影响染色质结合的内在无序序列对多同质凝聚物的调控。

IF 2.5 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Ibani Kapur, Elodie L Boulier, Nicole J Francis
{"title":"影响染色质结合的内在无序序列对多同质凝聚物的调控。","authors":"Ibani Kapur,&nbsp;Elodie L Boulier,&nbsp;Nicole J Francis","doi":"10.3390/epigenomes6040040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Polycomb group (PcG) complex PRC1 localizes in the nucleus in condensed structures called Polycomb bodies. The PRC1 subunit Polyhomeotic (Ph) contains an oligomerizing sterile alpha motif (SAM) that is implicated in both PcG body formation and chromatin organization in <i>Drosophila</i> and mammalian cells. A truncated version of Ph containing the SAM (mini-Ph) forms phase-separated condensates with DNA or chromatin in vitro, suggesting that PcG bodies may form through SAM-driven phase separation. In cells, Ph forms multiple small condensates, while mini-Ph typically forms a single large nuclear condensate. We therefore hypothesized that sequences outside of mini-Ph, which are predicted to be intrinsically disordered, are required for proper condensate formation. We identified three distinct low-complexity regions in Ph based on sequence composition. We systematically tested the role of each of these sequences in Ph condensates using live imaging of transfected <i>Drosophila</i> S2 cells. Each sequence uniquely affected Ph SAM-dependent condensate size, number, and morphology, but the most dramatic effects occurred when the central, glutamine-rich intrinsically disordered region (IDR) was removed, which resulted in large Ph condensates. Like mini-Ph condensates, condensates lacking the glutamine-rich IDR excluded chromatin. Chromatin fractionation experiments indicated that the removal of the glutamine-rich IDR reduced chromatin binding and that the removal of either of the other IDRs increased chromatin binding. Our data suggest that all three IDRs, and functional interactions among them, regulate Ph condensate size and number. Our results can be explained by a model in which tight chromatin binding by Ph IDRs antagonizes Ph SAM-driven phase separation. Our observations highlight the complexity of regulation of biological condensates housed in single proteins.</p>","PeriodicalId":55768,"journal":{"name":"Epigenomes","volume":"6 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680516/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulation of Polyhomeotic Condensates by Intrinsically Disordered Sequences That Affect Chromatin Binding.\",\"authors\":\"Ibani Kapur,&nbsp;Elodie L Boulier,&nbsp;Nicole J Francis\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/epigenomes6040040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Polycomb group (PcG) complex PRC1 localizes in the nucleus in condensed structures called Polycomb bodies. The PRC1 subunit Polyhomeotic (Ph) contains an oligomerizing sterile alpha motif (SAM) that is implicated in both PcG body formation and chromatin organization in <i>Drosophila</i> and mammalian cells. A truncated version of Ph containing the SAM (mini-Ph) forms phase-separated condensates with DNA or chromatin in vitro, suggesting that PcG bodies may form through SAM-driven phase separation. In cells, Ph forms multiple small condensates, while mini-Ph typically forms a single large nuclear condensate. We therefore hypothesized that sequences outside of mini-Ph, which are predicted to be intrinsically disordered, are required for proper condensate formation. We identified three distinct low-complexity regions in Ph based on sequence composition. We systematically tested the role of each of these sequences in Ph condensates using live imaging of transfected <i>Drosophila</i> S2 cells. Each sequence uniquely affected Ph SAM-dependent condensate size, number, and morphology, but the most dramatic effects occurred when the central, glutamine-rich intrinsically disordered region (IDR) was removed, which resulted in large Ph condensates. Like mini-Ph condensates, condensates lacking the glutamine-rich IDR excluded chromatin. Chromatin fractionation experiments indicated that the removal of the glutamine-rich IDR reduced chromatin binding and that the removal of either of the other IDRs increased chromatin binding. Our data suggest that all three IDRs, and functional interactions among them, regulate Ph condensate size and number. Our results can be explained by a model in which tight chromatin binding by Ph IDRs antagonizes Ph SAM-driven phase separation. Our observations highlight the complexity of regulation of biological condensates housed in single proteins.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epigenomes\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680516/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epigenomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/epigenomes6040040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epigenomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/epigenomes6040040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

Polycomb基团(PcG)复合物PRC1位于细胞核中称为Polycomb小体的浓缩结构中。PRC1亚基Polyhomeotic (Ph)含有一个寡聚化的不育α基序(SAM),该基序与果蝇和哺乳动物细胞的PcG体形成和染色质组织有关。含有SAM的截断版Ph (mini-Ph)在体外与DNA或染色质形成相分离凝聚物,表明PcG小体可能通过SAM驱动的相分离形成。在细胞中,Ph值形成多个小的凝聚物,而微Ph值通常形成一个大的核凝聚物。因此,我们假设,在迷你ph值之外的序列,被预测为本质上无序的,是适当凝聚形成所必需的。我们根据序列组成确定了Ph中三个不同的低复杂性区域。我们利用转染的果蝇S2细胞的实时成像系统地测试了这些序列在Ph凝聚物中的作用。每个序列都独特地影响Ph sam依赖的凝聚物大小、数量和形态,但最显著的影响发生在中心的富含谷氨酰胺的内在无序区(IDR)被去除时,这导致了大的Ph凝聚物。像微ph凝聚物一样,缺乏富含谷氨酰胺的IDR的凝聚物排除了染色质。染色质分离实验表明,去除富含谷氨酰胺的IDR减少了染色质结合,而去除其他IDR则增加了染色质结合。我们的数据表明,这三种idr以及它们之间的功能相互作用调节Ph凝聚物的大小和数量。我们的结果可以用一个模型来解释,在这个模型中,Ph IDRs与染色质的紧密结合拮抗Ph sam驱动的相分离。我们的观察突出了单一蛋白质中生物凝聚物调控的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Regulation of Polyhomeotic Condensates by Intrinsically Disordered Sequences That Affect Chromatin Binding.

Regulation of Polyhomeotic Condensates by Intrinsically Disordered Sequences That Affect Chromatin Binding.

Regulation of Polyhomeotic Condensates by Intrinsically Disordered Sequences That Affect Chromatin Binding.

Regulation of Polyhomeotic Condensates by Intrinsically Disordered Sequences That Affect Chromatin Binding.

The Polycomb group (PcG) complex PRC1 localizes in the nucleus in condensed structures called Polycomb bodies. The PRC1 subunit Polyhomeotic (Ph) contains an oligomerizing sterile alpha motif (SAM) that is implicated in both PcG body formation and chromatin organization in Drosophila and mammalian cells. A truncated version of Ph containing the SAM (mini-Ph) forms phase-separated condensates with DNA or chromatin in vitro, suggesting that PcG bodies may form through SAM-driven phase separation. In cells, Ph forms multiple small condensates, while mini-Ph typically forms a single large nuclear condensate. We therefore hypothesized that sequences outside of mini-Ph, which are predicted to be intrinsically disordered, are required for proper condensate formation. We identified three distinct low-complexity regions in Ph based on sequence composition. We systematically tested the role of each of these sequences in Ph condensates using live imaging of transfected Drosophila S2 cells. Each sequence uniquely affected Ph SAM-dependent condensate size, number, and morphology, but the most dramatic effects occurred when the central, glutamine-rich intrinsically disordered region (IDR) was removed, which resulted in large Ph condensates. Like mini-Ph condensates, condensates lacking the glutamine-rich IDR excluded chromatin. Chromatin fractionation experiments indicated that the removal of the glutamine-rich IDR reduced chromatin binding and that the removal of either of the other IDRs increased chromatin binding. Our data suggest that all three IDRs, and functional interactions among them, regulate Ph condensate size and number. Our results can be explained by a model in which tight chromatin binding by Ph IDRs antagonizes Ph SAM-driven phase separation. Our observations highlight the complexity of regulation of biological condensates housed in single proteins.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epigenomes
Epigenomes GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信