麻醉提供者作为利益相关者在围手术期护理中采用药物基因组学信息。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Tien M Truong, Jeffrey L Apfelbaum, Emily Schierer, Keith Danahey, Brittany A Borden, Theodore Karrison, Sajid Shahul, Magdalena Anitescu, Rebecca Gerlach, Randall W Knoebel, David O Meltzer, Mark J Ratain, Peter H O'Donnell
{"title":"麻醉提供者作为利益相关者在围手术期护理中采用药物基因组学信息。","authors":"Tien M Truong,&nbsp;Jeffrey L Apfelbaum,&nbsp;Emily Schierer,&nbsp;Keith Danahey,&nbsp;Brittany A Borden,&nbsp;Theodore Karrison,&nbsp;Sajid Shahul,&nbsp;Magdalena Anitescu,&nbsp;Rebecca Gerlach,&nbsp;Randall W Knoebel,&nbsp;David O Meltzer,&nbsp;Mark J Ratain,&nbsp;Peter H O'Donnell","doi":"10.1097/FPC.0000000000000455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Integration of pharmacogenomics into clinical care is being studied in multiple disciplines. We hypothesized that understanding attitudes and perceptions of anesthesiologists, critical care and pain medicine providers would uncover unique considerations for future implementation within perioperative care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey (multiple choice and Likert-scale) was administered to providers within our Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care prior to initiation of a department-wide prospective pharmacogenomics implementation program. The survey addressed knowledge, perceptions, experiences, resources and barriers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 153 providers contacted, 149 (97%) completed the survey. Almost all providers (92%) said that genetic results influence drug therapy, and few (22%) were skeptical about the usefulness of pharmacogenomics. Despite this enthusiasm, 87% said their awareness about pharmacogenomic information is lacking. Feeling well-informed about pharmacogenomics was directly related to years in practice/experience: only 38% of trainees reported being well-informed, compared to 46% of those with 1-10 years of experience, and nearly two-thirds with 11+ years (P < 0.05). Regarding barriers, providers reported uncertainty about availability of testing, turnaround time and whether testing is worth financial costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anesthesiology, critical care and pain medicine providers are optimistic about the potential clinical utility of pharmacogenomics, but are uncertain about practical aspects of testing and desire clear guidelines on the use of results. These findings may inform future institutional efforts toward greater integration of genomic results to improve medication-related outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"32 3","pages":"79-86"},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8940738/pdf/nihms-1728765.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anesthesia providers as stakeholders to adoption of pharmacogenomic information in perioperative care.\",\"authors\":\"Tien M Truong,&nbsp;Jeffrey L Apfelbaum,&nbsp;Emily Schierer,&nbsp;Keith Danahey,&nbsp;Brittany A Borden,&nbsp;Theodore Karrison,&nbsp;Sajid Shahul,&nbsp;Magdalena Anitescu,&nbsp;Rebecca Gerlach,&nbsp;Randall W Knoebel,&nbsp;David O Meltzer,&nbsp;Mark J Ratain,&nbsp;Peter H O'Donnell\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/FPC.0000000000000455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Integration of pharmacogenomics into clinical care is being studied in multiple disciplines. We hypothesized that understanding attitudes and perceptions of anesthesiologists, critical care and pain medicine providers would uncover unique considerations for future implementation within perioperative care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey (multiple choice and Likert-scale) was administered to providers within our Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care prior to initiation of a department-wide prospective pharmacogenomics implementation program. The survey addressed knowledge, perceptions, experiences, resources and barriers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 153 providers contacted, 149 (97%) completed the survey. Almost all providers (92%) said that genetic results influence drug therapy, and few (22%) were skeptical about the usefulness of pharmacogenomics. Despite this enthusiasm, 87% said their awareness about pharmacogenomic information is lacking. Feeling well-informed about pharmacogenomics was directly related to years in practice/experience: only 38% of trainees reported being well-informed, compared to 46% of those with 1-10 years of experience, and nearly two-thirds with 11+ years (P < 0.05). Regarding barriers, providers reported uncertainty about availability of testing, turnaround time and whether testing is worth financial costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anesthesiology, critical care and pain medicine providers are optimistic about the potential clinical utility of pharmacogenomics, but are uncertain about practical aspects of testing and desire clear guidelines on the use of results. These findings may inform future institutional efforts toward greater integration of genomic results to improve medication-related outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"79-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8940738/pdf/nihms-1728765.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/FPC.0000000000000455\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FPC.0000000000000455","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:药物基因组学与临床护理的整合正在多个学科中进行研究。我们假设,了解麻醉师、重症监护和止痛药提供者的态度和看法,将为未来围手术期护理的实施提供独特的考虑因素。方法:在开始全科范围的前瞻性药物基因组学实施计划之前,对我们麻醉和重症监护科的提供者进行了一项调查(多项选择和李克特量表)。调查涉及知识、观念、经验、资源和障碍。结果:在联系的153家提供者中,149家(97%)完成了调查。几乎所有的提供者(92%)都表示基因结果会影响药物治疗,很少有人(22%)对药物基因组学的有用性持怀疑态度。尽管有这种热情,87%的人表示他们对药物基因组学信息缺乏认识。感觉对药物基因组学的了解程度与实践/经验的年数直接相关:只有38%的学员报告对药物基因组学的了解程度,相比之下,1-10年经验的学员占46%,11年以上经验的学员占近三分之二(P < 0.05)。关于障碍,供应商报告了测试的可用性、周转时间和测试是否值得花费财务成本的不确定性。结论:麻醉学、重症监护和止痛药提供者对药物基因组学的潜在临床应用持乐观态度,但对测试的实际方面不确定,并希望对结果的使用有明确的指导方针。这些发现可能为未来的机构努力提供信息,以更好地整合基因组结果,以改善与药物相关的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anesthesia providers as stakeholders to adoption of pharmacogenomic information in perioperative care.

Objectives: Integration of pharmacogenomics into clinical care is being studied in multiple disciplines. We hypothesized that understanding attitudes and perceptions of anesthesiologists, critical care and pain medicine providers would uncover unique considerations for future implementation within perioperative care.

Methods: A survey (multiple choice and Likert-scale) was administered to providers within our Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care prior to initiation of a department-wide prospective pharmacogenomics implementation program. The survey addressed knowledge, perceptions, experiences, resources and barriers.

Results: Of 153 providers contacted, 149 (97%) completed the survey. Almost all providers (92%) said that genetic results influence drug therapy, and few (22%) were skeptical about the usefulness of pharmacogenomics. Despite this enthusiasm, 87% said their awareness about pharmacogenomic information is lacking. Feeling well-informed about pharmacogenomics was directly related to years in practice/experience: only 38% of trainees reported being well-informed, compared to 46% of those with 1-10 years of experience, and nearly two-thirds with 11+ years (P < 0.05). Regarding barriers, providers reported uncertainty about availability of testing, turnaround time and whether testing is worth financial costs.

Conclusions: Anesthesiology, critical care and pain medicine providers are optimistic about the potential clinical utility of pharmacogenomics, but are uncertain about practical aspects of testing and desire clear guidelines on the use of results. These findings may inform future institutional efforts toward greater integration of genomic results to improve medication-related outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信