失效模式、影响及严重性分析在某高校医院温敏药物使用过程中的应用

IF 0.6 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Hana Sakly, Ines Chakroun, Khouloud Ben Jeddou
{"title":"失效模式、影响及严重性分析在某高校医院温敏药物使用过程中的应用","authors":"Hana Sakly,&nbsp;Ines Chakroun,&nbsp;Khouloud Ben Jeddou","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the hospital setting, the medication-use system for temperature-sensitive drugs is a high-risk process.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze the risks associated with the hospital-based medication-use process and to propose corrective and preventive actions for the most critical failure modes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary team was trained to analyze the medication-use process for temperature-sensitive drugs and to identify potential failures using a risk analysis method known as failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA). The medication-use process, from initial supply to administration to patients, was investigated using \"the 5 Ws and How\" method (Who? What? Where? When? Why? How?), and the causes of the failure modes were analyzed using Ishikawa diagrams. The most critical failure modes were selected using the Pareto law, and relevant improvement actions were proposed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This analysis identified 41 failure modes for the 9 stages of the medication-use process, of which only 36 were deemed assessable by the participants. Eighteen (50%) of these failure modes were critical, according to the Pareto law, with criticality indices between 12 and 60. The stage of tidying up and storage in patient care units had the highest number of critical failures (<i>n</i> = 5). A total of 48 corrective actions were proposed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed action plan prioritized 3 areas for improvement: the documentation system, staff training, and equipment acquisition. A second FMECA should be carried out to reassess the medication-use process after implementation of these improvement actions. The second FMECA, allowing detection of residual risks and identification of new risks, will be part of a continuous improvement process.</p>","PeriodicalId":51646,"journal":{"name":"CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY","volume":"75 3","pages":"159-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245412/pdf/cjhp-75-159.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis to the Medication-Use Process for Temperature-Sensitive Drugs in a University Hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Hana Sakly,&nbsp;Ines Chakroun,&nbsp;Khouloud Ben Jeddou\",\"doi\":\"10.4212/cjhp.3121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the hospital setting, the medication-use system for temperature-sensitive drugs is a high-risk process.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze the risks associated with the hospital-based medication-use process and to propose corrective and preventive actions for the most critical failure modes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary team was trained to analyze the medication-use process for temperature-sensitive drugs and to identify potential failures using a risk analysis method known as failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA). The medication-use process, from initial supply to administration to patients, was investigated using \\\"the 5 Ws and How\\\" method (Who? What? Where? When? Why? How?), and the causes of the failure modes were analyzed using Ishikawa diagrams. The most critical failure modes were selected using the Pareto law, and relevant improvement actions were proposed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This analysis identified 41 failure modes for the 9 stages of the medication-use process, of which only 36 were deemed assessable by the participants. Eighteen (50%) of these failure modes were critical, according to the Pareto law, with criticality indices between 12 and 60. The stage of tidying up and storage in patient care units had the highest number of critical failures (<i>n</i> = 5). A total of 48 corrective actions were proposed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed action plan prioritized 3 areas for improvement: the documentation system, staff training, and equipment acquisition. A second FMECA should be carried out to reassess the medication-use process after implementation of these improvement actions. The second FMECA, allowing detection of residual risks and identification of new risks, will be part of a continuous improvement process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY\",\"volume\":\"75 3\",\"pages\":\"159-168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245412/pdf/cjhp-75-159.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:在医院环境中,温度敏感药物的用药系统是一个高风险的过程。目的:分析医院用药过程的相关风险,并针对最关键的失效模式提出纠正和预防措施。方法:对多学科团队进行培训,分析温度敏感型药物的用药过程,并使用失效模式、影响和临界性分析(FMECA)风险分析方法识别潜在的失效。药物使用过程,从最初的供应到给病人给药,使用“5w和如何”方法(谁?怎么啦?在哪里?什么时候?为什么?如何?),并利用石川图分析了失效模式的原因。利用Pareto法则选择了最关键的失效模式,并提出了相应的改进措施。结果:本分析确定了用药过程9个阶段的41种失效模式,其中只有36种被参与者认为是可评估的。根据帕累托定律,这些失效模式中有18种(50%)是临界的,临界指数在12到60之间。病人护理单位的整理和储存阶段有最高数量的严重故障(n = 5)。总共提出了48项纠正措施。结论:提出的行动计划优先考虑了三个方面的改进:文件系统、员工培训和设备采购。在实施这些改进措施后,应进行第二次FMECA,以重新评估用药过程。第二个FMECA,允许检测剩余风险和识别新风险,将成为持续改进过程的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Application of Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis to the Medication-Use Process for Temperature-Sensitive Drugs in a University Hospital.

Application of Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis to the Medication-Use Process for Temperature-Sensitive Drugs in a University Hospital.

Background: In the hospital setting, the medication-use system for temperature-sensitive drugs is a high-risk process.

Objectives: To analyze the risks associated with the hospital-based medication-use process and to propose corrective and preventive actions for the most critical failure modes.

Methods: A multidisciplinary team was trained to analyze the medication-use process for temperature-sensitive drugs and to identify potential failures using a risk analysis method known as failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA). The medication-use process, from initial supply to administration to patients, was investigated using "the 5 Ws and How" method (Who? What? Where? When? Why? How?), and the causes of the failure modes were analyzed using Ishikawa diagrams. The most critical failure modes were selected using the Pareto law, and relevant improvement actions were proposed.

Results: This analysis identified 41 failure modes for the 9 stages of the medication-use process, of which only 36 were deemed assessable by the participants. Eighteen (50%) of these failure modes were critical, according to the Pareto law, with criticality indices between 12 and 60. The stage of tidying up and storage in patient care units had the highest number of critical failures (n = 5). A total of 48 corrective actions were proposed.

Conclusion: The proposed action plan prioritized 3 areas for improvement: the documentation system, staff training, and equipment acquisition. A second FMECA should be carried out to reassess the medication-use process after implementation of these improvement actions. The second FMECA, allowing detection of residual risks and identification of new risks, will be part of a continuous improvement process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The CJHP is an academic journal that focuses on how pharmacists in hospitals and other collaborative health care settings optimize safe and effective drug use for patients in Canada and throughout the world. The aim of the CJHP is to be a respected international publication serving as a major venue for dissemination of information related to patient-centred pharmacy practice in hospitals and other collaborative health care settings in Canada and throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信