药品中萃取物和浸出物的致敏评估:ELSIE 数据库分析。

Q3 Medicine
Patricia Parris, Geraldine Whelan, Anders Burild, Jessica Whritenour, Uma Bruen, Joel Bercu, Courtney Callis, Martyn L Chilton, Jessica Graham, Esther Johann, Candice Johnson, Troy Griffin, Martin Kohan, Elizabeth A Martin, Melisa Masuda-Herrera, Brad Stanard, Maureen T Cruz, Lee Nagao
{"title":"药品中萃取物和浸出物的致敏评估:ELSIE 数据库分析。","authors":"Patricia Parris, Geraldine Whelan, Anders Burild, Jessica Whritenour, Uma Bruen, Joel Bercu, Courtney Callis, Martyn L Chilton, Jessica Graham, Esther Johann, Candice Johnson, Troy Griffin, Martin Kohan, Elizabeth A Martin, Melisa Masuda-Herrera, Brad Stanard, Maureen T Cruz, Lee Nagao","doi":"10.5731/pdajpst.2022.012811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quality by design is the foundation of the risk management framework for extractables and leachables (E&Ls) recommended by the Extractables and Leachables Safety Information Exchange (ELSIE). Following these principles during the selection of materials for pharmaceutical product development minimizes the presence of highly toxic substances and decreases the health risk of potential leachables in the drug product. Therefore, in the context of the broad arena of chemicals, it is important to distinguish E&Ls as a subset of chemicals and evaluate this relevant chemical space to derive appropriate analytical and safety thresholds. When considering the health hazards posed by E&Ls, one area presenting a challenge is understanding the sensitization potential and whether it poses a risk to patients. A dataset of E&Ls compiled by ELSIE (n = 466) was analyzed to determine the prevalence and potency of skin sensitizers in this chemical subset and explore a scientifically justified approach to the sensitization assessment of potential leachables in parenteral drug products. Approximately half of the compounds (56%, 259/466) had sensitization data recorded in the ELSIE database and of these, 20% (52/259) are potential skin sensitizers. Only 3% (8/259) of the E&L dataset with sensitization data were considered potent (strong or extreme) sensitizers following in silico analysis and expert review, illustrating that potent sensitizers are not routinely observed as leachables in pharmaceutical products. Our analysis highlights that in silico potency prediction and expert review are key tools during the sensitization assessment process for E&Ls. The results confirm where material selection is anticipated to mitigate the risk of presence of strong and/or extreme sensitizers (e.g., extractable testing via ISO 10993-10), and that implementing thresholds per ICH M7 and/or Masuda-Herrera et al. provides a reasonably conservative approach for establishing the analytical testing and safety thresholds.</p>","PeriodicalId":19986,"journal":{"name":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensitization Assessment of Extractables and Leachables in Pharmaceuticals: ELSIE Database Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Patricia Parris, Geraldine Whelan, Anders Burild, Jessica Whritenour, Uma Bruen, Joel Bercu, Courtney Callis, Martyn L Chilton, Jessica Graham, Esther Johann, Candice Johnson, Troy Griffin, Martin Kohan, Elizabeth A Martin, Melisa Masuda-Herrera, Brad Stanard, Maureen T Cruz, Lee Nagao\",\"doi\":\"10.5731/pdajpst.2022.012811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Quality by design is the foundation of the risk management framework for extractables and leachables (E&Ls) recommended by the Extractables and Leachables Safety Information Exchange (ELSIE). Following these principles during the selection of materials for pharmaceutical product development minimizes the presence of highly toxic substances and decreases the health risk of potential leachables in the drug product. Therefore, in the context of the broad arena of chemicals, it is important to distinguish E&Ls as a subset of chemicals and evaluate this relevant chemical space to derive appropriate analytical and safety thresholds. When considering the health hazards posed by E&Ls, one area presenting a challenge is understanding the sensitization potential and whether it poses a risk to patients. A dataset of E&Ls compiled by ELSIE (n = 466) was analyzed to determine the prevalence and potency of skin sensitizers in this chemical subset and explore a scientifically justified approach to the sensitization assessment of potential leachables in parenteral drug products. Approximately half of the compounds (56%, 259/466) had sensitization data recorded in the ELSIE database and of these, 20% (52/259) are potential skin sensitizers. Only 3% (8/259) of the E&L dataset with sensitization data were considered potent (strong or extreme) sensitizers following in silico analysis and expert review, illustrating that potent sensitizers are not routinely observed as leachables in pharmaceutical products. Our analysis highlights that in silico potency prediction and expert review are key tools during the sensitization assessment process for E&Ls. The results confirm where material selection is anticipated to mitigate the risk of presence of strong and/or extreme sensitizers (e.g., extractable testing via ISO 10993-10), and that implementing thresholds per ICH M7 and/or Masuda-Herrera et al. provides a reasonably conservative approach for establishing the analytical testing and safety thresholds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2022.012811\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2022.012811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

质量源于设计是萃取物和浸出物安全信息交换所(ELSIE)推荐的萃取物和浸出物(E&Ls)风险管理框架的基础。在医药产品开发的材料选择过程中,遵循这些原则可以最大限度地减少药物产品中高毒性物质的存在,并降低潜在浸出物对健康造成的风险。因此,在广泛的化学品领域中,必须将 E&L 区分为化学品的一个子集,并对这一相关化学空间进行评估,以得出适当的分析和安全阈值。在考虑 E&Ls 对健康的危害时,一个具有挑战性的领域是了解其致敏性以及是否会对患者构成风险。我们对 ELSIE 编制的 E&L 数据集(n = 466)进行了分析,以确定该化学子集中皮肤致敏物质的普遍性和有效性,并探索一种科学合理的方法来评估肠外药物产品中潜在浸出物的致敏性。约有一半的化合物(56%,259/466)在 ELSIE 数据库中记录了致敏数据,其中 20%(52/259)是潜在的皮肤致敏物质。在具有敏化数据的 E&L 数据集中,只有 3%(8/259)的化合物在经过硅学分析和专家审查后被认为是强效(强或极强)敏化剂,这说明强效敏化剂在医药产品中并不是作为可浸出物被常规观察到的。我们的分析突出表明,在 E&L 的敏化评估过程中,硅学效价预测和专家审查是关键工具。结果证实,在材料选择方面,预计可以降低强致敏剂和/或极端致敏剂存在的风险(例如,通过 ISO 10993-10 进行可萃取测试),而按照 ICH M7 和/或 Masuda-Herrera 等人的方法实施阈值,则为建立分析测试和安全阈值提供了合理的保守方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sensitization Assessment of Extractables and Leachables in Pharmaceuticals: ELSIE Database Analysis.

Quality by design is the foundation of the risk management framework for extractables and leachables (E&Ls) recommended by the Extractables and Leachables Safety Information Exchange (ELSIE). Following these principles during the selection of materials for pharmaceutical product development minimizes the presence of highly toxic substances and decreases the health risk of potential leachables in the drug product. Therefore, in the context of the broad arena of chemicals, it is important to distinguish E&Ls as a subset of chemicals and evaluate this relevant chemical space to derive appropriate analytical and safety thresholds. When considering the health hazards posed by E&Ls, one area presenting a challenge is understanding the sensitization potential and whether it poses a risk to patients. A dataset of E&Ls compiled by ELSIE (n = 466) was analyzed to determine the prevalence and potency of skin sensitizers in this chemical subset and explore a scientifically justified approach to the sensitization assessment of potential leachables in parenteral drug products. Approximately half of the compounds (56%, 259/466) had sensitization data recorded in the ELSIE database and of these, 20% (52/259) are potential skin sensitizers. Only 3% (8/259) of the E&L dataset with sensitization data were considered potent (strong or extreme) sensitizers following in silico analysis and expert review, illustrating that potent sensitizers are not routinely observed as leachables in pharmaceutical products. Our analysis highlights that in silico potency prediction and expert review are key tools during the sensitization assessment process for E&Ls. The results confirm where material selection is anticipated to mitigate the risk of presence of strong and/or extreme sensitizers (e.g., extractable testing via ISO 10993-10), and that implementing thresholds per ICH M7 and/or Masuda-Herrera et al. provides a reasonably conservative approach for establishing the analytical testing and safety thresholds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信