基于神经科学的命名法作为一种教学工具,介绍和试点研究。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Sasson Zemach, Daniel Minkin Levy, Joseph Zohar
{"title":"基于神经科学的命名法作为一种教学工具,介绍和试点研究。","authors":"Sasson Zemach, Daniel Minkin Levy, Joseph Zohar","doi":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuroscience-based nomenclature (NbN) is a pharmacologically-driven nomenclature aiming to replace the current disease-based nomenclature of psychotropics, focusing on pharmacology and mode-of-action to encourage scientifically-minded prescribing. NbN might also be used as a teaching tool as it presents the depth and richness of the neuroscience of psychotropics. This study examines the effect of using NbN in student curriculum. Fifty-six medical students during clerkship in psychiatry, divided into a control group ( n  = 20), taught standard psychopharmacology, and an intervention group ( n  = 36) introduced with NbN. Both groups filled out identical questionnaires at the beginning and end of the clerkship, including questions of knowledge on psychopharmacology, views on current terminology and interest in psychiatric residency. Comparing the average change in scorings (delta post-pre) for each item in intervention vs. control questionnaires, the intervention group showed a significantly larger positive delta in 6 out of 10 items than the control group. Mean scores did not differ significantly between the two groups in the pre-questionnaires, while significantly higher scores were shown for the intervention group in within- and between-group comparisons. Introduction of NbN was associated with a better educational experience, a deeper understanding of psychotropics and increased interest in psychiatric residency.</p>","PeriodicalId":13698,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":"38 5","pages":"329-335"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11191058/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuroscience-based nomenclature as a teaching tool, introduction and pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Sasson Zemach, Daniel Minkin Levy, Joseph Zohar\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Neuroscience-based nomenclature (NbN) is a pharmacologically-driven nomenclature aiming to replace the current disease-based nomenclature of psychotropics, focusing on pharmacology and mode-of-action to encourage scientifically-minded prescribing. NbN might also be used as a teaching tool as it presents the depth and richness of the neuroscience of psychotropics. This study examines the effect of using NbN in student curriculum. Fifty-six medical students during clerkship in psychiatry, divided into a control group ( n  = 20), taught standard psychopharmacology, and an intervention group ( n  = 36) introduced with NbN. Both groups filled out identical questionnaires at the beginning and end of the clerkship, including questions of knowledge on psychopharmacology, views on current terminology and interest in psychiatric residency. Comparing the average change in scorings (delta post-pre) for each item in intervention vs. control questionnaires, the intervention group showed a significantly larger positive delta in 6 out of 10 items than the control group. Mean scores did not differ significantly between the two groups in the pre-questionnaires, while significantly higher scores were shown for the intervention group in within- and between-group comparisons. Introduction of NbN was associated with a better educational experience, a deeper understanding of psychotropics and increased interest in psychiatric residency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Clinical Psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\"38 5\",\"pages\":\"329-335\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11191058/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Clinical Psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/YIC.0000000000000470\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YIC.0000000000000470","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于神经科学的命名法(NbN)是一种以药理学为导向的命名法,旨在取代目前以疾病为导向的精神药物命名法,重点关注药理学和作用方式,鼓励以科学的态度开具处方。NbN 还可用作教学工具,因为它展现了精神药物神经科学的深度和丰富性。本研究探讨了在学生课程中使用 NbN 的效果。56 名在精神科实习的医科学生被分为对照组(20 人)和干预组(36 人),对照组教授标准精神药理学,干预组介绍 NbN。两组学生在实习开始和结束时都填写了相同的问卷,其中包括精神药理学知识、对当前术语的看法以及对精神病学实习的兴趣等问题。比较干预组与对照组调查问卷中每个项目的平均得分变化(前后△),发现干预组在 10 个项目中有 6 个项目的正△明显大于对照组。干预组和对照组在预调查问卷中的平均得分没有明显差异,而在组内和组间比较中,干预组的得分明显高于对照组。引入 NbN 与更好的教育体验、加深对精神药物的理解以及提高对精神病学住院医生的兴趣有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neuroscience-based nomenclature as a teaching tool, introduction and pilot study.

Neuroscience-based nomenclature (NbN) is a pharmacologically-driven nomenclature aiming to replace the current disease-based nomenclature of psychotropics, focusing on pharmacology and mode-of-action to encourage scientifically-minded prescribing. NbN might also be used as a teaching tool as it presents the depth and richness of the neuroscience of psychotropics. This study examines the effect of using NbN in student curriculum. Fifty-six medical students during clerkship in psychiatry, divided into a control group ( n  = 20), taught standard psychopharmacology, and an intervention group ( n  = 36) introduced with NbN. Both groups filled out identical questionnaires at the beginning and end of the clerkship, including questions of knowledge on psychopharmacology, views on current terminology and interest in psychiatric residency. Comparing the average change in scorings (delta post-pre) for each item in intervention vs. control questionnaires, the intervention group showed a significantly larger positive delta in 6 out of 10 items than the control group. Mean scores did not differ significantly between the two groups in the pre-questionnaires, while significantly higher scores were shown for the intervention group in within- and between-group comparisons. Introduction of NbN was associated with a better educational experience, a deeper understanding of psychotropics and increased interest in psychiatric residency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
23.10%
发文量
97
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Clinical Psychopharmacology provides an essential link between research and clinical practice throughout psychopharmacology. It reports on studies in human subjects, both healthy volunteers and patients, which relate the effects of drugs on psychological processes. A major objective of the journal is to publish fully refereed papers which throw light on the ways in which the study of psychotropic drugs can increase our understanding of psychopharmacology. To this end the journal publishes results of early Phase I and II studies, as well as those of controlled clinical trials of psychotropic drugs in Phase II and IV. Other topics covered include the epidemiology of psychotropic drug prescribing and drug taking, the sociology of psychotropic drugs including compliance, and research into the safety and adverse effects of these compounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信