COVID激增规划中的反向分类:急性医院环境中联合健康支持的临床护理途径的案例研究

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Toni Dianne Withiel, Rachel Blance-Palmer, Cassandra Plant, Genevieve Juj, Carly Louise McConnell, Melissa Kate Rixon, Mark Putland, Nicola Walsham, Marlena Klaic
{"title":"COVID激增规划中的反向分类:急性医院环境中联合健康支持的临床护理途径的案例研究","authors":"Toni Dianne Withiel,&nbsp;Rachel Blance-Palmer,&nbsp;Cassandra Plant,&nbsp;Genevieve Juj,&nbsp;Carly Louise McConnell,&nbsp;Melissa Kate Rixon,&nbsp;Mark Putland,&nbsp;Nicola Walsham,&nbsp;Marlena Klaic","doi":"10.1071/AH22084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective This case study describes the development and outcomes of a new integrated and multidisciplinary care pathway. Spearheaded by allied health, the 'COVID community navigator team', applied established principles of reverse triage to create additional surge capacity. Methods A retrospective cohort study examined workflow patterns using electronic medical records of patients who received navigator input at the Royal Melbourne Hospital between 20 September 2021 and 20 December 2021. Results There were 437 eligible patient encounters identified. On average patients stayed 4.15 h in the emergency departments (ED) (s.d. = 4.31) and 9.5 h (s.d. = 10.9) in the short stay unit. Most patients were discharged into a 'low risk pathway' with community general practitioner follow up. Of discharged patients, only 38 re-presented to the ED with symptoms related to their initial COVID-19 diagnosis (34.9% of total re-admissions). Of these re-admissions, more than half did not require admission to a ward. Conclusion The findings presented here provide support for the clinical utility of a multidisciplinary reverse triage approach in surge planning for anticipated presentation peaks.</p>","PeriodicalId":55425,"journal":{"name":"Australian Health Review","volume":"47 4","pages":"456-462"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reverse triage in COVID surge planning: a case study of an allied health supported clinical care pathway in an acute hospital setting.\",\"authors\":\"Toni Dianne Withiel,&nbsp;Rachel Blance-Palmer,&nbsp;Cassandra Plant,&nbsp;Genevieve Juj,&nbsp;Carly Louise McConnell,&nbsp;Melissa Kate Rixon,&nbsp;Mark Putland,&nbsp;Nicola Walsham,&nbsp;Marlena Klaic\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/AH22084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective This case study describes the development and outcomes of a new integrated and multidisciplinary care pathway. Spearheaded by allied health, the 'COVID community navigator team', applied established principles of reverse triage to create additional surge capacity. Methods A retrospective cohort study examined workflow patterns using electronic medical records of patients who received navigator input at the Royal Melbourne Hospital between 20 September 2021 and 20 December 2021. Results There were 437 eligible patient encounters identified. On average patients stayed 4.15 h in the emergency departments (ED) (s.d. = 4.31) and 9.5 h (s.d. = 10.9) in the short stay unit. Most patients were discharged into a 'low risk pathway' with community general practitioner follow up. Of discharged patients, only 38 re-presented to the ED with symptoms related to their initial COVID-19 diagnosis (34.9% of total re-admissions). Of these re-admissions, more than half did not require admission to a ward. Conclusion The findings presented here provide support for the clinical utility of a multidisciplinary reverse triage approach in surge planning for anticipated presentation peaks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Health Review\",\"volume\":\"47 4\",\"pages\":\"456-462\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Health Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH22084\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Health Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH22084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本案例研究描述了一种新的综合多学科护理途径的发展和结果。在联合卫生机构的带头下,“COVID社区导航员小组”应用了既定的反向分类原则,以建立额外的应急能力。方法回顾性队列研究使用2021年9月20日至2021年12月20日期间在皇家墨尔本医院接受导航输入的患者的电子病历检查工作流程模式。结果共纳入437例符合条件的患者。患者在急诊科(ED)的平均住院时间为4.15小时(sd = 4.31),在短期住院单元的平均住院时间为9.5小时(sd = 10.9)。大多数患者出院进入“低风险途径”,由社区全科医生随访。在出院患者中,只有38人再次出现与最初的COVID-19诊断相关的症状(占再次入院总人数的34.9%)。在这些再次入院的病人中,一半以上不需要入院。结论:本文的研究结果为多学科反向分诊方法在预期就诊高峰的激增计划中的临床应用提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reverse triage in COVID surge planning: a case study of an allied health supported clinical care pathway in an acute hospital setting.

Objective This case study describes the development and outcomes of a new integrated and multidisciplinary care pathway. Spearheaded by allied health, the 'COVID community navigator team', applied established principles of reverse triage to create additional surge capacity. Methods A retrospective cohort study examined workflow patterns using electronic medical records of patients who received navigator input at the Royal Melbourne Hospital between 20 September 2021 and 20 December 2021. Results There were 437 eligible patient encounters identified. On average patients stayed 4.15 h in the emergency departments (ED) (s.d. = 4.31) and 9.5 h (s.d. = 10.9) in the short stay unit. Most patients were discharged into a 'low risk pathway' with community general practitioner follow up. Of discharged patients, only 38 re-presented to the ED with symptoms related to their initial COVID-19 diagnosis (34.9% of total re-admissions). Of these re-admissions, more than half did not require admission to a ward. Conclusion The findings presented here provide support for the clinical utility of a multidisciplinary reverse triage approach in surge planning for anticipated presentation peaks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Health Review
Australian Health Review 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Health Review is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes contributions on all aspects of health policy, management and governance; healthcare delivery systems; workforce; health financing; and other matters of interest to those working in health care. In addition to analyses and commentary, the journal publishes original research from practitioners – managers and clinicians – and reports of breakthrough projects that demonstrate better ways of delivering care. Australian Health Review explores major national and international health issues and questions, enabling health professionals to keep their fingers on the pulse of the nation’s health decisions and to know what the most influential commentators and decision makers are thinking. Australian Health Review is a valuable resource for managers, policy makers and clinical staff in health organisations, including government departments, hospitals, community centres and aged-care facilities, as well as anyone with an interest in the health industry. Australian Health Review is published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of the Australian Healthcare and Hospitals Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信