肝细胞癌和Child-Turcotte-Pugh B级患者的预后因素。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Chia-Chu Fu, Yu-Jen Chen, Chien-Wei Su, Cheng-Yi Wei, Chi-Jen Chu, Pei-Chang Lee, Teh-Ia Huo, Yi-Hsiang Huang, Hui-Chun Huang, Jaw-Ching Wu, Ming-Chih Hou
{"title":"肝细胞癌和Child-Turcotte-Pugh B级患者的预后因素。","authors":"Chia-Chu Fu,&nbsp;Yu-Jen Chen,&nbsp;Chien-Wei Su,&nbsp;Cheng-Yi Wei,&nbsp;Chi-Jen Chu,&nbsp;Pei-Chang Lee,&nbsp;Teh-Ia Huo,&nbsp;Yi-Hsiang Huang,&nbsp;Hui-Chun Huang,&nbsp;Jaw-Ching Wu,&nbsp;Ming-Chih Hou","doi":"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score is widely used for assessing the liver's functional reserve in patients with advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aims to explore the outcomes of patients with HCC and CTP class B and to investigate the prognostic accuracy of prediction models for ACLD in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively enrolled 1143 patients with HCC and CTP class B between 2007 and 2022. We divided the patients into three subgroups based on their CTP scores: CTP-B7, CTP-B8, and CTP-B9. We compared the corrected Akaike information criterion among each mortality prediction model, including the CTP score, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score, modified ALBI score, the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), and MELD 3.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the enrolled patients, 576 (50.3%) were in the CTP-B7 group, 363 (31.8%) were in the CTP-B8 group, and 204 (17.9%) were in the CTP-B9 group. After a median follow-up of 4.6 months (interquartile range IQR 1.8-17.2 months), 963 patients died, and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 11.4%. The 5-year OS rates were 11.6%, 13.6%, and 8.3% in the CTP-B7, CTP-B8, and CTP-B9 groups, respectively. Patients in the CTP-B7 group and CTP-B8 group had comparable OS ( p = 0.089), both of which were better than those in the CTP-B9 group ( p < 0.001). Furthermore, the MELD 3.0 score had the lowest corrected akaike information criteria value and provided a more accurate mortality prediction than the MELD score, ALBI grade, modified ALBI grade, and CTP score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients in the CTP-B7 and CTP-B8 groups had comparable OS, both of which were better than those in the CTP-B9 group. Moreover, MELD 3.0 provided the most accurate mortality prediction in patients with HCC and CTP class B.</p>","PeriodicalId":17251,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"876-884"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B.\",\"authors\":\"Chia-Chu Fu,&nbsp;Yu-Jen Chen,&nbsp;Chien-Wei Su,&nbsp;Cheng-Yi Wei,&nbsp;Chi-Jen Chu,&nbsp;Pei-Chang Lee,&nbsp;Teh-Ia Huo,&nbsp;Yi-Hsiang Huang,&nbsp;Hui-Chun Huang,&nbsp;Jaw-Ching Wu,&nbsp;Ming-Chih Hou\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score is widely used for assessing the liver's functional reserve in patients with advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aims to explore the outcomes of patients with HCC and CTP class B and to investigate the prognostic accuracy of prediction models for ACLD in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively enrolled 1143 patients with HCC and CTP class B between 2007 and 2022. We divided the patients into three subgroups based on their CTP scores: CTP-B7, CTP-B8, and CTP-B9. We compared the corrected Akaike information criterion among each mortality prediction model, including the CTP score, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score, modified ALBI score, the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), and MELD 3.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the enrolled patients, 576 (50.3%) were in the CTP-B7 group, 363 (31.8%) were in the CTP-B8 group, and 204 (17.9%) were in the CTP-B9 group. After a median follow-up of 4.6 months (interquartile range IQR 1.8-17.2 months), 963 patients died, and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 11.4%. The 5-year OS rates were 11.6%, 13.6%, and 8.3% in the CTP-B7, CTP-B8, and CTP-B9 groups, respectively. Patients in the CTP-B7 group and CTP-B8 group had comparable OS ( p = 0.089), both of which were better than those in the CTP-B9 group ( p < 0.001). Furthermore, the MELD 3.0 score had the lowest corrected akaike information criteria value and provided a more accurate mortality prediction than the MELD score, ALBI grade, modified ALBI grade, and CTP score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients in the CTP-B7 and CTP-B8 groups had comparable OS, both of which were better than those in the CTP-B9 group. Moreover, MELD 3.0 provided the most accurate mortality prediction in patients with HCC and CTP class B.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"876-884\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000975\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000975","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Child-Turcotte-Pugh(CTP)评分广泛用于评估晚期慢性肝病(ACLD)和肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的肝脏功能储备。本研究旨在探讨HCC和CTP B类患者的预后,并研究ACLD预测模型在这些患者中的预后准确性。方法:我们对2007年至2022年间1143例肝细胞癌和CTP B级患者进行了回顾性研究。我们根据CTP评分将患者分为三个亚组:CTP-B7、CTP-B8和CTP-B9。我们比较了每个死亡率预测模型的校正Akaike信息标准,包括CTP评分、白蛋白-胆红素(ALBI)评分、改良ALBI评分、终末期肝病模型(MELD)和MELD 3.0。结果:在入选患者中,CTP-B7组576例(50.3%),CTP-B8组363例(31.8%),CTP-B9组204例(17.9%)。中位随访4.6个月(四分位数IQR 1.8-17.2个月)后,963名患者死亡,5年总生存率(OS)为11.4%。CTP-B7、CTP-B8和CTP-B9组的5年OS率分别为11.6%、13.6%和8.3%。CTP-B7组和CTP-B8组患者的OS相当(p=0.089),均优于CTP-B9组(p<0.001)。此外,MELD 3.0评分的校正akaike信息标准值最低,比MELD评分、ALBI评分、改良ALBI评分和CTP评分提供了更准确的死亡率预测。结论:CTP-B7和CTP-B8组患者的OS相似,均优于CTP-B9组。此外,MELD 3.0为HCC和CTP B级患者提供了最准确的死亡率预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B.

Background: The Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score is widely used for assessing the liver's functional reserve in patients with advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aims to explore the outcomes of patients with HCC and CTP class B and to investigate the prognostic accuracy of prediction models for ACLD in these patients.

Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 1143 patients with HCC and CTP class B between 2007 and 2022. We divided the patients into three subgroups based on their CTP scores: CTP-B7, CTP-B8, and CTP-B9. We compared the corrected Akaike information criterion among each mortality prediction model, including the CTP score, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score, modified ALBI score, the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), and MELD 3.0.

Results: Among the enrolled patients, 576 (50.3%) were in the CTP-B7 group, 363 (31.8%) were in the CTP-B8 group, and 204 (17.9%) were in the CTP-B9 group. After a median follow-up of 4.6 months (interquartile range IQR 1.8-17.2 months), 963 patients died, and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 11.4%. The 5-year OS rates were 11.6%, 13.6%, and 8.3% in the CTP-B7, CTP-B8, and CTP-B9 groups, respectively. Patients in the CTP-B7 group and CTP-B8 group had comparable OS ( p = 0.089), both of which were better than those in the CTP-B9 group ( p < 0.001). Furthermore, the MELD 3.0 score had the lowest corrected akaike information criteria value and provided a more accurate mortality prediction than the MELD score, ALBI grade, modified ALBI grade, and CTP score.

Conclusion: Patients in the CTP-B7 and CTP-B8 groups had comparable OS, both of which were better than those in the CTP-B9 group. Moreover, MELD 3.0 provided the most accurate mortality prediction in patients with HCC and CTP class B.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
320
审稿时长
15.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, previously known as the Chinese Medical Journal (Taipei), has a long history of publishing scientific papers and has continuously made substantial contribution in the understanding and progress of a broad range of biomedical sciences. It is published monthly by Wolters Kluwer Health and indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), MEDLINE®, Index Medicus, EMBASE, CAB Abstracts, Sociedad Iberoamericana de Informacion Cientifica (SIIC) Data Bases, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Global Health. JCMA is the official and open access journal of the Chinese Medical Association, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China and is an international forum for scholarly reports in medicine, surgery, dentistry and basic research in biomedical science. As a vehicle of communication and education among physicians and scientists, the journal is open to the use of diverse methodological approaches. Reports of professional practice will need to demonstrate academic robustness and scientific rigor. Outstanding scholars are invited to give their update reviews on the perspectives of the evidence-based science in the related research field. Article types accepted include review articles, original articles, case reports, brief communications and letters to the editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信