骨科学生的认知移情:一项纵向研究,与骨科医学教育和移情项目(POMEE)的数据进行比较。

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1515/jom-2023-0014
Bruce W Newton, Zachary T Vaskalis
{"title":"骨科学生的认知移情:一项纵向研究,与骨科医学教育和移情项目(POMEE)的数据进行比较。","authors":"Bruce W Newton, Zachary T Vaskalis","doi":"10.1515/jom-2023-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Establishing an empathic bond of trust with patients is a characteristic that physicians need, because patients feel that physicians are more caring if they sense that they are empathetic. Former cross-sectional studies have shown an erosion of cognitive empathy as medical students progress through their education.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to measure the changes in student cognitive empathy as they progress through their undergraduate osteopathic medical education. Cognitive empathy scores are compared to the nationwide norms established by the Project in Osteopathic Medical Education and Empathy (POMEE) study by Mohammadreza Hojat, PhD, and colleagues.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During orientation to medical school, and at the beginning of each subsequent academic year, and just before graduation, the graduating classes of 2017-2019 participated in this longitudinal study by filling out the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Student Version (JSE-S). A total of 345/459 Osteopathic Medical Student (OMS) I-IV students (75.2 % of the graduates) filled out the forms for all five time points. Desired specialty choice and sex were also collected. Specialty choice was divided into Core and Non-Core groups. Core specialties are \"people-oriented\" and have a large amount of patient contact and continuity of care, while Non-Core specialties are \"technical- or procedure-oriented\" and have little or no patient contact and/or continuity of care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Men selecting Non-Core specialties had significant drops in JSE-S scores (p=0.001); whereas men who selected the Core specialties did not have a significant decrease. For women, there was no significant drop in JSE-S scores for those selecting either Core or Non-Core specialties. When compared to POMEE norm data, none of the Campbell University School of Medicine students had JSE-S scores that were above the 50th percentile.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Students selecting Core specialties do a better job of maintaining their cognitive empathy, which aids their ability to establish an empathic bond of trust with patients, when compared to students who desire Non-Core specialties. JSE-S scores not above the POMEE 50th percentile is concerning and indicate either a curricular change to better enhance empathic communication skills and/or better applicant selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"13-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive empathy of osteopathic students: a longitudinal study with data comparisons to the Project in Osteopathic Medical Education and Empathy (POMEE).\",\"authors\":\"Bruce W Newton, Zachary T Vaskalis\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jom-2023-0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Establishing an empathic bond of trust with patients is a characteristic that physicians need, because patients feel that physicians are more caring if they sense that they are empathetic. Former cross-sectional studies have shown an erosion of cognitive empathy as medical students progress through their education.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to measure the changes in student cognitive empathy as they progress through their undergraduate osteopathic medical education. Cognitive empathy scores are compared to the nationwide norms established by the Project in Osteopathic Medical Education and Empathy (POMEE) study by Mohammadreza Hojat, PhD, and colleagues.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During orientation to medical school, and at the beginning of each subsequent academic year, and just before graduation, the graduating classes of 2017-2019 participated in this longitudinal study by filling out the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Student Version (JSE-S). A total of 345/459 Osteopathic Medical Student (OMS) I-IV students (75.2 % of the graduates) filled out the forms for all five time points. Desired specialty choice and sex were also collected. Specialty choice was divided into Core and Non-Core groups. Core specialties are \\\"people-oriented\\\" and have a large amount of patient contact and continuity of care, while Non-Core specialties are \\\"technical- or procedure-oriented\\\" and have little or no patient contact and/or continuity of care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Men selecting Non-Core specialties had significant drops in JSE-S scores (p=0.001); whereas men who selected the Core specialties did not have a significant decrease. For women, there was no significant drop in JSE-S scores for those selecting either Core or Non-Core specialties. When compared to POMEE norm data, none of the Campbell University School of Medicine students had JSE-S scores that were above the 50th percentile.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Students selecting Core specialties do a better job of maintaining their cognitive empathy, which aids their ability to establish an empathic bond of trust with patients, when compared to students who desire Non-Core specialties. JSE-S scores not above the POMEE 50th percentile is concerning and indicate either a curricular change to better enhance empathic communication skills and/or better applicant selection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2023-0014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2023-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与患者建立移情信任纽带是医生需要具备的一个特征,因为患者认为,如果医生能让他们感受到移情,他们就会更加关心患者。以往的横断面研究表明,随着医学生接受教育的不断深入,他们的认知移情能力会受到削弱:本研究旨在测量学生在接受骨科医学本科教育过程中认知移情能力的变化。将认知移情得分与 Mohammadreza Hojat 博士及其同事开展的骨科医学教育与移情项目(POMEE)研究确定的全国标准进行比较:在医学院新生入学时、随后每个学年开始时以及毕业前夕,2017-2019届毕业班学生通过填写杰斐逊移情量表-学生版(JSE-S)参与了这项纵向研究。共有 345/459 名骨科医学生(OMS)一至四年级学生(占毕业生的 75.2%)填写了所有五个时间点的表格。此外,还收集了学生的专业选择和性别。专业选择分为核心组和非核心组。核心专业是 "以人为本 "的专业,与病人有大量接触并能提供连续性的医疗服务;而非核心专业则是 "以技术或程序为本 "的专业,与病人接触很少或根本没有,也没有连续性的医疗服务:选择非核心专业的男性的 JSE-S 分数显著下降(p=0.001);而选择核心专业的男性的 JSE-S 分数没有显著下降。对于女性而言,无论是选择核心专科还是非核心专科,其 JSE-S 分数都没有明显下降。与 POMEE 常模数据相比,坎贝尔大学医学院学生的 JSE-S 分数均未超过第 50 百分位数:结论:与选择非核心专业的学生相比,选择核心专业的学生在保持认知移情方面做得更好,这有助于他们与病人建立移情信任纽带。JSE-S分数不超过POMEE第50百分位数是令人担忧的,这表明需要改变课程以更好地提高移情沟通技能和/或更好地选择申请人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive empathy of osteopathic students: a longitudinal study with data comparisons to the Project in Osteopathic Medical Education and Empathy (POMEE).

Context: Establishing an empathic bond of trust with patients is a characteristic that physicians need, because patients feel that physicians are more caring if they sense that they are empathetic. Former cross-sectional studies have shown an erosion of cognitive empathy as medical students progress through their education.

Objectives: This study aims to measure the changes in student cognitive empathy as they progress through their undergraduate osteopathic medical education. Cognitive empathy scores are compared to the nationwide norms established by the Project in Osteopathic Medical Education and Empathy (POMEE) study by Mohammadreza Hojat, PhD, and colleagues.

Methods: During orientation to medical school, and at the beginning of each subsequent academic year, and just before graduation, the graduating classes of 2017-2019 participated in this longitudinal study by filling out the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Student Version (JSE-S). A total of 345/459 Osteopathic Medical Student (OMS) I-IV students (75.2 % of the graduates) filled out the forms for all five time points. Desired specialty choice and sex were also collected. Specialty choice was divided into Core and Non-Core groups. Core specialties are "people-oriented" and have a large amount of patient contact and continuity of care, while Non-Core specialties are "technical- or procedure-oriented" and have little or no patient contact and/or continuity of care.

Results: Men selecting Non-Core specialties had significant drops in JSE-S scores (p=0.001); whereas men who selected the Core specialties did not have a significant decrease. For women, there was no significant drop in JSE-S scores for those selecting either Core or Non-Core specialties. When compared to POMEE norm data, none of the Campbell University School of Medicine students had JSE-S scores that were above the 50th percentile.

Conclusions: Students selecting Core specialties do a better job of maintaining their cognitive empathy, which aids their ability to establish an empathic bond of trust with patients, when compared to students who desire Non-Core specialties. JSE-S scores not above the POMEE 50th percentile is concerning and indicate either a curricular change to better enhance empathic communication skills and/or better applicant selection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Health Professions-Complementary and Manual Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
118
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信