2017年全球疾病负担估计:对流行病学证据的批判性评估。

R Lyus, C Buamah, A M Pollock, L Cosgrove, P Brhlikova
{"title":"2017年全球疾病负担估计:对流行病学证据的批判性评估。","authors":"R Lyus,&nbsp;C Buamah,&nbsp;A M Pollock,&nbsp;L Cosgrove,&nbsp;P Brhlikova","doi":"10.1177/20542704231197594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To critically appraise the quality of the studies underpinning the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2017 estimates for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) with respect to i) the GBD 2017 inclusion criteria and ii) population coverage.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic critical appraisal.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Each study was critically appraised with respect to the four GBD 2017 inclusion criteria: representativeness, study method and sample, diagnostic criteria and publication from 1980 onwards. Population coverage was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Less than half of studies (221/467, 47.3%) were nationally representative. Only 262/467 (56.1%) of studies reported specifically on MDD and more than a third did not use DSM or ICD diagnostic criteria: 94/467 (20.1%) did not specify any diagnostic criteria and 68/467 (14.6%) relied on self-reported depression for diagnosis. Only 62/467 (13.3%) of studies were conducted during the period 2011-2017. Only 107/195 (54.9%) of countries had one or more prevalence studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GBD 2017 estimates for MDD are based on incomplete country and population coverage. The inclusion of studies with non-representative populations, that do not use diagnostic criteria and the lack of specific data on MDD reduces the reliability of estimates and limits their value for policy making.</p>","PeriodicalId":17674,"journal":{"name":"JRSM Open","volume":"14 9","pages":"20542704231197594"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/86/8b/10.1177_20542704231197594.PMC10501079.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Burden of Disease 2017 estimates for Major Depressive Disorder: a critical appraisal of the epidemiological evidence.\",\"authors\":\"R Lyus,&nbsp;C Buamah,&nbsp;A M Pollock,&nbsp;L Cosgrove,&nbsp;P Brhlikova\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20542704231197594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To critically appraise the quality of the studies underpinning the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2017 estimates for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) with respect to i) the GBD 2017 inclusion criteria and ii) population coverage.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic critical appraisal.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Each study was critically appraised with respect to the four GBD 2017 inclusion criteria: representativeness, study method and sample, diagnostic criteria and publication from 1980 onwards. Population coverage was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Less than half of studies (221/467, 47.3%) were nationally representative. Only 262/467 (56.1%) of studies reported specifically on MDD and more than a third did not use DSM or ICD diagnostic criteria: 94/467 (20.1%) did not specify any diagnostic criteria and 68/467 (14.6%) relied on self-reported depression for diagnosis. Only 62/467 (13.3%) of studies were conducted during the period 2011-2017. Only 107/195 (54.9%) of countries had one or more prevalence studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GBD 2017 estimates for MDD are based on incomplete country and population coverage. The inclusion of studies with non-representative populations, that do not use diagnostic criteria and the lack of specific data on MDD reduces the reliability of estimates and limits their value for policy making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JRSM Open\",\"volume\":\"14 9\",\"pages\":\"20542704231197594\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/86/8b/10.1177_20542704231197594.PMC10501079.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JRSM Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20542704231197594\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20542704231197594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:从i) GBD 2017纳入标准和ii)人口覆盖率方面,批判性地评估支撑2017年全球疾病负担(GBD)估计的研究质量。设计:系统的批判性评估。设置:不适用。参与者:不适用。主要结局指标:每项研究都根据GBD 2017的四项纳入标准进行了严格评估:代表性、研究方法和样本、诊断标准和1980年以来的发表。计算了人口覆盖率。结果:不到一半的研究(221/467,47.3%)具有全国代表性。只有262/467(56.1%)的研究专门报道了重度抑郁症,超过三分之一的研究没有使用DSM或ICD诊断标准:94/467(20.1%)没有指定任何诊断标准,68/467(14.6%)依赖于自我报告的抑郁症进行诊断。只有62/467(13.3%)的研究是在2011-2017年期间进行的。只有107/195(54.9%)的国家进行了一项或多项流行病学研究。结论:2017年对MDD的GBD估计是基于不完整的国家和人口覆盖。纳入非代表性人群的研究,不使用诊断标准,缺乏关于重度抑郁症的具体数据,降低了估计的可靠性,限制了它们对政策制定的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Global Burden of Disease 2017 estimates for Major Depressive Disorder: a critical appraisal of the epidemiological evidence.

Global Burden of Disease 2017 estimates for Major Depressive Disorder: a critical appraisal of the epidemiological evidence.

Global Burden of Disease 2017 estimates for Major Depressive Disorder: a critical appraisal of the epidemiological evidence.

Global Burden of Disease 2017 estimates for Major Depressive Disorder: a critical appraisal of the epidemiological evidence.

Objectives: To critically appraise the quality of the studies underpinning the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2017 estimates for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) with respect to i) the GBD 2017 inclusion criteria and ii) population coverage.

Design: Systematic critical appraisal.

Setting: Not applicable.

Participants: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: Each study was critically appraised with respect to the four GBD 2017 inclusion criteria: representativeness, study method and sample, diagnostic criteria and publication from 1980 onwards. Population coverage was calculated.

Results: Less than half of studies (221/467, 47.3%) were nationally representative. Only 262/467 (56.1%) of studies reported specifically on MDD and more than a third did not use DSM or ICD diagnostic criteria: 94/467 (20.1%) did not specify any diagnostic criteria and 68/467 (14.6%) relied on self-reported depression for diagnosis. Only 62/467 (13.3%) of studies were conducted during the period 2011-2017. Only 107/195 (54.9%) of countries had one or more prevalence studies.

Conclusions: GBD 2017 estimates for MDD are based on incomplete country and population coverage. The inclusion of studies with non-representative populations, that do not use diagnostic criteria and the lack of specific data on MDD reduces the reliability of estimates and limits their value for policy making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JRSM Open is a peer reviewed online-only journal that follows the open-access publishing model. It is a companion journal to the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. The journal publishes research papers, research letters, clinical and methodological reviews, and case reports. Our aim is to inform practice and policy making in clinical medicine. The journal has an international and multispecialty readership that includes primary care and public health professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信