{"title":"经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄的可行性。","authors":"Yoshikuni Kobayashi, Masaki Izumo, Kazuaki Okuyama, Nina Uenomachi, Tatsuro Shoji, Takahiko Kai, Taishi Okuno, Yukio Sato, Shingo Kuwata, Masashi Koga, Yuki Ishibashi, Yasuhiro Tanabe, Takeshi Miyairi, Yoshihiro J Akashi","doi":"10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Very severe aortic stenosis (AS) has a poor prognosis even in asymptomatic patients, and asymptomatic very severe AS is a Class IIa indication for aortic valve replacement, although the safety and effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for very severe AS is not well-established. <b><i>Methods and Results:</i></b> This study included 366 patients undergoing TAVI at a single center, with 85 and 281 patients in the very severe AS (peak velocity ≥5 m/s or mean pressure gradient (PG) ≥60 mmHg) and severe AS groups, respectively. Procedural and clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up were compared between groups. The calcium scores were significantly higher in the very severe AS group (2,864.5 vs. 1,405.8 arbitrary units [AU] (P<0.001). Although the patient-prosthesis mismatch rate was higher in the very severe AS group (38.3% vs. 25.7%; P=0.029), there was no significant difference in the early safety and clinical efficacy between the groups (16.5% vs. 17.1% and 12.0% vs. 18.9%, respectively). Similarly, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality at 1 year (4.8% vs. 9.8%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Despite a higher incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch in those with very severe AS, the procedural and clinical outcomes were comparable to those in patients with severe AS. TAVI may be a reasonable treatment option for very severe AS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10276,"journal":{"name":"Circulation Reports","volume":"5 9","pages":"358-364"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/40/b2/circrep-5-358.PMC10483111.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Very Severe Aortic Stenosis.\",\"authors\":\"Yoshikuni Kobayashi, Masaki Izumo, Kazuaki Okuyama, Nina Uenomachi, Tatsuro Shoji, Takahiko Kai, Taishi Okuno, Yukio Sato, Shingo Kuwata, Masashi Koga, Yuki Ishibashi, Yasuhiro Tanabe, Takeshi Miyairi, Yoshihiro J Akashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Very severe aortic stenosis (AS) has a poor prognosis even in asymptomatic patients, and asymptomatic very severe AS is a Class IIa indication for aortic valve replacement, although the safety and effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for very severe AS is not well-established. <b><i>Methods and Results:</i></b> This study included 366 patients undergoing TAVI at a single center, with 85 and 281 patients in the very severe AS (peak velocity ≥5 m/s or mean pressure gradient (PG) ≥60 mmHg) and severe AS groups, respectively. Procedural and clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up were compared between groups. The calcium scores were significantly higher in the very severe AS group (2,864.5 vs. 1,405.8 arbitrary units [AU] (P<0.001). Although the patient-prosthesis mismatch rate was higher in the very severe AS group (38.3% vs. 25.7%; P=0.029), there was no significant difference in the early safety and clinical efficacy between the groups (16.5% vs. 17.1% and 12.0% vs. 18.9%, respectively). Similarly, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality at 1 year (4.8% vs. 9.8%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Despite a higher incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch in those with very severe AS, the procedural and clinical outcomes were comparable to those in patients with severe AS. TAVI may be a reasonable treatment option for very severe AS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation Reports\",\"volume\":\"5 9\",\"pages\":\"358-364\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/40/b2/circrep-5-358.PMC10483111.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:非常严重的主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)即使在无症状的患者中预后也很差,无症状的非常严重的AS是主动脉瓣置换术的IIa类指征,尽管经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)治疗非常严重AS的安全性和有效性尚不明确。方法与结果:本研究纳入366例单中心TAVI患者,其中极重度AS(峰值流速≥5 m/s或平均压力梯度(PG)≥60 mmHg)组85例和重度AS组281例。比较两组1年随访的程序和临床结果。非常严重AS组的钙评分明显更高(2864.5 vs 1405.8任意单位[AU])。结论:尽管非常严重AS患者假体与患者不匹配的发生率更高,但手术和临床结果与严重AS患者相当。TAVI可能是非常严重的AS的合理治疗选择。
Feasibility of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Very Severe Aortic Stenosis.
Background: Very severe aortic stenosis (AS) has a poor prognosis even in asymptomatic patients, and asymptomatic very severe AS is a Class IIa indication for aortic valve replacement, although the safety and effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for very severe AS is not well-established. Methods and Results: This study included 366 patients undergoing TAVI at a single center, with 85 and 281 patients in the very severe AS (peak velocity ≥5 m/s or mean pressure gradient (PG) ≥60 mmHg) and severe AS groups, respectively. Procedural and clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up were compared between groups. The calcium scores were significantly higher in the very severe AS group (2,864.5 vs. 1,405.8 arbitrary units [AU] (P<0.001). Although the patient-prosthesis mismatch rate was higher in the very severe AS group (38.3% vs. 25.7%; P=0.029), there was no significant difference in the early safety and clinical efficacy between the groups (16.5% vs. 17.1% and 12.0% vs. 18.9%, respectively). Similarly, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality at 1 year (4.8% vs. 9.8%). Conclusions: Despite a higher incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch in those with very severe AS, the procedural and clinical outcomes were comparable to those in patients with severe AS. TAVI may be a reasonable treatment option for very severe AS.