北泰晤士多中心服务评估:COVID-19期间的伦理考虑。

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Namithaa Sunil Kumar, Pippa Sipanoun, Mariana Dittborn, Mary Doyle, Sarah Aylett
{"title":"北泰晤士多中心服务评估:COVID-19期间的伦理考虑。","authors":"Namithaa Sunil Kumar,&nbsp;Pippa Sipanoun,&nbsp;Mariana Dittborn,&nbsp;Mary Doyle,&nbsp;Sarah Aylett","doi":"10.1177/14777509211063590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare resources including staff were diverted from paediatric services to support COVID-positive adult patients. Hospital visiting restrictions and reductions in face-to-face paediatric care were also enforced. We investigated the impact of service changes during the first wave of the pandemic on children and young people (CYP), to inform recommendations for maintaining their care during future pandemics.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A multi-centre service evaluation was performed through a survey of consultant paediatricians working within the North Thames Paediatric Network, a group of paediatric services in London. We investigated six areas: redeployment, visiting restrictions, patient safety, vulnerable children, virtual care and ethical issues.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey responses were received from 47 paediatricians across six National Health Service Trusts. Children's right to health was largely believed to be compromised by the prioritisation of adults during the pandemic (81%; <i>n</i> = 33). Sub-optimal paediatric care due to redeployment (61%; <i>n</i> = 28) and the impact of visiting restrictions on CYP's mental health (79%; <i>n</i> = 37) were reported. Decreased hospital attendances of CYP were associated with parental fear of COVID-19 infection-risks (96%; <i>n</i> = 45) and government 'stay at home' advice (89%; <i>n</i> = 42). Reductions in face-to-face care were noted to have disadvantaged those with complex needs, disabilities and safeguarding concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consultant paediatricians perceived that paediatric care was compromised during the first wave of the pandemic, resulting in harm to children. This harm must be minimised in subsequent pandemics. Recommendations for future practice which were developed from our findings are provided, including maintaining face-to-face care for vulnerable children.</p>","PeriodicalId":53540,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9e/d3/10.1177_14777509211063590.PMC10196678.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"North Thames multi-centre service evaluation: Ethical considerations during COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"Namithaa Sunil Kumar,&nbsp;Pippa Sipanoun,&nbsp;Mariana Dittborn,&nbsp;Mary Doyle,&nbsp;Sarah Aylett\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14777509211063590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare resources including staff were diverted from paediatric services to support COVID-positive adult patients. Hospital visiting restrictions and reductions in face-to-face paediatric care were also enforced. We investigated the impact of service changes during the first wave of the pandemic on children and young people (CYP), to inform recommendations for maintaining their care during future pandemics.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A multi-centre service evaluation was performed through a survey of consultant paediatricians working within the North Thames Paediatric Network, a group of paediatric services in London. We investigated six areas: redeployment, visiting restrictions, patient safety, vulnerable children, virtual care and ethical issues.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey responses were received from 47 paediatricians across six National Health Service Trusts. Children's right to health was largely believed to be compromised by the prioritisation of adults during the pandemic (81%; <i>n</i> = 33). Sub-optimal paediatric care due to redeployment (61%; <i>n</i> = 28) and the impact of visiting restrictions on CYP's mental health (79%; <i>n</i> = 37) were reported. Decreased hospital attendances of CYP were associated with parental fear of COVID-19 infection-risks (96%; <i>n</i> = 45) and government 'stay at home' advice (89%; <i>n</i> = 42). Reductions in face-to-face care were noted to have disadvantaged those with complex needs, disabilities and safeguarding concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consultant paediatricians perceived that paediatric care was compromised during the first wave of the pandemic, resulting in harm to children. This harm must be minimised in subsequent pandemics. Recommendations for future practice which were developed from our findings are provided, including maintaining face-to-face care for vulnerable children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Ethics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9e/d3/10.1177_14777509211063590.PMC10196678.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14777509211063590\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14777509211063590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,包括工作人员在内的卫生保健资源从儿科服务转移到支持COVID-19阳性成人患者。医院探视限制和面对面儿科护理的减少也被强制执行。我们调查了第一波大流行期间服务变化对儿童和年轻人(CYP)的影响,以便为在未来大流行期间维持对他们的护理提供建议。设计:通过对在北泰晤士儿科网络(伦敦的一组儿科服务)内工作的顾问儿科医生进行调查,进行了多中心服务评估。我们调查了六个方面:重新部署、访问限制、患者安全、弱势儿童、虚拟护理和道德问题。结果:收到了来自6个国家卫生服务信托基金的47名儿科医生的调查答复。人们普遍认为,在大流行期间,儿童的健康权受到成人优先考虑的影响(81%;n = 33)。由于重新部署导致儿科护理不理想(61%;n = 28)和探视限制对青少年心理健康的影响(79%;N = 37)。CYP的住院率下降与父母对COVID-19感染风险的恐惧相关(96%;N = 45)和政府“待在家里”的建议(89%;n = 42)。人们注意到,面对面护理的减少使那些有复杂需要、残疾和保障问题的人处于不利地位。结论:儿科顾问医生认为,在大流行的第一波期间,儿科护理受到损害,导致儿童受到伤害。在随后的大流行中,必须尽量减少这种危害。根据我们的研究结果提出了对未来实践的建议,包括对弱势儿童进行面对面的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

North Thames multi-centre service evaluation: Ethical considerations during COVID-19.

North Thames multi-centre service evaluation: Ethical considerations during COVID-19.

North Thames multi-centre service evaluation: Ethical considerations during COVID-19.

North Thames multi-centre service evaluation: Ethical considerations during COVID-19.

Objectives: During the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare resources including staff were diverted from paediatric services to support COVID-positive adult patients. Hospital visiting restrictions and reductions in face-to-face paediatric care were also enforced. We investigated the impact of service changes during the first wave of the pandemic on children and young people (CYP), to inform recommendations for maintaining their care during future pandemics.

Design: A multi-centre service evaluation was performed through a survey of consultant paediatricians working within the North Thames Paediatric Network, a group of paediatric services in London. We investigated six areas: redeployment, visiting restrictions, patient safety, vulnerable children, virtual care and ethical issues.

Results: Survey responses were received from 47 paediatricians across six National Health Service Trusts. Children's right to health was largely believed to be compromised by the prioritisation of adults during the pandemic (81%; n = 33). Sub-optimal paediatric care due to redeployment (61%; n = 28) and the impact of visiting restrictions on CYP's mental health (79%; n = 37) were reported. Decreased hospital attendances of CYP were associated with parental fear of COVID-19 infection-risks (96%; n = 45) and government 'stay at home' advice (89%; n = 42). Reductions in face-to-face care were noted to have disadvantaged those with complex needs, disabilities and safeguarding concerns.

Conclusion: Consultant paediatricians perceived that paediatric care was compromised during the first wave of the pandemic, resulting in harm to children. This harm must be minimised in subsequent pandemics. Recommendations for future practice which were developed from our findings are provided, including maintaining face-to-face care for vulnerable children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Ethics
Clinical Ethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信