Valentina González-Jaramillo, Alicia Krikorian, Vilma Tripodoro, Margarita Jorge, Sofia C Zambrano, Francy López, Maria Clara Vélez, Tatiana Noguera, Sebastián Orellana, Silvina Montilla, Andri Christen-Cevallos Rosero, Steffen Eychmüller
{"title":"富有同情心的社区:如何评估他们的利益?不同国家之间合作研究的协议。","authors":"Valentina González-Jaramillo, Alicia Krikorian, Vilma Tripodoro, Margarita Jorge, Sofia C Zambrano, Francy López, Maria Clara Vélez, Tatiana Noguera, Sebastián Orellana, Silvina Montilla, Andri Christen-Cevallos Rosero, Steffen Eychmüller","doi":"10.1177/26323524231170885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Communities and local governments invest in compassionate communities (CCs) a great deal of time, money, effort, and work. However, it is not known whether the CCs are having the effect they are expected to have, so the value of continuing with these initiatives is unknown, and there is a need for a model for evaluating CCs to solve the question.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify a set of core outcomes or benefits that should be measured to assess the impact of the CCs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multiple-methods study involving three communities, each in a different country (Argentina, Colombia, and Switzerland).</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>To identifying the set of core outcomes, which is the first step in developing the CC evaluation model, five phases will follow: online meetings, literature review, fieldwork, Delphi survey, and social transfer. We will involve members of the local communities of Bern, Buenos Aires, and Medellin at three different levels: (1) citizens (e.g. patients, caregivers, and family members), (2) organizations and institutions involved in the program implementation (e.g. health care organizations, churches, non-governmental organizations, and schools), and (3) political and governmental sectors.</p><p><strong>Ethics: </strong>The study will be conducted following existing international regulations and guidance such as the Declaration of Helsinki. The ethics committee of Pallium Latin America and the ethics committee of the canton of Bern considered our application exempt from the need for approval. Ethics approval in Bern and Buenos Aires is in the process of being obtained. The ethics committee of the Pontifical Bolivarian University approved this protocol.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We expect that this project will help bridge the gap in knowledge regarding the measurable impact of the CCs and enhance more CC development.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/df/13/10.1177_26323524231170885.PMC10176585.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compassionate communities: How to assess their benefit? A protocol of a collaborative study between different countries.\",\"authors\":\"Valentina González-Jaramillo, Alicia Krikorian, Vilma Tripodoro, Margarita Jorge, Sofia C Zambrano, Francy López, Maria Clara Vélez, Tatiana Noguera, Sebastián Orellana, Silvina Montilla, Andri Christen-Cevallos Rosero, Steffen Eychmüller\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26323524231170885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Communities and local governments invest in compassionate communities (CCs) a great deal of time, money, effort, and work. However, it is not known whether the CCs are having the effect they are expected to have, so the value of continuing with these initiatives is unknown, and there is a need for a model for evaluating CCs to solve the question.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify a set of core outcomes or benefits that should be measured to assess the impact of the CCs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multiple-methods study involving three communities, each in a different country (Argentina, Colombia, and Switzerland).</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>To identifying the set of core outcomes, which is the first step in developing the CC evaluation model, five phases will follow: online meetings, literature review, fieldwork, Delphi survey, and social transfer. We will involve members of the local communities of Bern, Buenos Aires, and Medellin at three different levels: (1) citizens (e.g. patients, caregivers, and family members), (2) organizations and institutions involved in the program implementation (e.g. health care organizations, churches, non-governmental organizations, and schools), and (3) political and governmental sectors.</p><p><strong>Ethics: </strong>The study will be conducted following existing international regulations and guidance such as the Declaration of Helsinki. The ethics committee of Pallium Latin America and the ethics committee of the canton of Bern considered our application exempt from the need for approval. Ethics approval in Bern and Buenos Aires is in the process of being obtained. The ethics committee of the Pontifical Bolivarian University approved this protocol.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We expect that this project will help bridge the gap in knowledge regarding the measurable impact of the CCs and enhance more CC development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative Care and Social Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/df/13/10.1177_26323524231170885.PMC10176585.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative Care and Social Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524231170885\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524231170885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:社区和地方政府投入了大量的时间、金钱、精力和工作。然而,目前尚不清楚CCs是否达到了预期的效果,因此,继续实施这些举措的价值是未知的,需要一个评估CCs的模型来解决这个问题。目标:确定一组核心成果或利益,以评估共同承诺的影响。设计:多方法研究涉及三个不同国家的社区(阿根廷、哥伦比亚和瑞士)。方法与分析:为了确定核心结果集,这是开发CC评估模型的第一步,将遵循五个阶段:在线会议、文献综述、实地调查、德尔菲调查和社会转移。我们将让伯尔尼、布宜诺斯艾利斯和麦德林当地社区的成员在三个不同的层面上参与进来:(1)公民(如患者、护理人员和家庭成员),(2)参与项目实施的组织和机构(如卫生保健组织、教会、非政府组织和学校),以及(3)政治和政府部门。伦理:本研究将遵循现有的国际法规和指导,如《赫尔辛基宣言》。Pallium Latin America的伦理委员会和Bern州的伦理委员会认为我们的申请不需要批准。伯尔尼和布宜诺斯艾利斯的伦理审批正在进行中。宗座玻利瓦尔大学伦理委员会批准了这项协议。讨论:我们期望这个项目将有助于弥合关于可衡量的共同承诺影响的知识差距,并促进更多的共同承诺发展。
Compassionate communities: How to assess their benefit? A protocol of a collaborative study between different countries.
Background: Communities and local governments invest in compassionate communities (CCs) a great deal of time, money, effort, and work. However, it is not known whether the CCs are having the effect they are expected to have, so the value of continuing with these initiatives is unknown, and there is a need for a model for evaluating CCs to solve the question.
Objectives: To identify a set of core outcomes or benefits that should be measured to assess the impact of the CCs.
Design: Multiple-methods study involving three communities, each in a different country (Argentina, Colombia, and Switzerland).
Methods and analysis: To identifying the set of core outcomes, which is the first step in developing the CC evaluation model, five phases will follow: online meetings, literature review, fieldwork, Delphi survey, and social transfer. We will involve members of the local communities of Bern, Buenos Aires, and Medellin at three different levels: (1) citizens (e.g. patients, caregivers, and family members), (2) organizations and institutions involved in the program implementation (e.g. health care organizations, churches, non-governmental organizations, and schools), and (3) political and governmental sectors.
Ethics: The study will be conducted following existing international regulations and guidance such as the Declaration of Helsinki. The ethics committee of Pallium Latin America and the ethics committee of the canton of Bern considered our application exempt from the need for approval. Ethics approval in Bern and Buenos Aires is in the process of being obtained. The ethics committee of the Pontifical Bolivarian University approved this protocol.
Discussion: We expect that this project will help bridge the gap in knowledge regarding the measurable impact of the CCs and enhance more CC development.