安全可耐受闭环深部脑刺激的斜坡速率评估和配置。

Matthew N Petrucci, Kevin B Wilkins, Gerrit C Orthlieb, Yasmine M Kehnemouyi, Johanna J O'Day, Jeffrey A Herron, Helen M Bronte-Stewart
{"title":"安全可耐受闭环深部脑刺激的斜坡速率评估和配置。","authors":"Matthew N Petrucci,&nbsp;Kevin B Wilkins,&nbsp;Gerrit C Orthlieb,&nbsp;Yasmine M Kehnemouyi,&nbsp;Johanna J O'Day,&nbsp;Jeffrey A Herron,&nbsp;Helen M Bronte-Stewart","doi":"10.1109/ner49283.2021.9441336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Closed-loop deep brain stimulation is a novel form of therapy that has shown benefit in preliminary studies and may be clinically available in the near future. Initial closed-loop studies have primarily focused on responding to sensed biomarkers with adjustments to stimulation amplitude, which is often perceptible to study participants depending on the slew or \"ramp\" rate of the amplitude changes. These subjective responses to stimulation ramping can result in transient side effects, illustrating that ramp rate is a unique safety parameter for closed-loop neural systems. This presents a challenge to the future of closed-loop neuromodulation systems: depending on the goal of the control policy, clinicians will need to balance ramp rates to avoid side effects and keep the stimulation therapeutic by responding in time to affect neural dynamics. In this paper, we demonstrate the results of an initial investigation into methodology for finding safe and tolerable ramp rates in four people with Parkinson's disease (PD). Results suggest that optimal ramp rates were found more accurately during varying stimulation when compared to simply toggling between maximal and minimal intensity levels. Additionally, switching frequency instantaneously was tolerable at therapeutic levels of stimulation. Future work should focus on including optimization techniques to find ramp rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":73414,"journal":{"name":"International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering : [proceedings]. International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering","volume":"2021 ","pages":"959-962"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/ner49283.2021.9441336","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ramp Rate Evaluation and Configuration for Safe and Tolerable Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew N Petrucci,&nbsp;Kevin B Wilkins,&nbsp;Gerrit C Orthlieb,&nbsp;Yasmine M Kehnemouyi,&nbsp;Johanna J O'Day,&nbsp;Jeffrey A Herron,&nbsp;Helen M Bronte-Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ner49283.2021.9441336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Closed-loop deep brain stimulation is a novel form of therapy that has shown benefit in preliminary studies and may be clinically available in the near future. Initial closed-loop studies have primarily focused on responding to sensed biomarkers with adjustments to stimulation amplitude, which is often perceptible to study participants depending on the slew or \\\"ramp\\\" rate of the amplitude changes. These subjective responses to stimulation ramping can result in transient side effects, illustrating that ramp rate is a unique safety parameter for closed-loop neural systems. This presents a challenge to the future of closed-loop neuromodulation systems: depending on the goal of the control policy, clinicians will need to balance ramp rates to avoid side effects and keep the stimulation therapeutic by responding in time to affect neural dynamics. In this paper, we demonstrate the results of an initial investigation into methodology for finding safe and tolerable ramp rates in four people with Parkinson's disease (PD). Results suggest that optimal ramp rates were found more accurately during varying stimulation when compared to simply toggling between maximal and minimal intensity levels. Additionally, switching frequency instantaneously was tolerable at therapeutic levels of stimulation. Future work should focus on including optimization techniques to find ramp rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering : [proceedings]. International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering\",\"volume\":\"2021 \",\"pages\":\"959-962\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/ner49283.2021.9441336\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering : [proceedings]. International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ner49283.2021.9441336\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering : [proceedings]. International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ner49283.2021.9441336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

闭环深部脑刺激是一种新颖的治疗形式,在初步研究中显示出益处,并可能在不久的将来临床应用。最初的闭环研究主要集中在通过调整刺激幅度来响应感知的生物标志物,这通常是根据幅度变化的幅度或“斜坡”速率来感知的。这些对刺激斜坡的主观反应可能会导致短暂的副作用,这表明斜坡速率是闭环神经系统的一个独特的安全参数。这对闭环神经调节系统的未来提出了挑战:根据控制政策的目标,临床医生需要平衡斜坡率以避免副作用,并通过及时响应以影响神经动力学来保持刺激的治疗性。在本文中,我们展示了在四名帕金森病患者(PD)中寻找安全和可耐受的斜坡率的初步调查方法的结果。结果表明,与简单地在最大和最小强度水平之间切换相比,在不同的刺激过程中更准确地找到最佳斜坡速率。此外,在治疗水平的刺激下,瞬时开关频率是可以忍受的。未来的工作应该集中在包括优化技术,以找到斜坡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ramp Rate Evaluation and Configuration for Safe and Tolerable Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation.

Closed-loop deep brain stimulation is a novel form of therapy that has shown benefit in preliminary studies and may be clinically available in the near future. Initial closed-loop studies have primarily focused on responding to sensed biomarkers with adjustments to stimulation amplitude, which is often perceptible to study participants depending on the slew or "ramp" rate of the amplitude changes. These subjective responses to stimulation ramping can result in transient side effects, illustrating that ramp rate is a unique safety parameter for closed-loop neural systems. This presents a challenge to the future of closed-loop neuromodulation systems: depending on the goal of the control policy, clinicians will need to balance ramp rates to avoid side effects and keep the stimulation therapeutic by responding in time to affect neural dynamics. In this paper, we demonstrate the results of an initial investigation into methodology for finding safe and tolerable ramp rates in four people with Parkinson's disease (PD). Results suggest that optimal ramp rates were found more accurately during varying stimulation when compared to simply toggling between maximal and minimal intensity levels. Additionally, switching frequency instantaneously was tolerable at therapeutic levels of stimulation. Future work should focus on including optimization techniques to find ramp rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信