[不同粪便菌群移植周期对抗生素鸡尾酒预处理小鼠肠道菌群恢复的影响]。

Zhimo Zhou, Yujie Zhang, Meixun Liu, Wen Jia, Ruyue Cheng, Xi Shen, Fang He
{"title":"[不同粪便菌群移植周期对抗生素鸡尾酒预处理小鼠肠道菌群恢复的影响]。","authors":"Zhimo Zhou,&nbsp;Yujie Zhang,&nbsp;Meixun Liu,&nbsp;Wen Jia,&nbsp;Ruyue Cheng,&nbsp;Xi Shen,&nbsp;Fang He","doi":"10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2023.04.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the effects of different transplantation frequencies and time of fecal microbiota transplantation on mice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four C57BL/6J mice were randomly divided into control group, fecal microbiota transplantation group 1(FMT1), fecal microbiota transplantation group 2(FMT2), and fecal microbiota transplantation group 3(FMT3). The control group was used as the donor of fecal microbiota transplantation, and the FMT1, FMT2, and FMT3 groups were intervened with mixed antibiotics(200 μL/d) for 2 weeks, and received fecal bacterial suspension(200 μL/d). The transplantation time of the FMT1 group frequency was 1 time/d for 1 weeks, the FMT2 group was 1 time/d for 2 weeks, and the FMT3 group was 3 times/week for 2 weeks. At the end of the experiment, the feces of the mice were collected to analyze the gut microbiota.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the control group, there were more independent Amplicon Sequence Variants in the intestinal microbiota of mice in FMT1 group, FMT2 group and FMT3 group, and the ACE index and Chao1 index were significantly reduced(P&lt;0.05). Beta diversity showed differences between fecal microbiota transplantation and control groups, with FMT2 and control groups being the closest. At the phylum level, there were two species in FMT1 group and one species in FMT3 group showed statistically significant differences compared with control group(P&lt;0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the FMT2 group and the control group. At the genus level, there were 6 species in the FMT1 with statistically significant differences from the control group(P&lt;0.05), and 2 species in the FMT2, 5 species in the FMT3 respectively. Among which FMT2 group has the least number of species that differed from the control group, suggesting that the compitsition of its intestinal microbiota is closet to that of the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fecal bacteria transplantation helps to restore the intestinal microbiota structure of mice cleaned by antibiotics, and different transplantation frequencies and transplantation times have different recovery effects on the intestinal microbiota of mice pretreated with antibiotics, and the fecal bacteria transplantation effect is better with 1 time/d lasting 2 weeks.</p>","PeriodicalId":23789,"journal":{"name":"Wei sheng yan jiu = Journal of hygiene research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Influence of different fecal microbiota transplantation cycles on the recovery of intestinal microbiota in the antibiotic cocktail-pretreated mice].\",\"authors\":\"Zhimo Zhou,&nbsp;Yujie Zhang,&nbsp;Meixun Liu,&nbsp;Wen Jia,&nbsp;Ruyue Cheng,&nbsp;Xi Shen,&nbsp;Fang He\",\"doi\":\"10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2023.04.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the effects of different transplantation frequencies and time of fecal microbiota transplantation on mice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four C57BL/6J mice were randomly divided into control group, fecal microbiota transplantation group 1(FMT1), fecal microbiota transplantation group 2(FMT2), and fecal microbiota transplantation group 3(FMT3). The control group was used as the donor of fecal microbiota transplantation, and the FMT1, FMT2, and FMT3 groups were intervened with mixed antibiotics(200 μL/d) for 2 weeks, and received fecal bacterial suspension(200 μL/d). The transplantation time of the FMT1 group frequency was 1 time/d for 1 weeks, the FMT2 group was 1 time/d for 2 weeks, and the FMT3 group was 3 times/week for 2 weeks. At the end of the experiment, the feces of the mice were collected to analyze the gut microbiota.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the control group, there were more independent Amplicon Sequence Variants in the intestinal microbiota of mice in FMT1 group, FMT2 group and FMT3 group, and the ACE index and Chao1 index were significantly reduced(P&lt;0.05). Beta diversity showed differences between fecal microbiota transplantation and control groups, with FMT2 and control groups being the closest. At the phylum level, there were two species in FMT1 group and one species in FMT3 group showed statistically significant differences compared with control group(P&lt;0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the FMT2 group and the control group. At the genus level, there were 6 species in the FMT1 with statistically significant differences from the control group(P&lt;0.05), and 2 species in the FMT2, 5 species in the FMT3 respectively. Among which FMT2 group has the least number of species that differed from the control group, suggesting that the compitsition of its intestinal microbiota is closet to that of the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fecal bacteria transplantation helps to restore the intestinal microbiota structure of mice cleaned by antibiotics, and different transplantation frequencies and transplantation times have different recovery effects on the intestinal microbiota of mice pretreated with antibiotics, and the fecal bacteria transplantation effect is better with 1 time/d lasting 2 weeks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wei sheng yan jiu = Journal of hygiene research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wei sheng yan jiu = Journal of hygiene research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2023.04.011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wei sheng yan jiu = Journal of hygiene research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2023.04.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨不同频率和时间的粪便菌群移植对小鼠的影响。方法:24只C57BL/6J小鼠随机分为对照组、粪便菌群移植1组(FMT1)、粪便菌群移植2组(FMT2)和粪便菌群移植3组(FMT3)。对照组作为粪便菌群移植供体,FMT1、FMT2、FMT3组给予混合抗生素(200 μL/d)干预2周,并给予粪便菌悬液(200 μL/d)。FMT1组移植时间频率为1次/d,持续1周,FMT2组为1次/d,持续2周,FMT3组为3次/周,持续2周。实验结束时,收集小鼠粪便,分析肠道菌群。结果:与对照组相比,FMT1组、FMT2组和FMT3组小鼠肠道菌群中存在更多独立的Amplicon Sequence变异体,ACE指数和Chao1指数显著降低(P<0.05)。粪便微生物群的多样性在移植组与对照组之间存在差异,其中FMT2与对照组最接近。在门水平上,FMT1组有2种,FMT3组有1种,与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。然而,FMT2组与对照组之间无显著差异。在属水平上,FMT1中有6种,与对照组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05), FMT2中有2种,FMT3中有5种。其中FMT2组与对照组差异物种最少,说明其肠道菌群组成与对照组较为接近。结论:粪菌移植有助于恢复抗生素清洗后小鼠肠道菌群结构,不同移植频率和移植次数对抗生素预处理小鼠肠道菌群恢复效果不同,以1次/d、持续2周效果较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Influence of different fecal microbiota transplantation cycles on the recovery of intestinal microbiota in the antibiotic cocktail-pretreated mice].

Objective: To explore the effects of different transplantation frequencies and time of fecal microbiota transplantation on mice.

Methods: Twenty-four C57BL/6J mice were randomly divided into control group, fecal microbiota transplantation group 1(FMT1), fecal microbiota transplantation group 2(FMT2), and fecal microbiota transplantation group 3(FMT3). The control group was used as the donor of fecal microbiota transplantation, and the FMT1, FMT2, and FMT3 groups were intervened with mixed antibiotics(200 μL/d) for 2 weeks, and received fecal bacterial suspension(200 μL/d). The transplantation time of the FMT1 group frequency was 1 time/d for 1 weeks, the FMT2 group was 1 time/d for 2 weeks, and the FMT3 group was 3 times/week for 2 weeks. At the end of the experiment, the feces of the mice were collected to analyze the gut microbiota.

Results: Compared with the control group, there were more independent Amplicon Sequence Variants in the intestinal microbiota of mice in FMT1 group, FMT2 group and FMT3 group, and the ACE index and Chao1 index were significantly reduced(P<0.05). Beta diversity showed differences between fecal microbiota transplantation and control groups, with FMT2 and control groups being the closest. At the phylum level, there were two species in FMT1 group and one species in FMT3 group showed statistically significant differences compared with control group(P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the FMT2 group and the control group. At the genus level, there were 6 species in the FMT1 with statistically significant differences from the control group(P<0.05), and 2 species in the FMT2, 5 species in the FMT3 respectively. Among which FMT2 group has the least number of species that differed from the control group, suggesting that the compitsition of its intestinal microbiota is closet to that of the control group.

Conclusion: Fecal bacteria transplantation helps to restore the intestinal microbiota structure of mice cleaned by antibiotics, and different transplantation frequencies and transplantation times have different recovery effects on the intestinal microbiota of mice pretreated with antibiotics, and the fecal bacteria transplantation effect is better with 1 time/d lasting 2 weeks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信