{"title":"一项随机对照试验:利多卡因和碱化利多卡因用于机械通气患者的镇静和镇痛需求。","authors":"V K Saingur, S Naaz, E Ozair, A Asghar","doi":"10.7196/SAJCC.2022.v38i1.484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Airway irritation caused by prolonged inflation of endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff results in post-intubation morbidities.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to study intracuff lidocaine and alkalised lidocaine on sedation or analgesia requirements of patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU). The primary outcome was to calculate the total dose of propofol and fentanyl required to obtund the unwanted airway and circulatory reflexes. Secondary outcomes were to determine the frequency and severity of cough and haemodynamic parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It was a double-blinded, randomised controlled study in the ICU after emergency laparotomy, in patients aged 20 - 55 years, and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classes 1E and 2E with tube <i>in situ</i>. Exclusion criteria were patients with body mass index >30 kg/m² , haemodynamic instability, requiring positive end-expiratory pressure ≥7 cm H<sub>2</sub>O, and a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. After ethics clearance and written consent, patients were randomly assigned into two groups (36 in each), Group L (ETT cuff inflated with lidocaine 2%) and Group AL (cuff inflated with a mixture of lidocaine 2% and sodium bicarbonate 1:1).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean dose of propofol consumed in Group AL was significantly less than that in Group L (p<0.001). The mean standard deviation (SD) fentanyl utilisation in Group AL was 1 323.61 (187.27) µg, and that in Group L was 1433.09 (42.58) µg (p=0.040). Group L patients had a significantly higher incidence of cough than those in Group AL (p=0.01). There was no significant difference in the mean arterial pressure (p=0.22), although heart rate was significantly higher in Group L (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Alkalised lidocaine reduces the requirement of sedation, analgesia, and the incidence of cough in intubated patients maintaining haemodynamic stability when compared with lidocaine.</p><p><strong>Contributions of the study: </strong>Alkalised lidocaine when used in endotracheal tube cuff inflation reduces the need for sedation and analgesia in mechanically-ventilated patients, and improves haemodynamic stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":75194,"journal":{"name":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/15/f7/SAJCC-38-1-484.PMC9132076.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A randomised controlled trial of intracuff lidocaine and alkalised lidocaine for sedation and analgesia requirements in mechanically ventilated patients.\",\"authors\":\"V K Saingur, S Naaz, E Ozair, A Asghar\",\"doi\":\"10.7196/SAJCC.2022.v38i1.484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Airway irritation caused by prolonged inflation of endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff results in post-intubation morbidities.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to study intracuff lidocaine and alkalised lidocaine on sedation or analgesia requirements of patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU). The primary outcome was to calculate the total dose of propofol and fentanyl required to obtund the unwanted airway and circulatory reflexes. Secondary outcomes were to determine the frequency and severity of cough and haemodynamic parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It was a double-blinded, randomised controlled study in the ICU after emergency laparotomy, in patients aged 20 - 55 years, and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classes 1E and 2E with tube <i>in situ</i>. Exclusion criteria were patients with body mass index >30 kg/m² , haemodynamic instability, requiring positive end-expiratory pressure ≥7 cm H<sub>2</sub>O, and a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. After ethics clearance and written consent, patients were randomly assigned into two groups (36 in each), Group L (ETT cuff inflated with lidocaine 2%) and Group AL (cuff inflated with a mixture of lidocaine 2% and sodium bicarbonate 1:1).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean dose of propofol consumed in Group AL was significantly less than that in Group L (p<0.001). The mean standard deviation (SD) fentanyl utilisation in Group AL was 1 323.61 (187.27) µg, and that in Group L was 1433.09 (42.58) µg (p=0.040). Group L patients had a significantly higher incidence of cough than those in Group AL (p=0.01). There was no significant difference in the mean arterial pressure (p=0.22), although heart rate was significantly higher in Group L (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Alkalised lidocaine reduces the requirement of sedation, analgesia, and the incidence of cough in intubated patients maintaining haemodynamic stability when compared with lidocaine.</p><p><strong>Contributions of the study: </strong>Alkalised lidocaine when used in endotracheal tube cuff inflation reduces the need for sedation and analgesia in mechanically-ventilated patients, and improves haemodynamic stability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/15/f7/SAJCC-38-1-484.PMC9132076.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2022.v38i1.484\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2022.v38i1.484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:气管内插管(ETT)袖口长时间膨胀引起的气道刺激可导致插管后的并发症。目的:我们旨在研究利多卡因和碱化利多卡因对重症监护病房(ICU)机械通气患者镇静或镇痛需求的影响。主要结果是计算消除不需要的气道和循环反射所需的异丙酚和芬太尼的总剂量。次要结局是确定咳嗽的频率和严重程度以及血流动力学参数。方法:采用双盲、随机对照研究,患者年龄为20 ~ 55岁,在急诊剖腹手术后ICU进行,美国麻醉医师学会(ASA) 1E和2E分类,原位置管。排除标准为体重指数>30 kg/m²、血流动力学不稳定、呼气末正压≥7 cm H2O、有慢性阻塞性肺疾病史的患者。经伦理许可和书面同意后,将患者随机分为两组(每组36例),L组(2%利多卡因充气ETT袖带)和AL组(2%利多卡因和1:1碳酸氢钠的混合物充气)。结果:AL组异丙酚平均用量明显小于L组(p)。结论:与利多卡因相比,碱化利多卡因可降低维持血流动力学稳定的插管患者镇静、镇痛的需氧量和咳嗽的发生率。研究贡献:碱化利多卡因用于气管内套管充气时,减少了机械通气患者对镇静和镇痛的需要,并改善了血流动力学稳定性。
A randomised controlled trial of intracuff lidocaine and alkalised lidocaine for sedation and analgesia requirements in mechanically ventilated patients.
Background: Airway irritation caused by prolonged inflation of endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff results in post-intubation morbidities.
Objectives: We aimed to study intracuff lidocaine and alkalised lidocaine on sedation or analgesia requirements of patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU). The primary outcome was to calculate the total dose of propofol and fentanyl required to obtund the unwanted airway and circulatory reflexes. Secondary outcomes were to determine the frequency and severity of cough and haemodynamic parameters.
Methods: It was a double-blinded, randomised controlled study in the ICU after emergency laparotomy, in patients aged 20 - 55 years, and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classes 1E and 2E with tube in situ. Exclusion criteria were patients with body mass index >30 kg/m² , haemodynamic instability, requiring positive end-expiratory pressure ≥7 cm H2O, and a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. After ethics clearance and written consent, patients were randomly assigned into two groups (36 in each), Group L (ETT cuff inflated with lidocaine 2%) and Group AL (cuff inflated with a mixture of lidocaine 2% and sodium bicarbonate 1:1).
Results: Mean dose of propofol consumed in Group AL was significantly less than that in Group L (p<0.001). The mean standard deviation (SD) fentanyl utilisation in Group AL was 1 323.61 (187.27) µg, and that in Group L was 1433.09 (42.58) µg (p=0.040). Group L patients had a significantly higher incidence of cough than those in Group AL (p=0.01). There was no significant difference in the mean arterial pressure (p=0.22), although heart rate was significantly higher in Group L (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Alkalised lidocaine reduces the requirement of sedation, analgesia, and the incidence of cough in intubated patients maintaining haemodynamic stability when compared with lidocaine.
Contributions of the study: Alkalised lidocaine when used in endotracheal tube cuff inflation reduces the need for sedation and analgesia in mechanically-ventilated patients, and improves haemodynamic stability.