2019冠状病毒病大流行早期医护人员与公众焦虑水平的比较

Guanguan Luo, Yumin Liu, Dongai Yao, Shaozhou Ni, Bangsheng Wu, Liting Lin, Yunming Wang
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病大流行早期医护人员与公众焦虑水平的比较","authors":"Guanguan Luo,&nbsp;Yumin Liu,&nbsp;Dongai Yao,&nbsp;Shaozhou Ni,&nbsp;Bangsheng Wu,&nbsp;Liting Lin,&nbsp;Yunming Wang","doi":"10.1097/EC9.0000000000000038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A sudden outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) started in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. Up-to-date, there have been limited studies examining the anxiety status of Chinese individuals in the early phase of the pandemic period (January 30, 2020-February 15, 2020). This survey aimed to compare the level of anxiety of the medical staff with that of the public and to provide a theoretical basis for developing an effective psychological intervention.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Questionnaires were sent on the Internet (http://www.wjx.cn) during this period. The anxiety levels of Chinese people were investigated using the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and the demographic data were collected simultaneously.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1110 participants were enrolled in this study, with an effective response rate of 100%. A total of 482 respondents were medical staff (43.4%), while 628 were members of the general public (56.6%). The medical staff itself had a higher SAS score than the general public (48.36±13.40 <i>vs</i>. 45.74±11.79, <i>P</i> < 0.01), while the medical staff in Wuhan were more anxious than the public in Wuhan with a higher SAS score (54.17±14.08 <i>vs</i>. 48.53±11.92, <i>P</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the anxiety levels of the medical staff and the public, with the medical personnel showing a higher anxiety level than the public, especially female medical staff in Wuhan. Therefore, urgent intervention programs to reduce anxiety should be implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":72895,"journal":{"name":"Emergency and critical care medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/98/01/eccm-2-116.PMC9555553.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the anxiety level between the medical staff and the public during the early phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Guanguan Luo,&nbsp;Yumin Liu,&nbsp;Dongai Yao,&nbsp;Shaozhou Ni,&nbsp;Bangsheng Wu,&nbsp;Liting Lin,&nbsp;Yunming Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EC9.0000000000000038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A sudden outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) started in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. Up-to-date, there have been limited studies examining the anxiety status of Chinese individuals in the early phase of the pandemic period (January 30, 2020-February 15, 2020). This survey aimed to compare the level of anxiety of the medical staff with that of the public and to provide a theoretical basis for developing an effective psychological intervention.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Questionnaires were sent on the Internet (http://www.wjx.cn) during this period. The anxiety levels of Chinese people were investigated using the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and the demographic data were collected simultaneously.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1110 participants were enrolled in this study, with an effective response rate of 100%. A total of 482 respondents were medical staff (43.4%), while 628 were members of the general public (56.6%). The medical staff itself had a higher SAS score than the general public (48.36±13.40 <i>vs</i>. 45.74±11.79, <i>P</i> < 0.01), while the medical staff in Wuhan were more anxious than the public in Wuhan with a higher SAS score (54.17±14.08 <i>vs</i>. 48.53±11.92, <i>P</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the anxiety levels of the medical staff and the public, with the medical personnel showing a higher anxiety level than the public, especially female medical staff in Wuhan. Therefore, urgent intervention programs to reduce anxiety should be implemented.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency and critical care medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/98/01/eccm-2-116.PMC9555553.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency and critical care medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EC9.0000000000000038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EC9.0000000000000038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2019年12月,新型冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)在中国武汉突然爆发。迄今为止,关于大流行初期(2020年1月30日至2020年2月15日)中国个体焦虑状况的研究有限。本调查旨在比较医务人员与公众的焦虑水平,为制定有效的心理干预措施提供理论依据。方法:在此期间通过互联网(http://www.wjx.cn)进行问卷调查。采用焦虑自评量表(SAS)对中国人的焦虑水平进行调查,同时收集人口学数据。结果:本研究共纳入受试者1110人,有效有效率为100%。共有482名受访者为医务人员(43.4%),而628名受访者为普通市民(56.6%)。医务人员自身的SAS得分高于普通民众(48.36±13.40比45.74±11.79,P < 0.01),武汉市医务人员的SAS得分高于普通民众(54.17±14.08比48.53±11.92,P < 0.01)。结论:新冠肺炎大流行对医务人员和公众的焦虑水平产生了显著影响,武汉市医务人员的焦虑水平高于公众,尤其是女性医务人员。因此,应实施紧急干预方案以减少焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the anxiety level between the medical staff and the public during the early phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Background: A sudden outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) started in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. Up-to-date, there have been limited studies examining the anxiety status of Chinese individuals in the early phase of the pandemic period (January 30, 2020-February 15, 2020). This survey aimed to compare the level of anxiety of the medical staff with that of the public and to provide a theoretical basis for developing an effective psychological intervention.

Method: Questionnaires were sent on the Internet (http://www.wjx.cn) during this period. The anxiety levels of Chinese people were investigated using the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and the demographic data were collected simultaneously.

Results: A total of 1110 participants were enrolled in this study, with an effective response rate of 100%. A total of 482 respondents were medical staff (43.4%), while 628 were members of the general public (56.6%). The medical staff itself had a higher SAS score than the general public (48.36±13.40 vs. 45.74±11.79, P < 0.01), while the medical staff in Wuhan were more anxious than the public in Wuhan with a higher SAS score (54.17±14.08 vs. 48.53±11.92, P < 0.01).

Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the anxiety levels of the medical staff and the public, with the medical personnel showing a higher anxiety level than the public, especially female medical staff in Wuhan. Therefore, urgent intervention programs to reduce anxiety should be implemented.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信