夹紧力对三尖瓣环的影响:一种比较。

Jesus Aleman, Amy Adkins, Lori Boies, Fatima Al-Quiati, Edward Sako, Shamik Bhattacharya
{"title":"夹紧力对三尖瓣环的影响:一种比较。","authors":"Jesus Aleman,&nbsp;Amy Adkins,&nbsp;Lori Boies,&nbsp;Fatima Al-Quiati,&nbsp;Edward Sako,&nbsp;Shamik Bhattacharya","doi":"10.4172/2329-9517.1000283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Tricuspid annuloplasty rings are commonly used to cinch an enlarged tricuspid annulus back to its original shape and size in patients with severe functional tricuspid regurgitation. However, the invasive operation is contraindicated for patients at risk for reoperation. Fortunately, transcatheter repair procedures, currently in the development process, are minimally invasive alternatives to current repair techniques. This study aims to determine the species-dependence of cinching force with the potential of informing transcatheter repair design by quantifying the minimum required cinching force necessary to reduce tricuspid regurgitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cinching force necessary to reduce the septal-lateral diameter of a dilated annuls was quantified and compared in ten ovine hearts and nine porcine hearts. Additionally, a deparaffinization protocol and Verhoeff-Van Gieson stain were used to compare the microscopic structure of tissue samples at different stages of the experimental procedure in the two species.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum annulus dilation observed for the porcine was 11.2%, and the maximum cinching force was 0.40 ± 0.12 N. As previously demonstrated, ovine hearts yielded a maximum annulus dilation and cinching force of 8.82% and 0.38 ± 0.09 N respectively. Histological stains revealed no gross tissue differences between ovine and porcine septal or free wall tissues.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cinching force was not species dependent between ovine and porcine models. This study is an essential first step for determining which animal model should be utilized for the development of transcatheter devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":73638,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiovascular diseases & diagnosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2329-9517.1000283","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Cinching Force on the Tricuspid Annulus: A Species Comparison.\",\"authors\":\"Jesus Aleman,&nbsp;Amy Adkins,&nbsp;Lori Boies,&nbsp;Fatima Al-Quiati,&nbsp;Edward Sako,&nbsp;Shamik Bhattacharya\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2329-9517.1000283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Tricuspid annuloplasty rings are commonly used to cinch an enlarged tricuspid annulus back to its original shape and size in patients with severe functional tricuspid regurgitation. However, the invasive operation is contraindicated for patients at risk for reoperation. Fortunately, transcatheter repair procedures, currently in the development process, are minimally invasive alternatives to current repair techniques. This study aims to determine the species-dependence of cinching force with the potential of informing transcatheter repair design by quantifying the minimum required cinching force necessary to reduce tricuspid regurgitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cinching force necessary to reduce the septal-lateral diameter of a dilated annuls was quantified and compared in ten ovine hearts and nine porcine hearts. Additionally, a deparaffinization protocol and Verhoeff-Van Gieson stain were used to compare the microscopic structure of tissue samples at different stages of the experimental procedure in the two species.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum annulus dilation observed for the porcine was 11.2%, and the maximum cinching force was 0.40 ± 0.12 N. As previously demonstrated, ovine hearts yielded a maximum annulus dilation and cinching force of 8.82% and 0.38 ± 0.09 N respectively. Histological stains revealed no gross tissue differences between ovine and porcine septal or free wall tissues.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cinching force was not species dependent between ovine and porcine models. This study is an essential first step for determining which animal model should be utilized for the development of transcatheter devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiovascular diseases & diagnosis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2329-9517.1000283\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiovascular diseases & diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-9517.1000283\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiovascular diseases & diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-9517.1000283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:三尖瓣环成形术常用于严重功能性三尖瓣反流患者,将扩大的三尖瓣环固定到原来的形状和大小。然而,对于有再次手术风险的患者,这种侵入性手术是禁忌的。幸运的是,目前正在开发的经导管修复程序是目前修复技术的微创替代方案。本研究旨在通过量化减少三尖瓣反流所需的最小锁紧力,确定锁紧力的物种依赖性,并为经导管修复设计提供潜在信息。方法:对10例羊心脏和9例猪心脏进行定量分析,并对缩小扩张环隔外侧直径所需的夹紧力进行比较。此外,我们还使用脱蜡程序和verhoefff - van Gieson染色来比较这两个物种在实验过程的不同阶段组织样品的微观结构。结果:猪心脏的最大环扩张率为11.2%,最大夹带力为0.40±0.12 N。如先前所示,羊心脏的最大环扩张率和最大夹带力分别为8.82%和0.38±0.09 N。组织学染色显示,羊和猪的隔膜或游离壁组织没有明显的组织差异。结论:羊和猪模型的握力不存在物种依赖性。这项研究是确定哪种动物模型应该用于开发经导管装置的重要的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of Cinching Force on the Tricuspid Annulus: A Species Comparison.

Effects of Cinching Force on the Tricuspid Annulus: A Species Comparison.

Effects of Cinching Force on the Tricuspid Annulus: A Species Comparison.

Effects of Cinching Force on the Tricuspid Annulus: A Species Comparison.

Purpose: Tricuspid annuloplasty rings are commonly used to cinch an enlarged tricuspid annulus back to its original shape and size in patients with severe functional tricuspid regurgitation. However, the invasive operation is contraindicated for patients at risk for reoperation. Fortunately, transcatheter repair procedures, currently in the development process, are minimally invasive alternatives to current repair techniques. This study aims to determine the species-dependence of cinching force with the potential of informing transcatheter repair design by quantifying the minimum required cinching force necessary to reduce tricuspid regurgitation.

Methods: The cinching force necessary to reduce the septal-lateral diameter of a dilated annuls was quantified and compared in ten ovine hearts and nine porcine hearts. Additionally, a deparaffinization protocol and Verhoeff-Van Gieson stain were used to compare the microscopic structure of tissue samples at different stages of the experimental procedure in the two species.

Results: The maximum annulus dilation observed for the porcine was 11.2%, and the maximum cinching force was 0.40 ± 0.12 N. As previously demonstrated, ovine hearts yielded a maximum annulus dilation and cinching force of 8.82% and 0.38 ± 0.09 N respectively. Histological stains revealed no gross tissue differences between ovine and porcine septal or free wall tissues.

Conclusion: The cinching force was not species dependent between ovine and porcine models. This study is an essential first step for determining which animal model should be utilized for the development of transcatheter devices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信