[脓毒症-3.0-重症监护医学为ICD-11做好准备了吗?]]

4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Thomas Schmoch, Michael Bernhard, Andrea Becker-Pennrich, Ludwig Christian Hinske, Josef Briegel, Patrick Möhnle, Thorsten Brenner, Markus A Weigand
{"title":"[脓毒症-3.0-重症监护医学为ICD-11做好准备了吗?]]","authors":"Thomas Schmoch,&nbsp;Michael Bernhard,&nbsp;Andrea Becker-Pennrich,&nbsp;Ludwig Christian Hinske,&nbsp;Josef Briegel,&nbsp;Patrick Möhnle,&nbsp;Thorsten Brenner,&nbsp;Markus A Weigand","doi":"10.1007/s00101-021-01012-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) will come into effect in January 2022. Among other things, The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (SEPSIS‑3 definition) will be implemented in it. This defines sepsis as a \"life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection\". The aim of the present secondary analysis of a survey on the topic of \"sepsis-induced coagulopathy\" was to evaluate whether the SEPSIS‑3 definition, 4 years after its international introduction, has arrived in everyday clinical practice of intensive care units (ICU) run by anesthesiologists in Germany and thus the requirements for its use of the ICD-11 are given.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between October 2019 and May 2020, we carried out a nationwide survey among German medical directors of ICUs. In a separate block of questions we asked about the definition of sepsis used in daily practice. In addition, we asked whether the quick-sequential (sepsis-related) organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score is used in screening for sepsis in the hospital to which to the participating ICU belongs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 50 medical directors from anesthesiological ICUs took part in the survey. In total, the ICUs evaluated stated that they had around 14% of the high-care beds registered in Germany. The SEPSIS‑3 definition is integrated into everyday clinical practice at 78.9% of the university hospitals and 84.0% of the participating teaching hospitals. In contrast, the qSOFA screening test is only used by 26.3% of the participating university hospitals, but at least 52% of the teaching hospitals and 80% of the other hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The data show that both SEPSIS‑3 and qSOFA have become part of everyday clinical practice in German hospitals. The cautious use of qSOFA at university hospitals with simultaneous broad acceptance of the SEPSIS‑3 definition can be interpreted as an indication that the search for a suitable screening test for sepsis has not yet been completed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50796,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesist","volume":"71 2","pages":"104-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00101-021-01012-8","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[SEPSIS-3.0-Is intensive care medicine ready for ICD-11?]\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Schmoch,&nbsp;Michael Bernhard,&nbsp;Andrea Becker-Pennrich,&nbsp;Ludwig Christian Hinske,&nbsp;Josef Briegel,&nbsp;Patrick Möhnle,&nbsp;Thorsten Brenner,&nbsp;Markus A Weigand\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00101-021-01012-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) will come into effect in January 2022. Among other things, The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (SEPSIS‑3 definition) will be implemented in it. This defines sepsis as a \\\"life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection\\\". The aim of the present secondary analysis of a survey on the topic of \\\"sepsis-induced coagulopathy\\\" was to evaluate whether the SEPSIS‑3 definition, 4 years after its international introduction, has arrived in everyday clinical practice of intensive care units (ICU) run by anesthesiologists in Germany and thus the requirements for its use of the ICD-11 are given.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between October 2019 and May 2020, we carried out a nationwide survey among German medical directors of ICUs. In a separate block of questions we asked about the definition of sepsis used in daily practice. In addition, we asked whether the quick-sequential (sepsis-related) organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score is used in screening for sepsis in the hospital to which to the participating ICU belongs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 50 medical directors from anesthesiological ICUs took part in the survey. In total, the ICUs evaluated stated that they had around 14% of the high-care beds registered in Germany. The SEPSIS‑3 definition is integrated into everyday clinical practice at 78.9% of the university hospitals and 84.0% of the participating teaching hospitals. In contrast, the qSOFA screening test is only used by 26.3% of the participating university hospitals, but at least 52% of the teaching hospitals and 80% of the other hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The data show that both SEPSIS‑3 and qSOFA have become part of everyday clinical practice in German hospitals. The cautious use of qSOFA at university hospitals with simultaneous broad acceptance of the SEPSIS‑3 definition can be interpreted as an indication that the search for a suitable screening test for sepsis has not yet been completed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesist\",\"volume\":\"71 2\",\"pages\":\"104-109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00101-021-01012-8\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-021-01012-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-021-01012-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:第11版《国际疾病分类》(ICD-11)将于2022年1月生效。除其他事项外,第三次国际共识定义败血症和感染性休克(败血症- 3定义)将在其中实施。这将败血症定义为“由宿主对感染反应失调引起的危及生命的器官功能障碍”。本研究对一项关于“脓毒症诱导凝血功能障碍”的调查进行了二次分析,目的是评估在国际上引入脓毒症- 3定义4年后,脓毒症- 3定义是否已进入德国麻醉医师管理的重症监护病房(ICU)的日常临床实践,并给出其使用ICD-11的要求。方法:在2019年10月至2020年5月期间,对德国icu医学主任进行全国性调查。在一个单独的问题块我们问脓毒症的定义在日常实践中使用。此外,我们询问参与ICU所属医院是否使用快速序列(败血症相关)器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分来筛查败血症。结果:共有50名麻醉icu内科主任参与了调查。总体而言,经过评估的icu表示,他们拥有约14%的德国注册的高级护理床位。78.9%的大学医院和84.0%的参与研究的教学医院将败血症- 3定义纳入了日常临床实践。相比之下,qSOFA筛查试验仅被26.3%的参与大学医院使用,但至少有52%的教学医院和80%的其他医院使用。结论:数据显示败血症- 3和qSOFA已成为德国医院日常临床实践的一部分。在广泛接受脓毒症- 3定义的同时,在大学医院谨慎使用qSOFA可被解释为对合适的脓毒症筛查试验的寻找尚未完成的迹象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

[SEPSIS-3.0-Is intensive care medicine ready for ICD-11?]

[SEPSIS-3.0-Is intensive care medicine ready for ICD-11?]

[SEPSIS-3.0-Is intensive care medicine ready for ICD-11?]

[SEPSIS-3.0-Is intensive care medicine ready for ICD-11?]

Background: The 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) will come into effect in January 2022. Among other things, The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (SEPSIS‑3 definition) will be implemented in it. This defines sepsis as a "life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection". The aim of the present secondary analysis of a survey on the topic of "sepsis-induced coagulopathy" was to evaluate whether the SEPSIS‑3 definition, 4 years after its international introduction, has arrived in everyday clinical practice of intensive care units (ICU) run by anesthesiologists in Germany and thus the requirements for its use of the ICD-11 are given.

Methods: Between October 2019 and May 2020, we carried out a nationwide survey among German medical directors of ICUs. In a separate block of questions we asked about the definition of sepsis used in daily practice. In addition, we asked whether the quick-sequential (sepsis-related) organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score is used in screening for sepsis in the hospital to which to the participating ICU belongs.

Results: A total of 50 medical directors from anesthesiological ICUs took part in the survey. In total, the ICUs evaluated stated that they had around 14% of the high-care beds registered in Germany. The SEPSIS‑3 definition is integrated into everyday clinical practice at 78.9% of the university hospitals and 84.0% of the participating teaching hospitals. In contrast, the qSOFA screening test is only used by 26.3% of the participating university hospitals, but at least 52% of the teaching hospitals and 80% of the other hospitals.

Conclusion: The data show that both SEPSIS‑3 and qSOFA have become part of everyday clinical practice in German hospitals. The cautious use of qSOFA at university hospitals with simultaneous broad acceptance of the SEPSIS‑3 definition can be interpreted as an indication that the search for a suitable screening test for sepsis has not yet been completed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anaesthesist
Anaesthesist 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Anaesthesist is an internationally recognized journal de­aling with all aspects of anaesthesia and intensive medicine up to pain therapy. Der Anaesthesist addresses all specialists and scientists particularly interested in anaesthesiology and it is neighbouring areas. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics reflecting the multidisciplinary environment including pharmacotherapy, intensive medicine, emergency medicine, regional anaesthetics, pain therapy and medical law. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of relevant clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信