Kenneth Blum, Catherine Dennen, Paul R Carney, Elizabeth Gilley, Panayotis K Thanos, Eric R Braverman, David Baron, Colin Hanna, Edward J Modestino, Mark S Gold, Igor Elman, Rajendra D Badgaiyan
{"title":"儿童精神兴奋剂:我们用药过量还是不足?","authors":"Kenneth Blum, Catherine Dennen, Paul R Carney, Elizabeth Gilley, Panayotis K Thanos, Eric R Braverman, David Baron, Colin Hanna, Edward J Modestino, Mark S Gold, Igor Elman, Rajendra D Badgaiyan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An estimated 3% to 10% of school children meet the DSM-V criteria for ADHD (Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder), however, to be over-diagnosed, the rate of children inappropriately diagnosed with ADHD (false positives) would have to be larger than the number of children with ADHD who are under-identified and not diagnosed (false negatives). Accordingly, a number of investigators take the position that under-treatment with psychostimulants, especially in children and adolescence, will result in continued ADHD symptomatology including future Substance Use Disorder (SUD). However, other researchers and clinicians believe otherwise and espouse laudable arguments for caution and prolonged methamphetamine treatment. While there is ongoing controversy of the role of genetics and epigenetics linked to ADHD, it seems clear that a number of dopaminergic genes and their risk polymorphisms act as DNA antecedents impacted by epigenetic induced methylation. Our hypothesis and literature review suggest that one possible solution is to embrace non addictive interventions to induce global dopamine homeostasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":73582,"journal":{"name":"Journal of addiction psychiatry","volume":"7 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411151/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychostimulants for Children: Are We Over or Under Dosing?\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth Blum, Catherine Dennen, Paul R Carney, Elizabeth Gilley, Panayotis K Thanos, Eric R Braverman, David Baron, Colin Hanna, Edward J Modestino, Mark S Gold, Igor Elman, Rajendra D Badgaiyan\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An estimated 3% to 10% of school children meet the DSM-V criteria for ADHD (Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder), however, to be over-diagnosed, the rate of children inappropriately diagnosed with ADHD (false positives) would have to be larger than the number of children with ADHD who are under-identified and not diagnosed (false negatives). Accordingly, a number of investigators take the position that under-treatment with psychostimulants, especially in children and adolescence, will result in continued ADHD symptomatology including future Substance Use Disorder (SUD). However, other researchers and clinicians believe otherwise and espouse laudable arguments for caution and prolonged methamphetamine treatment. While there is ongoing controversy of the role of genetics and epigenetics linked to ADHD, it seems clear that a number of dopaminergic genes and their risk polymorphisms act as DNA antecedents impacted by epigenetic induced methylation. Our hypothesis and literature review suggest that one possible solution is to embrace non addictive interventions to induce global dopamine homeostasis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of addiction psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411151/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of addiction psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of addiction psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
据估计,3%-10% 的学龄儿童符合 DSM-V 多动症(注意力缺陷/多动障碍)的标准,但是,如果要达到过度诊断的程度,那么被不恰当地诊断为多动症(假阳性)的儿童人数必须多于未被充分识别和诊断为多动症(假阴性)的儿童人数。因此,一些研究人员认为,精神刺激剂治疗不足,尤其是在儿童和青少年时期,将导致持续的多动症症状,包括未来的药物使用障碍(SUD)。然而,其他研究人员和临床医生却不这么认为,他们支持谨慎和延长甲基苯丙胺治疗时间的观点,这一点值得称赞。虽然遗传学和表观遗传学在多动症中的作用一直存在争议,但似乎很清楚的是,一些多巴胺能基因及其风险多态性是受表观遗传学诱导甲基化影响的 DNA 前体。我们的假设和文献综述表明,一种可能的解决方案是采用非成瘾性干预措施来诱导全球多巴胺平衡。
Psychostimulants for Children: Are We Over or Under Dosing?
An estimated 3% to 10% of school children meet the DSM-V criteria for ADHD (Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder), however, to be over-diagnosed, the rate of children inappropriately diagnosed with ADHD (false positives) would have to be larger than the number of children with ADHD who are under-identified and not diagnosed (false negatives). Accordingly, a number of investigators take the position that under-treatment with psychostimulants, especially in children and adolescence, will result in continued ADHD symptomatology including future Substance Use Disorder (SUD). However, other researchers and clinicians believe otherwise and espouse laudable arguments for caution and prolonged methamphetamine treatment. While there is ongoing controversy of the role of genetics and epigenetics linked to ADHD, it seems clear that a number of dopaminergic genes and their risk polymorphisms act as DNA antecedents impacted by epigenetic induced methylation. Our hypothesis and literature review suggest that one possible solution is to embrace non addictive interventions to induce global dopamine homeostasis.