髋关节和腰椎之间的t评分不一致:危险因素和临床意义。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Ming-Hsiu Chiang, Yeu-Chai Jang, Yu-Pin Chen, Wing P Chan, Ying-Chin Lin, Shu-Wei Huang, Yi-Jie Kuo
{"title":"髋关节和腰椎之间的t评分不一致:危险因素和临床意义。","authors":"Ming-Hsiu Chiang,&nbsp;Yeu-Chai Jang,&nbsp;Yu-Pin Chen,&nbsp;Wing P Chan,&nbsp;Ying-Chin Lin,&nbsp;Shu-Wei Huang,&nbsp;Yi-Jie Kuo","doi":"10.1177/1759720X231177147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong><i>T</i>-score discordance is common in osteoporosis diagnosis and leads to problems for clinicians formulating treatment plans.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigated the potential predictors of <i>T</i>-score discordance and compared fracture risk among individuals with varying <i>T</i>-score discordance status.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a single-center cross-sectional study conducted at Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei City, between 1 February 2020 and 31 January 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study enrolled patients aged ⩾50 years who received advanced bone health examination. Participants with a history of fracture surgery or underlying musculoskeletal diseases were excluded. Bioelectrical impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry were used to determine the body composition and <i>T</i>-score, respectively. Discordance was defined as different <i>T</i>-score categories between the lumbar spine and hip. The impact of discordance on an individual's fracture risk was assessed using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study enrolled 1402 participants (181 men and 1221 women). Of the 912 participants diagnosed with osteoporosis, 47 (5%) and 364 (40%) were categorized as having major and minor discordance, respectively. Multinomial logistic regression revealed that decreased walking speed was significantly correlated with major discordance but not osteoporosis in both the hip and lumbar spine (odds ratio of 0.25, <i>p</i> = 0.04). The adjusted FRAX scores for the major osteoporotic fracture risks of the major and minor discordance groups were approximately 14%, which was significantly lower than that of people having osteoporosis in both the hip and lumbar spine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Walking speed exhibited the most significant correlation with major discordance in patients with osteoporosis. Although adjusted major fracture risks were similar between the major and minor discordance groups, further longitudinal studies are warranted to confirm this finding.</p><p><strong>Registrations: </strong>This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Taipei Medical University on 01/04/2022 (TMU-JIRB N202203088).</p>","PeriodicalId":23056,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease","volume":"15 ","pages":"1759720X231177147"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cf/c8/10.1177_1759720X231177147.PMC10286209.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>T</i>-score discordance between hip and lumbar spine: risk factors and clinical implications.\",\"authors\":\"Ming-Hsiu Chiang,&nbsp;Yeu-Chai Jang,&nbsp;Yu-Pin Chen,&nbsp;Wing P Chan,&nbsp;Ying-Chin Lin,&nbsp;Shu-Wei Huang,&nbsp;Yi-Jie Kuo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1759720X231177147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong><i>T</i>-score discordance is common in osteoporosis diagnosis and leads to problems for clinicians formulating treatment plans.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigated the potential predictors of <i>T</i>-score discordance and compared fracture risk among individuals with varying <i>T</i>-score discordance status.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a single-center cross-sectional study conducted at Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei City, between 1 February 2020 and 31 January 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study enrolled patients aged ⩾50 years who received advanced bone health examination. Participants with a history of fracture surgery or underlying musculoskeletal diseases were excluded. Bioelectrical impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry were used to determine the body composition and <i>T</i>-score, respectively. Discordance was defined as different <i>T</i>-score categories between the lumbar spine and hip. The impact of discordance on an individual's fracture risk was assessed using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study enrolled 1402 participants (181 men and 1221 women). Of the 912 participants diagnosed with osteoporosis, 47 (5%) and 364 (40%) were categorized as having major and minor discordance, respectively. Multinomial logistic regression revealed that decreased walking speed was significantly correlated with major discordance but not osteoporosis in both the hip and lumbar spine (odds ratio of 0.25, <i>p</i> = 0.04). The adjusted FRAX scores for the major osteoporotic fracture risks of the major and minor discordance groups were approximately 14%, which was significantly lower than that of people having osteoporosis in both the hip and lumbar spine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Walking speed exhibited the most significant correlation with major discordance in patients with osteoporosis. Although adjusted major fracture risks were similar between the major and minor discordance groups, further longitudinal studies are warranted to confirm this finding.</p><p><strong>Registrations: </strong>This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Taipei Medical University on 01/04/2022 (TMU-JIRB N202203088).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"1759720X231177147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cf/c8/10.1177_1759720X231177147.PMC10286209.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X231177147\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X231177147","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:t评分不一致在骨质疏松症诊断中很常见,给临床医生制定治疗方案带来了困难。目的:本研究探讨了t评分不一致的潜在预测因素,并比较了不同t评分不一致状态个体的骨折风险。设计:这是一项单中心横断面研究,于2020年2月1日至2022年1月31日在台北市万方医院进行。方法:本研究招募了接受晚期骨骼健康检查的年龄大于或等于50岁的患者。有骨折手术史或潜在肌肉骨骼疾病的参与者被排除在外。采用生物电阻抗分析和双能x线吸收仪分别测定体成分和t评分。不一致被定义为腰椎和髋关节之间不同的t评分类别。使用骨折风险评估工具(FRAX)评估不一致对个体骨折风险的影响。结果:本研究招募了1402名参与者(181名男性和1221名女性)。在912名被诊断为骨质疏松症的参与者中,分别有47名(5%)和364名(40%)被归类为有严重和轻微不一致。多项logistic回归显示,行走速度的降低与髋关节和腰椎的主要不一致显著相关,但与骨质疏松症无关(比值比为0.25,p = 0.04)。主要和次要不一致组的主要骨质疏松性骨折风险的调整FRAX评分约为14%,显着低于髋关节和腰椎骨质疏松症患者。结论:骨质疏松患者步行速度与主要不协调的相关性最显著。虽然调整后的主要骨折风险在主要不一致组和次要不一致组之间相似,但进一步的纵向研究有必要证实这一发现。注册:本研究已于2022年4月1日获得台北医科大学伦理委员会批准(TMU-JIRB N202203088)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

<i>T</i>-score discordance between hip and lumbar spine: risk factors and clinical implications.

<i>T</i>-score discordance between hip and lumbar spine: risk factors and clinical implications.

<i>T</i>-score discordance between hip and lumbar spine: risk factors and clinical implications.

T-score discordance between hip and lumbar spine: risk factors and clinical implications.

Background: T-score discordance is common in osteoporosis diagnosis and leads to problems for clinicians formulating treatment plans.

Objectives: This study investigated the potential predictors of T-score discordance and compared fracture risk among individuals with varying T-score discordance status.

Design: This was a single-center cross-sectional study conducted at Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei City, between 1 February 2020 and 31 January 2022.

Methods: The present study enrolled patients aged ⩾50 years who received advanced bone health examination. Participants with a history of fracture surgery or underlying musculoskeletal diseases were excluded. Bioelectrical impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry were used to determine the body composition and T-score, respectively. Discordance was defined as different T-score categories between the lumbar spine and hip. The impact of discordance on an individual's fracture risk was assessed using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX).

Results: This study enrolled 1402 participants (181 men and 1221 women). Of the 912 participants diagnosed with osteoporosis, 47 (5%) and 364 (40%) were categorized as having major and minor discordance, respectively. Multinomial logistic regression revealed that decreased walking speed was significantly correlated with major discordance but not osteoporosis in both the hip and lumbar spine (odds ratio of 0.25, p = 0.04). The adjusted FRAX scores for the major osteoporotic fracture risks of the major and minor discordance groups were approximately 14%, which was significantly lower than that of people having osteoporosis in both the hip and lumbar spine.

Conclusions: Walking speed exhibited the most significant correlation with major discordance in patients with osteoporosis. Although adjusted major fracture risks were similar between the major and minor discordance groups, further longitudinal studies are warranted to confirm this finding.

Registrations: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Taipei Medical University on 01/04/2022 (TMU-JIRB N202203088).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of musculoskeletal disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信