Maurício Bottene Guarda, Rafael Rocha Pacheco, Isaias Donizeti Silva, William Cunha Brandt, Mario Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti, Rafael Pino Vitti
{"title":"不同粘接体系及电流方向对树脂复合材料与牙本质微拉伸结合强度的影响。","authors":"Maurício Bottene Guarda, Rafael Rocha Pacheco, Isaias Donizeti Silva, William Cunha Brandt, Mario Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti, Rafael Pino Vitti","doi":"10.1590/0103-6440202204870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thisstudy aimed to evaluate the effect of the electric current direction application on the resin composite-dentin bond strength using three adhesive systems. Human molar teeth were distributed according to the adhesive system (two-step self-etch - Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray [CSE]; one-step self-etch - Single Bond Universal, 3M ESPE [SBU]; and two-step etch-and-rinse - Adper Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE [SB2]), electric current direction (without electric current - control, direct and reverse electric currents - 35µA), and storage time (24h - immediate and 6 months). Resin composite blocks (Filtek Z350XT, 3M ESPE) were bonded to dentin. The teeth/resin composites specimens were stored in distilled water at 37ºC for 24 hours and 6 months for the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) test (n = 10; ~12 sticks for each tooth). Failure patterns were analyzed on a stereomicroscope and classified as cohesive-dentin, cohesive-resin, adhesive or mixed. Adhesive penetration into dentin and hybrid layer formation were evaluated in a scanning electron microscope (n = 6). Data were submitted to a three-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05). There are no differences in µTBS when the adhesive systems were applied under direct and reverse electric currents, but both electric currents increased the µTBS for all adhesive systems. SBU showed the lowest µTBS values for control groups in both storage times and direct electric current in 6 months of storage. The adhesive failure pattern was more frequently observed in all groups. The electric current formed long resin tags for all adhesive systems. Storage for 6 months did not significantly decrease µTBS values. Both directions of electric current (positive and negative charges) at 35µA can increase the µTBS of the adhesive systems tested to dentin.</p>","PeriodicalId":9211,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":"33 6","pages":"86-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733368/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microtensile bond strength of resin composite to dentin using different adhesive systems and directions of electric current.\",\"authors\":\"Maurício Bottene Guarda, Rafael Rocha Pacheco, Isaias Donizeti Silva, William Cunha Brandt, Mario Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti, Rafael Pino Vitti\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0103-6440202204870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Thisstudy aimed to evaluate the effect of the electric current direction application on the resin composite-dentin bond strength using three adhesive systems. Human molar teeth were distributed according to the adhesive system (two-step self-etch - Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray [CSE]; one-step self-etch - Single Bond Universal, 3M ESPE [SBU]; and two-step etch-and-rinse - Adper Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE [SB2]), electric current direction (without electric current - control, direct and reverse electric currents - 35µA), and storage time (24h - immediate and 6 months). Resin composite blocks (Filtek Z350XT, 3M ESPE) were bonded to dentin. The teeth/resin composites specimens were stored in distilled water at 37ºC for 24 hours and 6 months for the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) test (n = 10; ~12 sticks for each tooth). Failure patterns were analyzed on a stereomicroscope and classified as cohesive-dentin, cohesive-resin, adhesive or mixed. Adhesive penetration into dentin and hybrid layer formation were evaluated in a scanning electron microscope (n = 6). Data were submitted to a three-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05). There are no differences in µTBS when the adhesive systems were applied under direct and reverse electric currents, but both electric currents increased the µTBS for all adhesive systems. SBU showed the lowest µTBS values for control groups in both storage times and direct electric current in 6 months of storage. The adhesive failure pattern was more frequently observed in all groups. The electric current formed long resin tags for all adhesive systems. Storage for 6 months did not significantly decrease µTBS values. Both directions of electric current (positive and negative charges) at 35µA can increase the µTBS of the adhesive systems tested to dentin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian dental journal\",\"volume\":\"33 6\",\"pages\":\"86-93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733368/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian dental journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202204870\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202204870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
采用三种不同的粘结体系,研究了电流方向对树脂复合牙本质粘结强度的影响。根据粘胶系统(两步自蚀刻- Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray [CSE];一步自腐蚀-单键通用,3M ESPE [SBU];和两步蚀刻和冲洗- Adper Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE [SB2]),电流方向(无电流控制,正向和反向电流- 35µA),存储时间(24小时-即时和6个月)。树脂复合块(Filtek Z350XT, 3M ESPE)与牙本质粘合。将牙/树脂复合材料样品在37℃蒸馏水中保存24小时和6个月,进行微拉伸粘结强度(µTBS)测试(n = 10;每颗牙齿约12根)。在体视显微镜下对破坏模式进行了分析,并将其分类为粘结性牙本质、粘结性树脂、粘结性或混合性。在扫描电镜下评估粘接剂对牙本质的渗透和杂化层的形成(n = 6)。数据进行三因素方差分析,然后进行Tukey事后检验(α = 0.05)。在直流和反向电流作用下,胶粘剂系统的µTBS没有差异,但两种电流都增加了所有胶粘剂系统的µTBS。SBU在6个月的储存时间和直流电流下,对照组的µTBS值都最低。粘接剂失效模式在所有组中都更为常见。电流形成了所有粘合剂系统的长树脂标签。6个月的储存没有显著降低µTBS值。35µA电流的两个方向(正电荷和负电荷)都可以增加黏附系统对牙本质的µTBS。
Microtensile bond strength of resin composite to dentin using different adhesive systems and directions of electric current.
Thisstudy aimed to evaluate the effect of the electric current direction application on the resin composite-dentin bond strength using three adhesive systems. Human molar teeth were distributed according to the adhesive system (two-step self-etch - Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray [CSE]; one-step self-etch - Single Bond Universal, 3M ESPE [SBU]; and two-step etch-and-rinse - Adper Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE [SB2]), electric current direction (without electric current - control, direct and reverse electric currents - 35µA), and storage time (24h - immediate and 6 months). Resin composite blocks (Filtek Z350XT, 3M ESPE) were bonded to dentin. The teeth/resin composites specimens were stored in distilled water at 37ºC for 24 hours and 6 months for the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) test (n = 10; ~12 sticks for each tooth). Failure patterns were analyzed on a stereomicroscope and classified as cohesive-dentin, cohesive-resin, adhesive or mixed. Adhesive penetration into dentin and hybrid layer formation were evaluated in a scanning electron microscope (n = 6). Data were submitted to a three-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05). There are no differences in µTBS when the adhesive systems were applied under direct and reverse electric currents, but both electric currents increased the µTBS for all adhesive systems. SBU showed the lowest µTBS values for control groups in both storage times and direct electric current in 6 months of storage. The adhesive failure pattern was more frequently observed in all groups. The electric current formed long resin tags for all adhesive systems. Storage for 6 months did not significantly decrease µTBS values. Both directions of electric current (positive and negative charges) at 35µA can increase the µTBS of the adhesive systems tested to dentin.
期刊介绍:
Brazilian Dental Journal, publishes Full-Length Papers, Short Communications and Case Reports, dealing with dentistry or related disciplines and edited six times a year.