Huyen Pham, Chunqing Lin, Yuhui Zhu, Sarah E Clingan, Lewei Allison Lin, Larissa J Mooney, Sean M Murphy, Cynthia I Campbell, Yanping Liu, Yih-Ing Hser
{"title":"针对药物使用障碍的远程医疗:范围综述。","authors":"Huyen Pham, Chunqing Lin, Yuhui Zhu, Sarah E Clingan, Lewei Allison Lin, Larissa J Mooney, Sean M Murphy, Cynthia I Campbell, Yanping Liu, Yih-Ing Hser","doi":"10.1177/1357633X231190945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionThe COVID pandemic prompted a significant increase in the utilization of telemedicine (TM) for substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. As we transition towards a \"new normal\" policy, it is crucial to comprehensively understand the evidence of TM in SUD treatment. This scoping review aims to summarize existing evidence regarding TM's acceptability, quality, effectiveness, access/utilization, and cost in the context of SUD treatment in order to identify knowledge gaps and inform policy decisions regarding TM for SUDs.MethodWe searched studies published in 2012-2022 from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and other sources. Findings were synthesized using thematic analysis.ResultsA total of 856 relevant articles were screened, with a final total of 42 articles included in the review. TM in SUD treatment was perceived to be generally beneficial and acceptable. TM was as effective as in-person SUD care in terms of substance use reduction and treatment retention; however, most studies lacked rigorous designs and follow-up durations were brief (≤3 months). Telephone-based TM platforms (vs video) were positively associated with older age, lower education, and no prior overdose. Providers generally consider TM to be affordable for patients, but no relevant studies were available from patient perspectives.ConclusionsTM in SUD treatment is generally perceived to be beneficial and acceptable and as effective as in-person care, although more rigorously designed studies on effectiveness are still lacking. Access and utilization of TM may vary by platform. TM service quality and costs are the least studied and warrant further investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"359-375"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telemedicine-delivered treatment for substance use disorder: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Huyen Pham, Chunqing Lin, Yuhui Zhu, Sarah E Clingan, Lewei Allison Lin, Larissa J Mooney, Sean M Murphy, Cynthia I Campbell, Yanping Liu, Yih-Ing Hser\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1357633X231190945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>IntroductionThe COVID pandemic prompted a significant increase in the utilization of telemedicine (TM) for substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. As we transition towards a \\\"new normal\\\" policy, it is crucial to comprehensively understand the evidence of TM in SUD treatment. This scoping review aims to summarize existing evidence regarding TM's acceptability, quality, effectiveness, access/utilization, and cost in the context of SUD treatment in order to identify knowledge gaps and inform policy decisions regarding TM for SUDs.MethodWe searched studies published in 2012-2022 from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and other sources. Findings were synthesized using thematic analysis.ResultsA total of 856 relevant articles were screened, with a final total of 42 articles included in the review. TM in SUD treatment was perceived to be generally beneficial and acceptable. TM was as effective as in-person SUD care in terms of substance use reduction and treatment retention; however, most studies lacked rigorous designs and follow-up durations were brief (≤3 months). Telephone-based TM platforms (vs video) were positively associated with older age, lower education, and no prior overdose. Providers generally consider TM to be affordable for patients, but no relevant studies were available from patient perspectives.ConclusionsTM in SUD treatment is generally perceived to be beneficial and acceptable and as effective as in-person care, although more rigorously designed studies on effectiveness are still lacking. Access and utilization of TM may vary by platform. TM service quality and costs are the least studied and warrant further investigations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"359-375\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444076/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X231190945\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X231190945","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:COVID 大流行促使远程医疗 (TM) 在药物使用障碍 (SUD) 治疗中的应用大幅增加。随着我们向 "新常态 "政策过渡,全面了解 TM 在 SUD 治疗中的证据至关重要。本范围综述旨在总结有关 TM 在 SUD 治疗中的可接受性、质量、有效性、可及性/利用率和成本方面的现有证据,以确定知识差距并为有关 TM 治疗 SUD 的政策决策提供信息:我们从 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、Embase、Web of Science 和其他来源检索了 2012-2022 年发表的研究。结果:共检索到 856 篇相关文章:结果:共筛选出 856 篇相关文章,最终共有 42 篇文章被纳入综述。人们普遍认为 TM 在 SUD 治疗中是有益和可接受的。在减少药物使用和保持治疗方面,TM 与面对面的 SUD 治疗同样有效;然而,大多数研究缺乏严格的设计,随访时间也很短(≤3 个月)。基于电话的 TM 平台(与视频相比)与年龄较大、教育程度较低、无药物滥用史呈正相关。医疗服务提供者普遍认为 TM 是患者可以负担得起的,但没有从患者角度进行相关研究:结论:人们普遍认为 TM 在 SUD 治疗中是有益的、可接受的,并且与面对面治疗一样有效,尽管仍然缺乏更严格的有效性研究。远程医疗的获取和利用可能因平台而异。对 TM 服务质量和成本的研究最少,值得进一步调查。
Telemedicine-delivered treatment for substance use disorder: A scoping review.
IntroductionThe COVID pandemic prompted a significant increase in the utilization of telemedicine (TM) for substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. As we transition towards a "new normal" policy, it is crucial to comprehensively understand the evidence of TM in SUD treatment. This scoping review aims to summarize existing evidence regarding TM's acceptability, quality, effectiveness, access/utilization, and cost in the context of SUD treatment in order to identify knowledge gaps and inform policy decisions regarding TM for SUDs.MethodWe searched studies published in 2012-2022 from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and other sources. Findings were synthesized using thematic analysis.ResultsA total of 856 relevant articles were screened, with a final total of 42 articles included in the review. TM in SUD treatment was perceived to be generally beneficial and acceptable. TM was as effective as in-person SUD care in terms of substance use reduction and treatment retention; however, most studies lacked rigorous designs and follow-up durations were brief (≤3 months). Telephone-based TM platforms (vs video) were positively associated with older age, lower education, and no prior overdose. Providers generally consider TM to be affordable for patients, but no relevant studies were available from patient perspectives.ConclusionsTM in SUD treatment is generally perceived to be beneficial and acceptable and as effective as in-person care, although more rigorously designed studies on effectiveness are still lacking. Access and utilization of TM may vary by platform. TM service quality and costs are the least studied and warrant further investigations.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.