生物医学设备工程课程中的体验式学习:提案开发和基于原始研究数据的作业。

Noah Goshi, Gregory Girardi, Hyehyun Kim, Erkin Seker
{"title":"生物医学设备工程课程中的体验式学习:提案开发和基于原始研究数据的作业。","authors":"Noah Goshi, Gregory Girardi, Hyehyun Kim, Erkin Seker","doi":"10.1007/s43683-022-00094-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a need for novel teaching approaches to train biomedical engineers that are conversant across disciplines and have the technical skills to address interdisciplinary scientific and technological challenges. Here, we describe a graduate-level miniaturized biomedical device engineering course that has been taught over the last decade in in-person, remote, and hybrid formats. The course employs experiential learning components, including a proposal development and review that mimic the National Institutes of Health process and technical assignments that use raw research data to simulate a research experience. The effectiveness of the course was measured via pre-/post-course concept inventory surveys as well as course evaluations with targeted questions on the learning instruments. Statistical comparison of pre-/post-course survey scores suggests that the course was effective in students achieving the learning objectives, and comparison of relative increase in pre-/post-course survey scores across different instruction formats (i.e., in-person, remote, hybrid) showed minimal difference, suggesting that the teaching elements are readily transferrable to remote instruction.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43683-022-00094-z.</p>","PeriodicalId":72385,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical engineering education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9734624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiential Learning in a Biomedical Device Engineering Course: Proposal Development and Raw Research Data-Based Assignments.\",\"authors\":\"Noah Goshi, Gregory Girardi, Hyehyun Kim, Erkin Seker\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43683-022-00094-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is a need for novel teaching approaches to train biomedical engineers that are conversant across disciplines and have the technical skills to address interdisciplinary scientific and technological challenges. Here, we describe a graduate-level miniaturized biomedical device engineering course that has been taught over the last decade in in-person, remote, and hybrid formats. The course employs experiential learning components, including a proposal development and review that mimic the National Institutes of Health process and technical assignments that use raw research data to simulate a research experience. The effectiveness of the course was measured via pre-/post-course concept inventory surveys as well as course evaluations with targeted questions on the learning instruments. Statistical comparison of pre-/post-course survey scores suggests that the course was effective in students achieving the learning objectives, and comparison of relative increase in pre-/post-course survey scores across different instruction formats (i.e., in-person, remote, hybrid) showed minimal difference, suggesting that the teaching elements are readily transferrable to remote instruction.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43683-022-00094-z.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical engineering education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9734624/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical engineering education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-022-00094-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical engineering education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-022-00094-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们需要新颖的教学方法来培养跨学科的生物医学工程师,使他们具备应对跨学科科学和技术挑战的技术技能。在此,我们介绍了一门研究生水平的微型生物医学设备工程课程,该课程在过去十年中以面授、远程和混合形式进行了讲授。该课程采用了体验式学习内容,包括模仿美国国立卫生研究院流程的提案开发和审查,以及使用原始研究数据模拟研究体验的技术作业。课程的有效性通过课前/课后概念清单调查以及针对学习工具问题的课程评估来衡量。课程前后调查得分的统计比较表明,该课程能有效地帮助学生实现学习目标,不同教学形式(即面授、远程、混合式教学)的课程前后调查得分的相对增幅比较显示差异极小,这表明教学元素很容易移植到远程教学中:在线版本包含补充材料,可在 10.1007/s43683-022-00094-z.上查阅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Experiential Learning in a Biomedical Device Engineering Course: Proposal Development and Raw Research Data-Based Assignments.

Experiential Learning in a Biomedical Device Engineering Course: Proposal Development and Raw Research Data-Based Assignments.

There is a need for novel teaching approaches to train biomedical engineers that are conversant across disciplines and have the technical skills to address interdisciplinary scientific and technological challenges. Here, we describe a graduate-level miniaturized biomedical device engineering course that has been taught over the last decade in in-person, remote, and hybrid formats. The course employs experiential learning components, including a proposal development and review that mimic the National Institutes of Health process and technical assignments that use raw research data to simulate a research experience. The effectiveness of the course was measured via pre-/post-course concept inventory surveys as well as course evaluations with targeted questions on the learning instruments. Statistical comparison of pre-/post-course survey scores suggests that the course was effective in students achieving the learning objectives, and comparison of relative increase in pre-/post-course survey scores across different instruction formats (i.e., in-person, remote, hybrid) showed minimal difference, suggesting that the teaching elements are readily transferrable to remote instruction.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43683-022-00094-z.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信