由于自身受精而进行的吹扫并不能防止膨胀载荷的积累。

IF 4.5 2区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Leo Zeitler, Christian Parisod, Kimberly J Gilbert
{"title":"由于自身受精而进行的吹扫并不能防止膨胀载荷的积累。","authors":"Leo Zeitler,&nbsp;Christian Parisod,&nbsp;Kimberly J Gilbert","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgen.1010883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As species expand their geographic ranges, colonizing populations face novel ecological conditions, such as new environments and limited mates, and suffer from evolutionary consequences of demographic change through bottlenecks and mutation load accumulation. Self-fertilization is often observed at species range edges and, in addition to countering the lack of mates, is hypothesized as an evolutionary advantage against load accumulation through increased homozygosity and purging. We study how selfing impacts the accumulation of genetic load during range expansion via purging and/or speed of colonization. Using simulations, we disentangle inbreeding effects due to demography versus due to selfing and find that selfers expand faster, but still accumulate load, regardless of mating system. The severity of variants contributing to this load, however, differs across mating system: higher selfing rates purge large-effect recessive variants leaving a burden of smaller-effect alleles. We compare these predictions to the mixed-mating plant Arabis alpina, using whole-genome sequences from refugial outcrossing populations versus expanded selfing populations. Empirical results indicate accumulation of expansion load along with evidence of purging in selfing populations, concordant with our simulations, suggesting that while purging is a benefit of selfing evolving during range expansions, it is not sufficient to prevent load accumulation due to range expansion.</p>","PeriodicalId":20266,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Genetics","volume":"19 9","pages":"e1010883"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501686/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Purging due to self-fertilization does not prevent accumulation of expansion load.\",\"authors\":\"Leo Zeitler,&nbsp;Christian Parisod,&nbsp;Kimberly J Gilbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pgen.1010883\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As species expand their geographic ranges, colonizing populations face novel ecological conditions, such as new environments and limited mates, and suffer from evolutionary consequences of demographic change through bottlenecks and mutation load accumulation. Self-fertilization is often observed at species range edges and, in addition to countering the lack of mates, is hypothesized as an evolutionary advantage against load accumulation through increased homozygosity and purging. We study how selfing impacts the accumulation of genetic load during range expansion via purging and/or speed of colonization. Using simulations, we disentangle inbreeding effects due to demography versus due to selfing and find that selfers expand faster, but still accumulate load, regardless of mating system. The severity of variants contributing to this load, however, differs across mating system: higher selfing rates purge large-effect recessive variants leaving a burden of smaller-effect alleles. We compare these predictions to the mixed-mating plant Arabis alpina, using whole-genome sequences from refugial outcrossing populations versus expanded selfing populations. Empirical results indicate accumulation of expansion load along with evidence of purging in selfing populations, concordant with our simulations, suggesting that while purging is a benefit of selfing evolving during range expansions, it is not sufficient to prevent load accumulation due to range expansion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS Genetics\",\"volume\":\"19 9\",\"pages\":\"e1010883\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501686/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1010883\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1010883","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着物种地理范围的扩大,定居种群面临着新的生态条件,如新的环境和有限的配偶,并通过瓶颈和突变负荷积累而遭受人口变化的进化后果。自受精通常在物种范围的边缘观察到,除了对抗配偶的缺乏外,还被假设为通过增加纯合性和清除来对抗负荷积累的进化优势。我们研究了自拍如何通过清除和/或定植速度影响范围扩大过程中遗传负荷的积累。通过模拟,我们将由人口统计学引起的近亲繁殖效应与由自交引起的近亲繁殖效应区分开来,并发现无论交配系统如何,自交后代的繁殖速度更快,但仍会积累负荷。然而,造成这种负荷的变异的严重程度在不同的交配系统中有所不同:较高的自交率清除了大效应隐性变异,留下了较小效应等位基因的负担。我们将这些预测与混合交配植物高山阿拉比斯进行了比较,使用了来自避难所异交群体和扩大的自交群体的全基因组序列。经验结果表明,膨胀载荷的积累以及自食种群中清除的证据与我们的模拟一致,表明虽然清除是自食在射程扩张过程中进化的好处,但不足以防止因射程扩张而导致的载荷积累。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Purging due to self-fertilization does not prevent accumulation of expansion load.

Purging due to self-fertilization does not prevent accumulation of expansion load.

Purging due to self-fertilization does not prevent accumulation of expansion load.

Purging due to self-fertilization does not prevent accumulation of expansion load.

As species expand their geographic ranges, colonizing populations face novel ecological conditions, such as new environments and limited mates, and suffer from evolutionary consequences of demographic change through bottlenecks and mutation load accumulation. Self-fertilization is often observed at species range edges and, in addition to countering the lack of mates, is hypothesized as an evolutionary advantage against load accumulation through increased homozygosity and purging. We study how selfing impacts the accumulation of genetic load during range expansion via purging and/or speed of colonization. Using simulations, we disentangle inbreeding effects due to demography versus due to selfing and find that selfers expand faster, but still accumulate load, regardless of mating system. The severity of variants contributing to this load, however, differs across mating system: higher selfing rates purge large-effect recessive variants leaving a burden of smaller-effect alleles. We compare these predictions to the mixed-mating plant Arabis alpina, using whole-genome sequences from refugial outcrossing populations versus expanded selfing populations. Empirical results indicate accumulation of expansion load along with evidence of purging in selfing populations, concordant with our simulations, suggesting that while purging is a benefit of selfing evolving during range expansions, it is not sufficient to prevent load accumulation due to range expansion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS Genetics
PLoS Genetics 生物-遗传学
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
2.20%
发文量
438
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: PLOS Genetics is run by an international Editorial Board, headed by the Editors-in-Chief, Greg Barsh (HudsonAlpha Institute of Biotechnology, and Stanford University School of Medicine) and Greg Copenhaver (The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). Articles published in PLOS Genetics are archived in PubMed Central and cited in PubMed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信