评估影响对减少差异干预措施的承诺的因素:社会正义态度和组织使命。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jill A Marsteller, Yea-Jen Hsu, Kristina Weeks, Modupe Oduwole, Romsai T Boonyasai, Gideon D Avornu, Katherine B Dietz, Zehui Zhou, Deven Brown, Anika Hines, Suna Chung, Lisa Lubomski, Kathryn A Carson, Chidinma Ibe, Lisa A Cooper
{"title":"评估影响对减少差异干预措施的承诺的因素:社会正义态度和组织使命。","authors":"Jill A Marsteller, Yea-Jen Hsu, Kristina Weeks, Modupe Oduwole, Romsai T Boonyasai, Gideon D Avornu, Katherine B Dietz, Zehui Zhou, Deven Brown, Anika Hines, Suna Chung, Lisa Lubomski, Kathryn A Carson, Chidinma Ibe, Lisa A Cooper","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This mixed-methods study aims to understand what the perceptions of leaders and healthcare professionals are regarding causes of disparities, cultural competence, and motivation before launching a disparity reduction project in hypertension care, contrasting perceptions in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), and in a non-FQHC system. We interviewed leaders of six participating primary care systems and surveyed providers and staff. FQHC respondents reported more positive cultural competence attitudes and behavior, higher motivation to implement the project, and less concern about barriers to caring for disadvantaged patients than those in the non-FQHC practices; however, egalitarian beliefs were similar among all. Qualitative analysis suggested that the organizational missions of the FQHCs reflect their critical role in serving vulnerable populations. All system leaders were aware of the challenges of provider care to underserved groups, but comprehensive initiatives to address social determinants of health and improve cultural competence were still needed in both system types. The study provides insights into the perceptions and motivations of primary care organizational leaders and providers who are interested in improving chronic care. It also offers an example for care disparity programs to understand commitment and values of the participants for tailoring interventions and setting baseline for progress.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":"45 4","pages":"209-219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10498376/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Factors Influencing Commitment to a Disparities Reduction Intervention: Social Justice Attitudes and Organizational Mission.\",\"authors\":\"Jill A Marsteller, Yea-Jen Hsu, Kristina Weeks, Modupe Oduwole, Romsai T Boonyasai, Gideon D Avornu, Katherine B Dietz, Zehui Zhou, Deven Brown, Anika Hines, Suna Chung, Lisa Lubomski, Kathryn A Carson, Chidinma Ibe, Lisa A Cooper\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This mixed-methods study aims to understand what the perceptions of leaders and healthcare professionals are regarding causes of disparities, cultural competence, and motivation before launching a disparity reduction project in hypertension care, contrasting perceptions in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), and in a non-FQHC system. We interviewed leaders of six participating primary care systems and surveyed providers and staff. FQHC respondents reported more positive cultural competence attitudes and behavior, higher motivation to implement the project, and less concern about barriers to caring for disadvantaged patients than those in the non-FQHC practices; however, egalitarian beliefs were similar among all. Qualitative analysis suggested that the organizational missions of the FQHCs reflect their critical role in serving vulnerable populations. All system leaders were aware of the challenges of provider care to underserved groups, but comprehensive initiatives to address social determinants of health and improve cultural competence were still needed in both system types. The study provides insights into the perceptions and motivations of primary care organizational leaders and providers who are interested in improving chronic care. It also offers an example for care disparity programs to understand commitment and values of the participants for tailoring interventions and setting baseline for progress.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Healthcare Quality\",\"volume\":\"45 4\",\"pages\":\"209-219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10498376/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Healthcare Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000385\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000385","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:这项混合方法研究旨在了解领导者和医疗保健专业人员在高血压护理中开展减少差异项目之前,对差异原因、文化能力和动机的看法,对比联邦合格医疗中心(FQHC)和非联邦合格医疗中心系统的看法。我们采访了六个参与项目的初级医疗系统的负责人,并对医疗服务提供者和员工进行了调查。与非联邦合格医疗中心的受访者相比,联邦合格医疗中心的受访者报告了更积极的文化能力态度和行为、更高的项目实施动力,以及更少的对弱势病人护理障碍的担忧;然而,所有受访者的平等主义信念是相似的。定性分析表明,联邦定量健康中心的组织使命反映了其在服务弱势群体方面的关键作用。所有系统的领导者都意识到为服务不足的群体提供医疗服务所面临的挑战,但两类系统都需要采取综合措施来解决健康的社会决定因素并提高文化素养。这项研究为有志于改善慢性病护理的初级医疗机构领导者和医疗服务提供者提供了深入的认识和动机。它还为护理差异计划提供了一个范例,使其了解参与者的承诺和价值观,从而量身定制干预措施并设定进展基线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Factors Influencing Commitment to a Disparities Reduction Intervention: Social Justice Attitudes and Organizational Mission.

Abstract: This mixed-methods study aims to understand what the perceptions of leaders and healthcare professionals are regarding causes of disparities, cultural competence, and motivation before launching a disparity reduction project in hypertension care, contrasting perceptions in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), and in a non-FQHC system. We interviewed leaders of six participating primary care systems and surveyed providers and staff. FQHC respondents reported more positive cultural competence attitudes and behavior, higher motivation to implement the project, and less concern about barriers to caring for disadvantaged patients than those in the non-FQHC practices; however, egalitarian beliefs were similar among all. Qualitative analysis suggested that the organizational missions of the FQHCs reflect their critical role in serving vulnerable populations. All system leaders were aware of the challenges of provider care to underserved groups, but comprehensive initiatives to address social determinants of health and improve cultural competence were still needed in both system types. The study provides insights into the perceptions and motivations of primary care organizational leaders and providers who are interested in improving chronic care. It also offers an example for care disparity programs to understand commitment and values of the participants for tailoring interventions and setting baseline for progress.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信