Scott G. Weiner , Aleta D. Carroll , Nicholas M. Brisbon , Claudia P. Rodriguez , Charles Covahey , Erin J. Stringfellow , Catherine DiGennaro , Mohammad S. Jalali , Sarah E. Wakeman
{"title":"评估阿片类药物过量急诊治疗后纳洛酮处方的差异","authors":"Scott G. Weiner , Aleta D. Carroll , Nicholas M. Brisbon , Claudia P. Rodriguez , Charles Covahey , Erin J. Stringfellow , Catherine DiGennaro , Mohammad S. Jalali , Sarah E. Wakeman","doi":"10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Patients who initially survive opioid-related overdose are at high risk for subsequent mortality. Our health system<span><span> aimed to evaluate the presence of disparities in prescribing </span>naloxone following opioid overdose.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients seen in our health system, which comprises two academic centers and eight community hospitals. Eligible patients had at least one visit to any of our hospital's </span>emergency departments (EDs) with a diagnosis code indicating opioid-related overdose between May 1, 2018, and April 30, 2021. The primary outcome measure was prescription of nasal naloxone after at least one visit for opioid-related overdose during the study period.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The health system had 1348 unique patients who presented 1593 times to at least one of the EDs with opioid overdose. Of included patients, 580 (43.2%) received one or more prescriptions for naloxone. The majority (68.9%, n = 925) were male. For race/ethnicity, 74.5% (1000) were Non-Hispanic White, 8.0% (n = 108) were Non-Hispanic Black, and 13.0% (n = 175) were Hispanic/Latinx. Compared with the reference age group of 16–24 years, only those 65+ were less likely to receive naloxone (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20–0.84). The study found no difference for gender (male aOR 1.23, 95% CI 0.97–1.57 compared to female). Hispanic/Latinx patients were more likely to receive a prescription when compared to Non-Hispanic White patients (aOR 1.72, 95% CI 1.22–2.44), while no difference occurred between Non-Hispanic Black compared to Non-Hispanic White patients (aOR 1.31, 95% CI 0.87–1.98).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Naloxone prescribing after overdose in our system was suboptimal, with fewer than half of patients with an overdose diagnosis code receiving this lifesaving and evidence-based intervention. Patients who were Hispanic/Latinx were more likely to receive naloxone than other race and ethnicity groups, and patients who were older were less likely to receive it. Health systems need ongoing equity-informed implementation of programs to expand access to naloxone to all patients at risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17148,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 108785"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating disparities in prescribing of naloxone after emergency department treatment of opioid overdose\",\"authors\":\"Scott G. Weiner , Aleta D. Carroll , Nicholas M. Brisbon , Claudia P. Rodriguez , Charles Covahey , Erin J. Stringfellow , Catherine DiGennaro , Mohammad S. Jalali , Sarah E. Wakeman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Patients who initially survive opioid-related overdose are at high risk for subsequent mortality. Our health system<span><span> aimed to evaluate the presence of disparities in prescribing </span>naloxone following opioid overdose.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients seen in our health system, which comprises two academic centers and eight community hospitals. Eligible patients had at least one visit to any of our hospital's </span>emergency departments (EDs) with a diagnosis code indicating opioid-related overdose between May 1, 2018, and April 30, 2021. The primary outcome measure was prescription of nasal naloxone after at least one visit for opioid-related overdose during the study period.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The health system had 1348 unique patients who presented 1593 times to at least one of the EDs with opioid overdose. Of included patients, 580 (43.2%) received one or more prescriptions for naloxone. The majority (68.9%, n = 925) were male. For race/ethnicity, 74.5% (1000) were Non-Hispanic White, 8.0% (n = 108) were Non-Hispanic Black, and 13.0% (n = 175) were Hispanic/Latinx. Compared with the reference age group of 16–24 years, only those 65+ were less likely to receive naloxone (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20–0.84). The study found no difference for gender (male aOR 1.23, 95% CI 0.97–1.57 compared to female). Hispanic/Latinx patients were more likely to receive a prescription when compared to Non-Hispanic White patients (aOR 1.72, 95% CI 1.22–2.44), while no difference occurred between Non-Hispanic Black compared to Non-Hispanic White patients (aOR 1.31, 95% CI 0.87–1.98).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Naloxone prescribing after overdose in our system was suboptimal, with fewer than half of patients with an overdose diagnosis code receiving this lifesaving and evidence-based intervention. Patients who were Hispanic/Latinx were more likely to receive naloxone than other race and ethnicity groups, and patients who were older were less likely to receive it. Health systems need ongoing equity-informed implementation of programs to expand access to naloxone to all patients at risk.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment\",\"volume\":\"139 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108785\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740547222000678\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740547222000678","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
最初存活的阿片类药物过量患者随后死亡的风险很高。我们的卫生系统旨在评估阿片类药物过量后处方纳洛酮的差异。方法:本研究是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为我国卫生系统中2个学术中心和8个社区医院的患者。符合条件的患者在2018年5月1日至2021年4月30日期间至少有一次就诊于我院的任何急诊科(ed),诊断代码表明阿片类药物相关过量。主要结局指标是在研究期间至少一次阿片类药物过量就诊后鼻腔纳洛酮的处方。结果该卫生系统有1348例阿片类药物过量患者到至少一家急诊科就诊1593次。在纳入的患者中,580例(43.2%)接受过一次或多次纳洛酮处方。绝大多数(68.9%,n = 925)为男性。在种族/民族方面,74.5%(1000)为非西班牙裔白人,8.0% (n = 108)为非西班牙裔黑人,13.0% (n = 175)为西班牙裔/拉丁裔。与参考年龄组16-24岁相比,只有65岁以上的患者接受纳洛酮治疗的可能性较低(调整优势比[aOR] 0.41, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.20-0.84)。研究没有发现性别差异(与女性相比,男性aOR 1.23, 95% CI 0.97-1.57)。与非西班牙裔白人患者相比,西班牙裔/拉丁裔患者更有可能获得处方(aOR 1.72, 95% CI 1.22-2.44),而非西班牙裔黑人患者与非西班牙裔白人患者之间没有差异(aOR 1.31, 95% CI 0.87-1.98)。结论在我们的系统中,过量用药后的纳洛酮处方是次优的,只有不到一半的过量诊断代码患者接受了这种挽救生命的循证干预。西班牙裔/拉丁裔患者比其他种族和族裔群体更容易接受纳洛酮,年龄较大的患者接受纳洛酮的可能性较小。卫生系统需要持续地在公平知情的基础上实施规划,扩大所有高危患者获得纳洛酮的机会。
Evaluating disparities in prescribing of naloxone after emergency department treatment of opioid overdose
Introduction
Patients who initially survive opioid-related overdose are at high risk for subsequent mortality. Our health system aimed to evaluate the presence of disparities in prescribing naloxone following opioid overdose.
Methods
This was a retrospective cohort study of patients seen in our health system, which comprises two academic centers and eight community hospitals. Eligible patients had at least one visit to any of our hospital's emergency departments (EDs) with a diagnosis code indicating opioid-related overdose between May 1, 2018, and April 30, 2021. The primary outcome measure was prescription of nasal naloxone after at least one visit for opioid-related overdose during the study period.
Results
The health system had 1348 unique patients who presented 1593 times to at least one of the EDs with opioid overdose. Of included patients, 580 (43.2%) received one or more prescriptions for naloxone. The majority (68.9%, n = 925) were male. For race/ethnicity, 74.5% (1000) were Non-Hispanic White, 8.0% (n = 108) were Non-Hispanic Black, and 13.0% (n = 175) were Hispanic/Latinx. Compared with the reference age group of 16–24 years, only those 65+ were less likely to receive naloxone (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20–0.84). The study found no difference for gender (male aOR 1.23, 95% CI 0.97–1.57 compared to female). Hispanic/Latinx patients were more likely to receive a prescription when compared to Non-Hispanic White patients (aOR 1.72, 95% CI 1.22–2.44), while no difference occurred between Non-Hispanic Black compared to Non-Hispanic White patients (aOR 1.31, 95% CI 0.87–1.98).
Conclusions
Naloxone prescribing after overdose in our system was suboptimal, with fewer than half of patients with an overdose diagnosis code receiving this lifesaving and evidence-based intervention. Patients who were Hispanic/Latinx were more likely to receive naloxone than other race and ethnicity groups, and patients who were older were less likely to receive it. Health systems need ongoing equity-informed implementation of programs to expand access to naloxone to all patients at risk.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (JSAT) features original reviews, training and educational articles, special commentary, and especially research articles that are meaningful to the treatment of alcohol, heroin, marijuana, and other drugs of dependence. JSAT is directed toward treatment practitioners from all disciplines (medicine, nursing, social work, psychology, and counseling) in both private and public sectors, including those involved in schools, health centers, community agencies, correctional facilities, and individual practices. The editors emphasize that JSAT articles should address techniques and treatment approaches that can be used directly by contemporary practitioners.