北卡罗来纳州预期寿命的不平等:健康社会决定因素的空间分析和极端浓度指数。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Jessica H Mitchell, Jennifer D Runkle, Lauren M Andersen, Elizabeth Shay, Margaret M Sugg
{"title":"北卡罗来纳州预期寿命的不平等:健康社会决定因素的空间分析和极端浓度指数。","authors":"Jessica H Mitchell,&nbsp;Jennifer D Runkle,&nbsp;Lauren M Andersen,&nbsp;Elizabeth Shay,&nbsp;Margaret M Sugg","doi":"10.1097/FCH.0000000000000318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health inequalities are characterized by spatial patterns of social, economic, and political factors. Life expectancy (LE) is a commonly used indicator of overall population health and health inequalities that allows for comparison across different spatial and temporal regions. The objective of this study was to examine geographic inequalities in LE across North Carolina census tracts by comparing the performance of 2 popular geospatial health indices: Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) and the Index of Concentration at Extremes (ICE). A principal components analysis (PCA) was used to address multicollinearity among variables and aggregate data into components to examine SDoH, while the ICE was constructed using the simple subtraction of geospatial variables. Spatial regression models were employed to compare both indices in relation to LE to evaluate their predictability for population health. For individual SDoH and ICE components, poverty and income had the strongest positive correlation with LE. However, the common spatial techniques of adding PCA components together for a final SDoH aggregate measure resulted in a poor relationship with LE. Results indicated that both metrics can be used to determine spatial patterns of inequities in LE and that the ICE metric has similar success to the more computationally complex SDoH metric. Public health practitioners may find the ICE metric's high predictability matched with lower data requirements to be more feasible to implement in population health monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":47183,"journal":{"name":"Family & Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inequalities in Life Expectancy Across North Carolina: A Spatial Analysis of the Social Determinants of Health and the Index of Concentration at Extremes.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica H Mitchell,&nbsp;Jennifer D Runkle,&nbsp;Lauren M Andersen,&nbsp;Elizabeth Shay,&nbsp;Margaret M Sugg\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/FCH.0000000000000318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Health inequalities are characterized by spatial patterns of social, economic, and political factors. Life expectancy (LE) is a commonly used indicator of overall population health and health inequalities that allows for comparison across different spatial and temporal regions. The objective of this study was to examine geographic inequalities in LE across North Carolina census tracts by comparing the performance of 2 popular geospatial health indices: Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) and the Index of Concentration at Extremes (ICE). A principal components analysis (PCA) was used to address multicollinearity among variables and aggregate data into components to examine SDoH, while the ICE was constructed using the simple subtraction of geospatial variables. Spatial regression models were employed to compare both indices in relation to LE to evaluate their predictability for population health. For individual SDoH and ICE components, poverty and income had the strongest positive correlation with LE. However, the common spatial techniques of adding PCA components together for a final SDoH aggregate measure resulted in a poor relationship with LE. Results indicated that both metrics can be used to determine spatial patterns of inequities in LE and that the ICE metric has similar success to the more computationally complex SDoH metric. Public health practitioners may find the ICE metric's high predictability matched with lower data requirements to be more feasible to implement in population health monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family & Community Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family & Community Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0000000000000318\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family & Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0000000000000318","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

健康不平等的特点是社会、经济和政治因素的空间格局。预期寿命是总体人口健康和健康不平等的常用指标,可用于不同空间和时间区域之间的比较。本研究的目的是通过比较两种流行的地理空间健康指数:健康的社会决定因素(SDoH)和极端浓度指数(ICE)的表现,研究北卡罗来纳州人口普查区LE的地理不平等。采用主成分分析(PCA)解决变量之间的多重共线性问题,并将数据聚合成多个分量来检验SDoH,而ICE则采用简单的地理空间变量减法来构建。采用空间回归模型比较这两个指数与LE的关系,以评估它们对人口健康的可预测性。在个体SDoH和ICE成分中,贫困和收入与LE的正相关最强。然而,将PCA分量加在一起以获得最终的SDoH聚合度量的常见空间技术导致与LE的关系很差。结果表明,这两个指标都可以用来确定LE不平等的空间格局,并且ICE指标与计算更复杂的SDoH指标具有相似的成功。公共卫生从业人员可能会发现ICE指标的高可预测性与较低的数据要求相匹配,在人口健康监测中实施更可行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inequalities in Life Expectancy Across North Carolina: A Spatial Analysis of the Social Determinants of Health and the Index of Concentration at Extremes.

Health inequalities are characterized by spatial patterns of social, economic, and political factors. Life expectancy (LE) is a commonly used indicator of overall population health and health inequalities that allows for comparison across different spatial and temporal regions. The objective of this study was to examine geographic inequalities in LE across North Carolina census tracts by comparing the performance of 2 popular geospatial health indices: Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) and the Index of Concentration at Extremes (ICE). A principal components analysis (PCA) was used to address multicollinearity among variables and aggregate data into components to examine SDoH, while the ICE was constructed using the simple subtraction of geospatial variables. Spatial regression models were employed to compare both indices in relation to LE to evaluate their predictability for population health. For individual SDoH and ICE components, poverty and income had the strongest positive correlation with LE. However, the common spatial techniques of adding PCA components together for a final SDoH aggregate measure resulted in a poor relationship with LE. Results indicated that both metrics can be used to determine spatial patterns of inequities in LE and that the ICE metric has similar success to the more computationally complex SDoH metric. Public health practitioners may find the ICE metric's high predictability matched with lower data requirements to be more feasible to implement in population health monitoring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Family & Community Health is a practical quarterly which presents creative, multidisciplinary perspectives and approaches for effective public and community health programs. Each issue focuses on a single timely topic and addresses issues of concern to a wide variety of population groups with diverse ethnic backgrounds, including children and the elderly, men and women, and rural and urban communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信