2型糖尿病强化和非强化胰岛素治疗方案的回顾性比较。

IF 2.5 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Minerva endocrinology Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-01-12 DOI:10.23736/S2724-6507.20.03323-4
Halit Diri, Bercem Aycicek
{"title":"2型糖尿病强化和非强化胰岛素治疗方案的回顾性比较。","authors":"Halit Diri,&nbsp;Bercem Aycicek","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6507.20.03323-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compared the outcomes between intensive and nonintensive insulin regimens and assessed the predictive factors for failing to achieve the glycated hemoglobin (A1C) goals in type-2-diabetes-mellitus (T2DM) patients requiring insulin therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, retrospective assessment of the medical records of 125 T2DM patients undergoing intensive (46 patients) and nonintensive insulin therapy (79 patients) were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found when the intensive and nonintensive insulin therapy groups were compared in terms of the percentage decreases of glucose and A1C levels. The mean A1C levels of the nonintensive and intensive groups declined from 11.15% and 11.30% to 7.97% and 8.06%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both intensive and nonintensive insulin therapies improved the baseline glycemic parameters but being overweight or obese and/or being reluctant to dietary recommendations led to treatment failures regardless of the insulin regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":18690,"journal":{"name":"Minerva endocrinology","volume":"48 3","pages":"311-317"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A retrospective comparison between intensive and nonintensive insulin regimens in type 2 diabetes mellitus.\",\"authors\":\"Halit Diri,&nbsp;Bercem Aycicek\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-6507.20.03323-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compared the outcomes between intensive and nonintensive insulin regimens and assessed the predictive factors for failing to achieve the glycated hemoglobin (A1C) goals in type-2-diabetes-mellitus (T2DM) patients requiring insulin therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, retrospective assessment of the medical records of 125 T2DM patients undergoing intensive (46 patients) and nonintensive insulin therapy (79 patients) were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found when the intensive and nonintensive insulin therapy groups were compared in terms of the percentage decreases of glucose and A1C levels. The mean A1C levels of the nonintensive and intensive groups declined from 11.15% and 11.30% to 7.97% and 8.06%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both intensive and nonintensive insulin therapies improved the baseline glycemic parameters but being overweight or obese and/or being reluctant to dietary recommendations led to treatment failures regardless of the insulin regimen.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva endocrinology\",\"volume\":\"48 3\",\"pages\":\"311-317\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6507.20.03323-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6507.20.03323-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究比较了强化和非强化胰岛素方案的结果,并评估了需要胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者未能实现糖化血红蛋白(A1C)目标的预测因素。方法:对125例接受强化胰岛素治疗(46例)和非强化胰岛素治疗的T2DM患者(79例)的病历进行单中心回顾性评估。结果:当比较强化和非强化胰岛素治疗组的葡萄糖和A1C水平下降的百分比时,没有发现显著差异。非强化组和强化组的平均A1C水平分别从11.15%和11.30%下降到7.97%和8.06%。结论:强化和非强化胰岛素治疗都能改善基线血糖参数,但无论胰岛素方案如何,超重或肥胖和/或不愿接受饮食建议都会导致治疗失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A retrospective comparison between intensive and nonintensive insulin regimens in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Background: This study compared the outcomes between intensive and nonintensive insulin regimens and assessed the predictive factors for failing to achieve the glycated hemoglobin (A1C) goals in type-2-diabetes-mellitus (T2DM) patients requiring insulin therapy.

Methods: A single-center, retrospective assessment of the medical records of 125 T2DM patients undergoing intensive (46 patients) and nonintensive insulin therapy (79 patients) were conducted.

Results: No significant differences were found when the intensive and nonintensive insulin therapy groups were compared in terms of the percentage decreases of glucose and A1C levels. The mean A1C levels of the nonintensive and intensive groups declined from 11.15% and 11.30% to 7.97% and 8.06%, respectively.

Conclusions: Both intensive and nonintensive insulin therapies improved the baseline glycemic parameters but being overweight or obese and/or being reluctant to dietary recommendations led to treatment failures regardless of the insulin regimen.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
146
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信