选择与偏见:通过回顾当前的不足和未来的方向来解决临床试验的差异。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Kelsey L. Corrigan , Michael K. Rooney , Ramez Kouzy , Gohar Manzar , Charles R. Thomas Jr. , Ethan B. Ludmir
{"title":"选择与偏见:通过回顾当前的不足和未来的方向来解决临床试验的差异。","authors":"Kelsey L. Corrigan ,&nbsp;Michael K. Rooney ,&nbsp;Ramez Kouzy ,&nbsp;Gohar Manzar ,&nbsp;Charles R. Thomas Jr. ,&nbsp;Ethan B. Ludmir","doi":"10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Growing evidence has demonstrated significant, persistent, and widespread disparities in cancer clinical trial enrollment across myriad disease sites and target populations. Although mechanisms underlying such disparities are complex and multifactorial, clinical trial eligibility criteria may serve as a key structural barrier to equitable and diverse trial enrollment. In this review, we provide an overview of the data describing historical and current disparities in cancer clinical trial enrollment and subsequently describe several patient-, institution-, and trial-related factors which appear to be key drivers of enrollment inequity, with specific discussion regarding the impact of eligibility criteria. We further describe the landscape of ongoing professional efforts aimed at eliminating clinical trial disparities through various medical, professional, and advocacy groups. The review concludes with a practical discussion of how modernization of eligibility criteria in clinical trials may decrease or eliminate trial disparities, including specific actionable recommendations aimed at improving the quality of future eligibility criteria.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49542,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Radiation Oncology","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 367-373"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selection and Prejudice: Addressing Clinical Trial Disparities With a Review of Current Shortcomings and Future Directions\",\"authors\":\"Kelsey L. Corrigan ,&nbsp;Michael K. Rooney ,&nbsp;Ramez Kouzy ,&nbsp;Gohar Manzar ,&nbsp;Charles R. Thomas Jr. ,&nbsp;Ethan B. Ludmir\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.06.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Growing evidence has demonstrated significant, persistent, and widespread disparities in cancer clinical trial enrollment across myriad disease sites and target populations. Although mechanisms underlying such disparities are complex and multifactorial, clinical trial eligibility criteria may serve as a key structural barrier to equitable and diverse trial enrollment. In this review, we provide an overview of the data describing historical and current disparities in cancer clinical trial enrollment and subsequently describe several patient-, institution-, and trial-related factors which appear to be key drivers of enrollment inequity, with specific discussion regarding the impact of eligibility criteria. We further describe the landscape of ongoing professional efforts aimed at eliminating clinical trial disparities through various medical, professional, and advocacy groups. The review concludes with a practical discussion of how modernization of eligibility criteria in clinical trials may decrease or eliminate trial disparities, including specific actionable recommendations aimed at improving the quality of future eligibility criteria.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"33 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 367-373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053429623000395\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053429623000395","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的证据表明,癌症临床试验注册在无数疾病部位和目标人群中存在显著、持续和广泛的差异。尽管这种差异的潜在机制是复杂和多因素的,但临床试验资格标准可能是公平和多样化试验注册的关键结构性障碍。在这篇综述中,我们概述了描述癌症临床试验注册的历史和当前差异的数据,随后描述了几个患者、机构和试验相关因素,这些因素似乎是注册不公平的关键驱动因素,并具体讨论了资格标准的影响。我们进一步描述了通过各种医疗、专业和倡导团体消除临床试验差异的持续专业努力的前景。该综述最后就临床试验资格标准的现代化如何减少或消除试验差异进行了实际讨论,包括旨在提高未来资格标准质量的具体可行建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selection and Prejudice: Addressing Clinical Trial Disparities With a Review of Current Shortcomings and Future Directions

Growing evidence has demonstrated significant, persistent, and widespread disparities in cancer clinical trial enrollment across myriad disease sites and target populations. Although mechanisms underlying such disparities are complex and multifactorial, clinical trial eligibility criteria may serve as a key structural barrier to equitable and diverse trial enrollment. In this review, we provide an overview of the data describing historical and current disparities in cancer clinical trial enrollment and subsequently describe several patient-, institution-, and trial-related factors which appear to be key drivers of enrollment inequity, with specific discussion regarding the impact of eligibility criteria. We further describe the landscape of ongoing professional efforts aimed at eliminating clinical trial disparities through various medical, professional, and advocacy groups. The review concludes with a practical discussion of how modernization of eligibility criteria in clinical trials may decrease or eliminate trial disparities, including specific actionable recommendations aimed at improving the quality of future eligibility criteria.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Radiation Oncology is compiled by a guest editor to address a specific topic in the specialty, presenting definitive information on areas of rapid change and development. A significant number of articles report new scientific information. Topics covered include tumor biology, diagnosis, medical and surgical management of the patient, and new technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信