以色列专科医生对阿片类药物维持治疗的污名和熟悉程度。

IF 4 2区 社会学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Rozner Lihi, Delayahu Yael, Brill Silviu, Sason Anat, Weinstein Marsha, Shoshan Stacy, Schreiber Shaul, Adelson Miriam, Peles Einat
{"title":"以色列专科医生对阿片类药物维持治疗的污名和熟悉程度。","authors":"Rozner Lihi, Delayahu Yael, Brill Silviu, Sason Anat, Weinstein Marsha, Shoshan Stacy, Schreiber Shaul, Adelson Miriam, Peles Einat","doi":"10.1186/s12954-023-00869-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Opioid use disorder (OUD) poses significant public health problems that have increased dramatically, resulting in high rates of morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To minimize the risk of an opioid epidemic in Israel and be prepared, we evaluated physicians' objective knowledge, level of stigma, and approach to prescribing opioids, risk factors, and identification of patients with substance use disorder (SUD), as well as their knowledge about opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) for OUD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anonymous computerized questionnaires were distributed nationally to physicians by the Israel Medical Association. Knowledge, stigma, and approach were scored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of only 249 responders, 58.6% prescribe opioids, 32.1% prescribe cannabis, and 18.5% daily encounter patients with SUD. Logistic regression found the high knowledge group had daily encounters with SUD (Odds Ratio (OR) = 3.5, 95% CI 1.7-7.1) and were familiar with OMT (OR = 10.1, 95% CI 3.5-29.0). The high stigma group was characterized by physicians who prescribe opioids (OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.0-2.9), but who self-reported having limited knowledge regarding OMT (OR = 2, 95% CI 1.1-3.7). The high approach group was characterized by those who prescribe opioids (OR = 11.7, 95% CI 4.9-28), prescribe cannabis (OR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.0-4.3), self-report having limited knowledge regarding OMT (OR = 11.2, 95% CI 1.4-89) and self-report identifying SUD (OR = 32.5, 95% CI 4.1-260).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High stigma was most evident among physicians who prescribe opioids but, importantly, who had limited knowledge specifically regarding OMT. Gaps in knowledge and approach were observed. An educational intervention is highly recommended to reduce stigma and increase referrals of patients for OMT, the most effective treatment for opioid use disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":12922,"journal":{"name":"Harm Reduction Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"134"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503015/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stigma and level of familiarity with opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) among specialist physicians in Israel.\",\"authors\":\"Rozner Lihi, Delayahu Yael, Brill Silviu, Sason Anat, Weinstein Marsha, Shoshan Stacy, Schreiber Shaul, Adelson Miriam, Peles Einat\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12954-023-00869-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Opioid use disorder (OUD) poses significant public health problems that have increased dramatically, resulting in high rates of morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To minimize the risk of an opioid epidemic in Israel and be prepared, we evaluated physicians' objective knowledge, level of stigma, and approach to prescribing opioids, risk factors, and identification of patients with substance use disorder (SUD), as well as their knowledge about opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) for OUD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anonymous computerized questionnaires were distributed nationally to physicians by the Israel Medical Association. Knowledge, stigma, and approach were scored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of only 249 responders, 58.6% prescribe opioids, 32.1% prescribe cannabis, and 18.5% daily encounter patients with SUD. Logistic regression found the high knowledge group had daily encounters with SUD (Odds Ratio (OR) = 3.5, 95% CI 1.7-7.1) and were familiar with OMT (OR = 10.1, 95% CI 3.5-29.0). The high stigma group was characterized by physicians who prescribe opioids (OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.0-2.9), but who self-reported having limited knowledge regarding OMT (OR = 2, 95% CI 1.1-3.7). The high approach group was characterized by those who prescribe opioids (OR = 11.7, 95% CI 4.9-28), prescribe cannabis (OR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.0-4.3), self-report having limited knowledge regarding OMT (OR = 11.2, 95% CI 1.4-89) and self-report identifying SUD (OR = 32.5, 95% CI 4.1-260).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High stigma was most evident among physicians who prescribe opioids but, importantly, who had limited knowledge specifically regarding OMT. Gaps in knowledge and approach were observed. An educational intervention is highly recommended to reduce stigma and increase referrals of patients for OMT, the most effective treatment for opioid use disorder.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harm Reduction Journal\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503015/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harm Reduction Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-023-00869-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harm Reduction Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-023-00869-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)造成了严重的公共卫生问题,这些问题急剧增加,导致高发病率和死亡率。目的:为了最大限度地降低以色列阿片类药物流行的风险并做好准备,我们评估了医生的客观知识、耻辱程度、开阿片类药的方法、风险因素以及物质使用障碍(SUD)患者的识别,以及他们对OUD阿片类药物维持治疗(OMT)的了解。方法:以色列医学协会在全国范围内向医生分发匿名计算机问卷。对知识、污名和方法进行评分。结果:在仅有249名应答者中,58.6%的人开阿片类药物,32.1%的人开大麻,18.5%的人每天都会遇到SUD患者。Logistic回归发现,高知识组每天都会遇到SUD(OR) = 3.5,95%CI 1.7-7.1),熟悉OMT(OR = 10.1,95%CI 3.5-29.0)。高耻辱感组的特点是医生开阿片类药物(OR = 1.7,95%CI 1.0-2.9),但自我报告对OMT的了解有限(OR = 2,95%CI 1.1-3.7)。高入路组的特点是那些开阿片类药物的人(OR = 11.7,95%置信区间4.9-28),开具大麻处方(OR = 2.1,95%CI 1.0-4.3),自我报告对OMT的了解有限(OR = 11.2,95%CI 1.4-89)和自我报告识别SUD(OR = 32.5,95%CI 4.1-260)。结论:高耻辱感在开阿片类药物的医生中最为明显,但重要的是,他们对OMT的具体知识有限。观察到在知识和方法方面存在差距。强烈建议进行教育干预,以减少耻辱感,增加OMT患者的转诊,OMT是阿片类药物使用障碍的最有效治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Stigma and level of familiarity with opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) among specialist physicians in Israel.

Stigma and level of familiarity with opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) among specialist physicians in Israel.

Context: Opioid use disorder (OUD) poses significant public health problems that have increased dramatically, resulting in high rates of morbidity and mortality.

Objectives: To minimize the risk of an opioid epidemic in Israel and be prepared, we evaluated physicians' objective knowledge, level of stigma, and approach to prescribing opioids, risk factors, and identification of patients with substance use disorder (SUD), as well as their knowledge about opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) for OUD.

Methods: Anonymous computerized questionnaires were distributed nationally to physicians by the Israel Medical Association. Knowledge, stigma, and approach were scored.

Results: Of only 249 responders, 58.6% prescribe opioids, 32.1% prescribe cannabis, and 18.5% daily encounter patients with SUD. Logistic regression found the high knowledge group had daily encounters with SUD (Odds Ratio (OR) = 3.5, 95% CI 1.7-7.1) and were familiar with OMT (OR = 10.1, 95% CI 3.5-29.0). The high stigma group was characterized by physicians who prescribe opioids (OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.0-2.9), but who self-reported having limited knowledge regarding OMT (OR = 2, 95% CI 1.1-3.7). The high approach group was characterized by those who prescribe opioids (OR = 11.7, 95% CI 4.9-28), prescribe cannabis (OR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.0-4.3), self-report having limited knowledge regarding OMT (OR = 11.2, 95% CI 1.4-89) and self-report identifying SUD (OR = 32.5, 95% CI 4.1-260).

Conclusion: High stigma was most evident among physicians who prescribe opioids but, importantly, who had limited knowledge specifically regarding OMT. Gaps in knowledge and approach were observed. An educational intervention is highly recommended to reduce stigma and increase referrals of patients for OMT, the most effective treatment for opioid use disorder.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Harm Reduction Journal
Harm Reduction Journal Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Harm Reduction Journal is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal whose focus is on the prevalent patterns of psychoactive drug use, the public policies meant to control them, and the search for effective methods of reducing the adverse medical, public health, and social consequences associated with both drugs and drug policies. We define "harm reduction" as "policies and programs which aim to reduce the health, social, and economic costs of legal and illegal psychoactive drug use without necessarily reducing drug consumption". We are especially interested in studies of the evolving patterns of drug use around the world, their implications for the spread of HIV/AIDS and other blood-borne pathogens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信