Serdar Celik, Ozde Gokbayrak, Aylin Erol, Kutsal Yorukoglu, Tekincan Aktas, Hilmi Sari, Batuhan Yilmaz, Mehmet Ugur Mungan, Guven Aslan, Ilhan Celebi, Zekiye Altun, Tugba Yavuzsen, Safiye Aktas
{"title":"根据肿瘤图个性化治疗膀胱癌的安娜·卡列尼娜原则:哪种药物适合哪种患者?","authors":"Serdar Celik, Ozde Gokbayrak, Aylin Erol, Kutsal Yorukoglu, Tekincan Aktas, Hilmi Sari, Batuhan Yilmaz, Mehmet Ugur Mungan, Guven Aslan, Ilhan Celebi, Zekiye Altun, Tugba Yavuzsen, Safiye Aktas","doi":"10.2217/pme-2022-0134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To evaluate the <i>ex vivo</i> efficacy of chemotherapy, immunotherapy and targeted agents with the oncogram method in patients with bladder cancer and determine the most appropriate personalized treatment agent using immune markers. <b>Materials & methods:</b> Bladder cancer tissues were obtained from each patient. After cultivation, cell cultures were divided into 12 groups for each patient and 11 drugs were administered. Cell viability and immunohistochemistry expression were examined. <b>Results:</b> A good response rate was determined to be a 23% viability drop. The nivolumab good response rate was slightly better in PD-L1-positive patients and the ipilimumab good response rate was slightly better in tumoral CTLA-4-positive cases. Interestingly, the cetuximab response was worse in EGFR-positive cases. <b>Conclusion:</b> Although good responses of drug groups after their <i>ex vivo</i> application by using oncogram were found to be higher than control group, this outcome differed on a per patient basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19753,"journal":{"name":"Personalized medicine","volume":"20 2","pages":"175-182"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anna Karenina principle in personalized treatment of bladder cancer according to oncogram: which drug for which patient?\",\"authors\":\"Serdar Celik, Ozde Gokbayrak, Aylin Erol, Kutsal Yorukoglu, Tekincan Aktas, Hilmi Sari, Batuhan Yilmaz, Mehmet Ugur Mungan, Guven Aslan, Ilhan Celebi, Zekiye Altun, Tugba Yavuzsen, Safiye Aktas\",\"doi\":\"10.2217/pme-2022-0134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To evaluate the <i>ex vivo</i> efficacy of chemotherapy, immunotherapy and targeted agents with the oncogram method in patients with bladder cancer and determine the most appropriate personalized treatment agent using immune markers. <b>Materials & methods:</b> Bladder cancer tissues were obtained from each patient. After cultivation, cell cultures were divided into 12 groups for each patient and 11 drugs were administered. Cell viability and immunohistochemistry expression were examined. <b>Results:</b> A good response rate was determined to be a 23% viability drop. The nivolumab good response rate was slightly better in PD-L1-positive patients and the ipilimumab good response rate was slightly better in tumoral CTLA-4-positive cases. Interestingly, the cetuximab response was worse in EGFR-positive cases. <b>Conclusion:</b> Although good responses of drug groups after their <i>ex vivo</i> application by using oncogram were found to be higher than control group, this outcome differed on a per patient basis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personalized medicine\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"175-182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personalized medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2217/pme-2022-0134\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personalized medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/pme-2022-0134","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Anna Karenina principle in personalized treatment of bladder cancer according to oncogram: which drug for which patient?
Aim: To evaluate the ex vivo efficacy of chemotherapy, immunotherapy and targeted agents with the oncogram method in patients with bladder cancer and determine the most appropriate personalized treatment agent using immune markers. Materials & methods: Bladder cancer tissues were obtained from each patient. After cultivation, cell cultures were divided into 12 groups for each patient and 11 drugs were administered. Cell viability and immunohistochemistry expression were examined. Results: A good response rate was determined to be a 23% viability drop. The nivolumab good response rate was slightly better in PD-L1-positive patients and the ipilimumab good response rate was slightly better in tumoral CTLA-4-positive cases. Interestingly, the cetuximab response was worse in EGFR-positive cases. Conclusion: Although good responses of drug groups after their ex vivo application by using oncogram were found to be higher than control group, this outcome differed on a per patient basis.
期刊介绍:
Personalized Medicine (ISSN 1741-0541) translates recent genomic, genetic and proteomic advances into the clinical context. The journal provides an integrated forum for all players involved - academic and clinical researchers, pharmaceutical companies, regulatory authorities, healthcare management organizations, patient organizations and others in the healthcare community. Personalized Medicine assists these parties to shape thefuture of medicine by providing a platform for expert commentary and analysis.
The journal addresses scientific, commercial and policy issues in the field of precision medicine and includes news and views, current awareness regarding new biomarkers, concise commentary and analysis, reports from the conference circuit and full review articles.