CFTR调节剂治疗在澳大利亚成人和儿童中的真实世界结果

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Stephanie Kuek , Angela McCullagh , Eldho Paul , David Armstrong
{"title":"CFTR调节剂治疗在澳大利亚成人和儿童中的真实世界结果","authors":"Stephanie Kuek ,&nbsp;Angela McCullagh ,&nbsp;Eldho Paul ,&nbsp;David Armstrong","doi":"10.1016/j.pupt.2023.102247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Recent advances in CFTR modulator therapy have the potential to change the face of cystic fibrosis (CF). This retrospective observational study describes real world experience of the four available CFTR modulators in adults and children with CF in a single centre in Melbourne, Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Data were collected for all patients treated with CFTR modulators at MonashCF between May 2012 and September 2020. Primary outcomes included lung function, admission days and BMI/BMI centile over time. Adverse events and reasons for changing or ceasing medications were also analysed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>55% (74/133) adult and 46% (55/119) paediatric patients were treated with CFTR modulators. FEV1<span> increased in adults treated with ivacaftor (IVA) and elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) by 4.73% and 10.07% respectively, and </span></span>BMI also improved in these groups. Nutrition improved in adults and children treated with lumacaftor/ivacaftor (LUM/IVA). There was no significant improvement in FEV1 or admission days with LUM/IVA or tezacaftor/ivacaftor (TEZ/IVA). 36% (31/85) ceased LUM/IVA, due to adverse effects in 81% (25/31). Of these, 92% (23/25) changed to TEZ/IVA, 78% (18/23) without significant adverse effects.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings for LUM/IVA and TEZ/IVA are less encouraging than those seen in clinical trials, with no significant improvement in lung function or admission days and a higher rate of adverse effects with LUM/IVA compared with phase 3 clinical trials. TEZ/IVA was generally well tolerated by those who experienced side effects with LUM/IVA. The small number of patients treated with ELX/TEZ/IVA had improvements in all parameters. These findings support ongoing use of IVA for individuals with gating mutations, and transition to ELX/TEZ/IVA once available for patients with at least one Phe508del mutation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20799,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 102247"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real world outcomes of CFTR modulator therapy in Australian adults and children\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Kuek ,&nbsp;Angela McCullagh ,&nbsp;Eldho Paul ,&nbsp;David Armstrong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pupt.2023.102247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Recent advances in CFTR modulator therapy have the potential to change the face of cystic fibrosis (CF). This retrospective observational study describes real world experience of the four available CFTR modulators in adults and children with CF in a single centre in Melbourne, Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Data were collected for all patients treated with CFTR modulators at MonashCF between May 2012 and September 2020. Primary outcomes included lung function, admission days and BMI/BMI centile over time. Adverse events and reasons for changing or ceasing medications were also analysed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>55% (74/133) adult and 46% (55/119) paediatric patients were treated with CFTR modulators. FEV1<span> increased in adults treated with ivacaftor (IVA) and elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) by 4.73% and 10.07% respectively, and </span></span>BMI also improved in these groups. Nutrition improved in adults and children treated with lumacaftor/ivacaftor (LUM/IVA). There was no significant improvement in FEV1 or admission days with LUM/IVA or tezacaftor/ivacaftor (TEZ/IVA). 36% (31/85) ceased LUM/IVA, due to adverse effects in 81% (25/31). Of these, 92% (23/25) changed to TEZ/IVA, 78% (18/23) without significant adverse effects.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings for LUM/IVA and TEZ/IVA are less encouraging than those seen in clinical trials, with no significant improvement in lung function or admission days and a higher rate of adverse effects with LUM/IVA compared with phase 3 clinical trials. TEZ/IVA was generally well tolerated by those who experienced side effects with LUM/IVA. The small number of patients treated with ELX/TEZ/IVA had improvements in all parameters. These findings support ongoing use of IVA for individuals with gating mutations, and transition to ELX/TEZ/IVA once available for patients with at least one Phe508del mutation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094553923000597\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094553923000597","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景CFTR调节剂治疗的最新进展有可能改变囊性纤维化(CF)的面貌。这项回顾性观察性研究描述了在澳大利亚墨尔本的一个中心,在成人和儿童CF中使用四种可用的CFTR调节剂的真实世界体验。方法收集2012年5月至2020年9月期间在MonashCF接受CFTR调节剂治疗的所有患者的数据。主要结果包括肺功能、入院天数和随时间变化的BMI/BMI百分位数。还分析了不良事件以及改变或停止用药的原因。结果55%(74/133)的成人和46%(55/119)的儿科患者接受了CFTR调节剂的治疗。艾伐卡福(IVA)和依沙卡福/替扎卡福/艾伐卡佛(ELX/TEZ/IVA)治疗的成人FEV1分别增加4.73%和10.07%,这些组的BMI也有所改善。接受鲁马卡福/依伐卡福治疗的成人和儿童的营养状况有所改善。LUM/IVA或替扎卡托/依伐卡托(TEZ/IVA)的FEV1或入院天数没有显著改善。36%(31/85)的患者因81%(25/31)的不良反应而停止LUM/IVA。其中92%(23/25)改为TEZ/IVA,78%(18/23)无明显不良反应。结论我们对LUM/IVA和TEZ/IVA的研究结果不如临床试验中令人鼓舞,与3期临床试验相比,肺功能或入院天数没有显著改善,LUM/IVA的不良反应发生率更高。那些经历LUM/IVA副作用的患者通常对TEZ/IVA具有良好的耐受性。少数接受ELX/TEZ/IVA治疗的患者所有参数均有改善。这些发现支持IVA对具有门控突变的个体的持续使用,以及一旦对具有至少一个Phe508del突变的患者可用,就向ELX/TEZ/IVA过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real world outcomes of CFTR modulator therapy in Australian adults and children

Background

Recent advances in CFTR modulator therapy have the potential to change the face of cystic fibrosis (CF). This retrospective observational study describes real world experience of the four available CFTR modulators in adults and children with CF in a single centre in Melbourne, Australia.

Method

Data were collected for all patients treated with CFTR modulators at MonashCF between May 2012 and September 2020. Primary outcomes included lung function, admission days and BMI/BMI centile over time. Adverse events and reasons for changing or ceasing medications were also analysed.

Results

55% (74/133) adult and 46% (55/119) paediatric patients were treated with CFTR modulators. FEV1 increased in adults treated with ivacaftor (IVA) and elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) by 4.73% and 10.07% respectively, and BMI also improved in these groups. Nutrition improved in adults and children treated with lumacaftor/ivacaftor (LUM/IVA). There was no significant improvement in FEV1 or admission days with LUM/IVA or tezacaftor/ivacaftor (TEZ/IVA). 36% (31/85) ceased LUM/IVA, due to adverse effects in 81% (25/31). Of these, 92% (23/25) changed to TEZ/IVA, 78% (18/23) without significant adverse effects.

Conclusions

Our findings for LUM/IVA and TEZ/IVA are less encouraging than those seen in clinical trials, with no significant improvement in lung function or admission days and a higher rate of adverse effects with LUM/IVA compared with phase 3 clinical trials. TEZ/IVA was generally well tolerated by those who experienced side effects with LUM/IVA. The small number of patients treated with ELX/TEZ/IVA had improvements in all parameters. These findings support ongoing use of IVA for individuals with gating mutations, and transition to ELX/TEZ/IVA once available for patients with at least one Phe508del mutation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Pulmonary Pharmacology and Therapeutics (formerly Pulmonary Pharmacology) is concerned with lung pharmacology from molecular to clinical aspects. The subject matter encompasses the major diseases of the lung including asthma, cystic fibrosis, pulmonary circulation, ARDS, carcinoma, bronchitis, emphysema and drug delivery. Laboratory and clinical research on man and animals will be considered including studies related to chemotherapy of cancer, tuberculosis and infection. In addition to original research papers the journal will include review articles and book reviews. Research Areas Include: • All major diseases of the lung • Physiology • Pathology • Drug delivery • Metabolism • Pulmonary Toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信