Osama Z Alzobi, Ashraf T Hantouly, Mohamed Kenawey, Talal Ibrahim
{"title":"肘部以下与肘部以上石膏治疗儿童前臂远端移位骨折:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Osama Z Alzobi, Ashraf T Hantouly, Mohamed Kenawey, Talal Ibrahim","doi":"10.1177/18632521231162621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Distal forearm fractures are the most common pediatric fractures. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of below-elbow cast treatment for displaced distal forearm fractures in children compared to above-elbow cast through meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Several databases from January 1, 2000 until October 1, 2021 were searched for randomized controlled trials that assessed below versus above-elbow cast treatment of displaced distal forearm fractures in pediatric patients. The main meta-analysis comparison was based on the relative risk of loss of fracture reduction between children undergoing below versus above-elbow cast treatment. Other outcome measures including re-manipulation and cast-related complications were also investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies were eligible of the 156 articles identified, with a total of 1049 children. Analysis was undertaken for all included studies with a sensitivity analysis conducted for studies with high quality. In the sensitivity analysis, the relative risks of loss of fracture reduction (relative risk = 0.6, 95% confidence interval = 0.38, 0.96) and re-manipulation (relative risk = 0.3, 95% confidence interval = 0.19, 0.48) between the below and above-elbow cast groups were in favor of below-elbow cast and statistically significant. Cast-related complications were in favor of below-elbow cast but did not attain statistical significance (relative risk = 0.45, 95% confidence interval = 0.05, 3.99). Loss of fracture reduction was noted in 28.9% of patients treated with above-elbow cast and 21.5% in below-elbow cast. Re-manipulation was attempted in 48.1% versus 53.8% of children who lost fracture reduction in the below-elbow cast and above-elbow cast groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Below-elbow cast treatment was favored, with statistical significance, in terms of loss of fracture reduction and re-manipulation, and was not associated with a higher risk of cast-related complications. The accumulative evidence currently does not support above-elbow cast treatment and below-elbow cast treatment should be the mainstay for displaced distal forearm fractures in children.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level I, meta-analysis of therapeutic level I studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":56060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Childrens Orthopaedics","volume":"17 3","pages":"249-258"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10242373/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Below- versus above-elbow cast treatment of displaced distal forearm fractures in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Osama Z Alzobi, Ashraf T Hantouly, Mohamed Kenawey, Talal Ibrahim\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/18632521231162621\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Distal forearm fractures are the most common pediatric fractures. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of below-elbow cast treatment for displaced distal forearm fractures in children compared to above-elbow cast through meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Several databases from January 1, 2000 until October 1, 2021 were searched for randomized controlled trials that assessed below versus above-elbow cast treatment of displaced distal forearm fractures in pediatric patients. The main meta-analysis comparison was based on the relative risk of loss of fracture reduction between children undergoing below versus above-elbow cast treatment. Other outcome measures including re-manipulation and cast-related complications were also investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies were eligible of the 156 articles identified, with a total of 1049 children. Analysis was undertaken for all included studies with a sensitivity analysis conducted for studies with high quality. In the sensitivity analysis, the relative risks of loss of fracture reduction (relative risk = 0.6, 95% confidence interval = 0.38, 0.96) and re-manipulation (relative risk = 0.3, 95% confidence interval = 0.19, 0.48) between the below and above-elbow cast groups were in favor of below-elbow cast and statistically significant. Cast-related complications were in favor of below-elbow cast but did not attain statistical significance (relative risk = 0.45, 95% confidence interval = 0.05, 3.99). Loss of fracture reduction was noted in 28.9% of patients treated with above-elbow cast and 21.5% in below-elbow cast. Re-manipulation was attempted in 48.1% versus 53.8% of children who lost fracture reduction in the below-elbow cast and above-elbow cast groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Below-elbow cast treatment was favored, with statistical significance, in terms of loss of fracture reduction and re-manipulation, and was not associated with a higher risk of cast-related complications. The accumulative evidence currently does not support above-elbow cast treatment and below-elbow cast treatment should be the mainstay for displaced distal forearm fractures in children.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level I, meta-analysis of therapeutic level I studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Childrens Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"249-258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10242373/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Childrens Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/18632521231162621\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Childrens Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18632521231162621","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Below- versus above-elbow cast treatment of displaced distal forearm fractures in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Objectives: Distal forearm fractures are the most common pediatric fractures. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of below-elbow cast treatment for displaced distal forearm fractures in children compared to above-elbow cast through meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Methods: Several databases from January 1, 2000 until October 1, 2021 were searched for randomized controlled trials that assessed below versus above-elbow cast treatment of displaced distal forearm fractures in pediatric patients. The main meta-analysis comparison was based on the relative risk of loss of fracture reduction between children undergoing below versus above-elbow cast treatment. Other outcome measures including re-manipulation and cast-related complications were also investigated.
Results: Nine studies were eligible of the 156 articles identified, with a total of 1049 children. Analysis was undertaken for all included studies with a sensitivity analysis conducted for studies with high quality. In the sensitivity analysis, the relative risks of loss of fracture reduction (relative risk = 0.6, 95% confidence interval = 0.38, 0.96) and re-manipulation (relative risk = 0.3, 95% confidence interval = 0.19, 0.48) between the below and above-elbow cast groups were in favor of below-elbow cast and statistically significant. Cast-related complications were in favor of below-elbow cast but did not attain statistical significance (relative risk = 0.45, 95% confidence interval = 0.05, 3.99). Loss of fracture reduction was noted in 28.9% of patients treated with above-elbow cast and 21.5% in below-elbow cast. Re-manipulation was attempted in 48.1% versus 53.8% of children who lost fracture reduction in the below-elbow cast and above-elbow cast groups, respectively.
Conclusion: Below-elbow cast treatment was favored, with statistical significance, in terms of loss of fracture reduction and re-manipulation, and was not associated with a higher risk of cast-related complications. The accumulative evidence currently does not support above-elbow cast treatment and below-elbow cast treatment should be the mainstay for displaced distal forearm fractures in children.
Level of evidence: Level I, meta-analysis of therapeutic level I studies.
期刊介绍：
Aims & Scope
The Journal of Children’s Orthopaedics is the official journal of the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS) and is published by The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
It provides a forum for the advancement of the knowledge and education in paediatric orthopaedics and traumatology across geographical borders. It advocates an increased worldwide involvement in preventing and treating musculoskeletal diseases in children and adolescents.
The journal publishes high quality, peer-reviewed articles that focus on clinical practice, diagnosis and treatment of disorders unique to paediatric orthopaedics, as well as on basic and applied research. It aims to help physicians stay abreast of the latest and ever-changing developments in the field of paediatric orthopaedics and traumatology.
The journal welcomes original contributions submitted exclusively for review to the journal. This continuously published online journal is fully open access and will publish one print issue each year to coincide with the EPOS Annual Congress, featuring the meeting’s abstracts.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
