Colin W Howden, Erin E Cook, Elyse Swallow, Karen Yang, Helen Guo, Corey Pelletier, Rinu Jacob, Kentaro Sugano
{"title":"在日本,幽门螺旋杆菌感染的实际治疗效果与以伏诺普拉赞为基础的质子泵抑制剂治疗相比。","authors":"Colin W Howden, Erin E Cook, Elyse Swallow, Karen Yang, Helen Guo, Corey Pelletier, Rinu Jacob, Kentaro Sugano","doi":"10.1177/17562848231168714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Japanese guidelines recommend triple therapy with vonoprazan or a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) in combination with antibiotics to treat <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> (<i>H. pylori</i>) infection. While studies have shown improved eradication rates and reduced costs with vonoprazan <i>versus</i> PPIs, there is little data describing healthcare resource use (HCRU) and treatment patterns.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare patients treated with a vonoprazan-based or PPI-based regimen for <i>H. pylori</i> infection in Japan in terms of their characteristics, HCRU, healthcare costs, clinical outcomes, and treatment patterns.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective matched cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the Japan Medical Data Center claims database (July 2014-January 2020) to identify adult patients with <i>H. pylori</i> infection and a first observed use of vonoprazan or a PPI in 2015 or later (index date). Patients prescribed a vonoprazan-based or a PPI-based regimen were matched 1:1 using propensity score matching. HCRU, healthcare costs, diagnostic tests, a proxy for <i>H. pylori</i> eradication (i.e. no triple therapy with amoxicillin in combination with metronidazole or clarithromycin >30 days after the index date), and second-line treatment were described during the 12-month follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 25,389 matched pairs, vonoprazan-treated patients had fewer all-cause and <i>H. pylori-</i>related inpatient stays and outpatient visits than PPI-treated patients, resulting in lower all-cause healthcare costs [185,378 Japanese yen (JPY) <i>versus</i> 230,876 JPY, <i>p</i> < 0.001]. Over 80% of patients received a post-treatment test for <i>H. pylori</i>. Fewer vonoprazan-treated than PPI-treated patients subsequently received an additional triple regimen for <i>H. pylori</i> infection (7.1% <i>versus</i> 20.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) or a prescription for vonoprazan or a PPI as monotherapy (12.4% <i>versus</i> 26.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) between 31 days and 12 months after the index date.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with <i>H. pylori</i> infection who were treated with vonoprazan-based therapy had lower rates of subsequent <i>H. pylori</i> treatment, lower overall and <i>H. pylori</i>-related HCRU, and lower healthcare costs than patients treated with PPI-based therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23022,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","volume":"16 ","pages":"17562848231168714"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/28/92/10.1177_17562848231168714.PMC10161293.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world outcomes associated with vonoprazan-based <i>versus</i> proton pump inhibitor-based therapy for <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> infection in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Colin W Howden, Erin E Cook, Elyse Swallow, Karen Yang, Helen Guo, Corey Pelletier, Rinu Jacob, Kentaro Sugano\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17562848231168714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Japanese guidelines recommend triple therapy with vonoprazan or a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) in combination with antibiotics to treat <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> (<i>H. pylori</i>) infection. While studies have shown improved eradication rates and reduced costs with vonoprazan <i>versus</i> PPIs, there is little data describing healthcare resource use (HCRU) and treatment patterns.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare patients treated with a vonoprazan-based or PPI-based regimen for <i>H. pylori</i> infection in Japan in terms of their characteristics, HCRU, healthcare costs, clinical outcomes, and treatment patterns.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective matched cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the Japan Medical Data Center claims database (July 2014-January 2020) to identify adult patients with <i>H. pylori</i> infection and a first observed use of vonoprazan or a PPI in 2015 or later (index date). Patients prescribed a vonoprazan-based or a PPI-based regimen were matched 1:1 using propensity score matching. HCRU, healthcare costs, diagnostic tests, a proxy for <i>H. pylori</i> eradication (i.e. no triple therapy with amoxicillin in combination with metronidazole or clarithromycin >30 days after the index date), and second-line treatment were described during the 12-month follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 25,389 matched pairs, vonoprazan-treated patients had fewer all-cause and <i>H. pylori-</i>related inpatient stays and outpatient visits than PPI-treated patients, resulting in lower all-cause healthcare costs [185,378 Japanese yen (JPY) <i>versus</i> 230,876 JPY, <i>p</i> < 0.001]. Over 80% of patients received a post-treatment test for <i>H. pylori</i>. Fewer vonoprazan-treated than PPI-treated patients subsequently received an additional triple regimen for <i>H. pylori</i> infection (7.1% <i>versus</i> 20.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) or a prescription for vonoprazan or a PPI as monotherapy (12.4% <i>versus</i> 26.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) between 31 days and 12 months after the index date.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with <i>H. pylori</i> infection who were treated with vonoprazan-based therapy had lower rates of subsequent <i>H. pylori</i> treatment, lower overall and <i>H. pylori</i>-related HCRU, and lower healthcare costs than patients treated with PPI-based therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"17562848231168714\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/28/92/10.1177_17562848231168714.PMC10161293.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848231168714\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848231168714","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Real-world outcomes associated with vonoprazan-based versus proton pump inhibitor-based therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection in Japan.
Background: Japanese guidelines recommend triple therapy with vonoprazan or a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) in combination with antibiotics to treat Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. While studies have shown improved eradication rates and reduced costs with vonoprazan versus PPIs, there is little data describing healthcare resource use (HCRU) and treatment patterns.
Objectives: To compare patients treated with a vonoprazan-based or PPI-based regimen for H. pylori infection in Japan in terms of their characteristics, HCRU, healthcare costs, clinical outcomes, and treatment patterns.
Design: Retrospective matched cohort.
Methods: We used data from the Japan Medical Data Center claims database (July 2014-January 2020) to identify adult patients with H. pylori infection and a first observed use of vonoprazan or a PPI in 2015 or later (index date). Patients prescribed a vonoprazan-based or a PPI-based regimen were matched 1:1 using propensity score matching. HCRU, healthcare costs, diagnostic tests, a proxy for H. pylori eradication (i.e. no triple therapy with amoxicillin in combination with metronidazole or clarithromycin >30 days after the index date), and second-line treatment were described during the 12-month follow-up period.
Results: Among 25,389 matched pairs, vonoprazan-treated patients had fewer all-cause and H. pylori-related inpatient stays and outpatient visits than PPI-treated patients, resulting in lower all-cause healthcare costs [185,378 Japanese yen (JPY) versus 230,876 JPY, p < 0.001]. Over 80% of patients received a post-treatment test for H. pylori. Fewer vonoprazan-treated than PPI-treated patients subsequently received an additional triple regimen for H. pylori infection (7.1% versus 20.0%, p < 0.001) or a prescription for vonoprazan or a PPI as monotherapy (12.4% versus 26.4%, p < 0.001) between 31 days and 12 months after the index date.
Conclusion: Patients with H. pylori infection who were treated with vonoprazan-based therapy had lower rates of subsequent H. pylori treatment, lower overall and H. pylori-related HCRU, and lower healthcare costs than patients treated with PPI-based therapy.
期刊介绍:
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology is an open access journal which delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed original research articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at an international audience of clinicians and researchers in gastroenterology and related disciplines, providing an online forum for rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area.
The editors welcome original research articles across all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology.
The journal publishes original research articles and review articles primarily. Original research manuscripts may include laboratory, animal or human/clinical studies – all phases. Letters to the Editor and Case Reports will also be considered.