settings. The MBI:TAC is a comprehensive system for assessing teacher competence, yet it can be complex to implement. A standardized, simple fidelity/engagement tool to address treatment delivery is needed.

Objective: We describe the development, evaluation, and outcomes of a brief, practical tool for assessing fidelity and engagement in online mindfulness-based programs. The tool contains questions about session elements such as meditation guidance and group discussion, and questions about participant engagement and technology-based barriers to engagement.

Methods: The fidelity rating tool was developed and tested in OPTIMUM, Optimizing Pain Treatment in Medical settings Using Mindfulness. The OPTIMUM study is a 3-site pragmatic randomized trial of group medical visits and adapted mindfulness-based stress reduction for primary care patients with chronic low back pain, delivered online. Two trained study personnel independently rated 26 recorded OPTIMUM sessions to determine inter-rater reliability of the Concise Fidelity for Mindfulness-Based Interventions (CoFi-MBI) tool. Trained raters also completed the CoFi-MBI for 105 sessions. Raters provided qualitative data via optional open text fields within the tool.

Results: Inter-rater agreement was 77-100% for presence of key session components, and 69-88% for Likert ratings of participant engagement and challenges related to technology, with discrepancies only occurring within 2 categories: 'very much' and 'quite a bit'. Key session components occurred as intended in 94-100% of the 105 sessions, and participant engagement was rated as 'very much' or 'quite a bit' in 95% of the sessions. Qualitative analysis of rater comments revealed themes related to engagement challenges and technology failures.

Conclusion: The CoFi-MBI provides a practical way to assess basic adherence to online delivery of mindfulness session elements, participant engagement, and extent of technology obstacles. Optional text can guide strategies to improve engagement and reduce technology barriers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信