离心等离子体吸附低密度脂蛋白可缩短处理时间。

IF 0.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Atsushi Ohkubo, Takatoshi Sakurasawa, Shotaro Naito
{"title":"离心等离子体吸附低密度脂蛋白可缩短处理时间。","authors":"Atsushi Ohkubo,&nbsp;Takatoshi Sakurasawa,&nbsp;Shotaro Naito","doi":"10.1159/000531097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis is effective for nephrotic syndrome in drug-resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). Dextran sulfate adsorption of LDL (DSAL) is widely used for this purpose. The Liposorber LA-15 system performs DSAL by membrane plasma separation (mDSAL) using an MA-03 plasma purification device. However, sufficient blood flow (Qb) frequently cannot be obtained from a peripheral vein with mDSAL. The recommended plasma filtration flow rate (Qf) when using the OP-05W membrane plasma separator is no more than 1/3 of Qb, giving plasma removal efficiency (PRE) of about 30%. In contrast, the centrifugal blood component separator Spectra Optia has PRE of 87-92.5% because centrifugal separation enables effective separation of plasma components even at low Qb. Here, we present the case of a man in his 40s with FSGS, for whom we began treatment with mDSAL with the intention of completing a 12-session cycle, but extended treatment times were required due to low Qb. Therefore, we switched to DSAL by centrifugation (cDSAL) using the Liposorber LA-40 system from the 6th session onward. Treatment time decreased from 190 min for the fifth session using mDSAL to 140 min for the sixth session using cDSAL. Mean treatment time also decreased from 155 ± 9 min for mDSAL (5 sessions) to 119 ± 20 min for cDSAL (7 sessions). Moreover, the LDL removal rate at a processed plasma volume was similar for both modalities. In conclusion, cDSAL can enable efficient plasma separation even with low Qb, with a comparable LDL removal rate and shorter treatment time relative to mDSAL.</p>","PeriodicalId":9599,"journal":{"name":"Case Reports in Nephrology and Dialysis","volume":"13 1","pages":"51-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8e/73/cnd-2023-0013-0001-531097.PMC10359670.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-Density Lipoprotein Adsorption by Centrifugal Plasma Separation Can Shorten Treatment Time.\",\"authors\":\"Atsushi Ohkubo,&nbsp;Takatoshi Sakurasawa,&nbsp;Shotaro Naito\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000531097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis is effective for nephrotic syndrome in drug-resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). Dextran sulfate adsorption of LDL (DSAL) is widely used for this purpose. The Liposorber LA-15 system performs DSAL by membrane plasma separation (mDSAL) using an MA-03 plasma purification device. However, sufficient blood flow (Qb) frequently cannot be obtained from a peripheral vein with mDSAL. The recommended plasma filtration flow rate (Qf) when using the OP-05W membrane plasma separator is no more than 1/3 of Qb, giving plasma removal efficiency (PRE) of about 30%. In contrast, the centrifugal blood component separator Spectra Optia has PRE of 87-92.5% because centrifugal separation enables effective separation of plasma components even at low Qb. Here, we present the case of a man in his 40s with FSGS, for whom we began treatment with mDSAL with the intention of completing a 12-session cycle, but extended treatment times were required due to low Qb. Therefore, we switched to DSAL by centrifugation (cDSAL) using the Liposorber LA-40 system from the 6th session onward. Treatment time decreased from 190 min for the fifth session using mDSAL to 140 min for the sixth session using cDSAL. Mean treatment time also decreased from 155 ± 9 min for mDSAL (5 sessions) to 119 ± 20 min for cDSAL (7 sessions). Moreover, the LDL removal rate at a processed plasma volume was similar for both modalities. In conclusion, cDSAL can enable efficient plasma separation even with low Qb, with a comparable LDL removal rate and shorter treatment time relative to mDSAL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Reports in Nephrology and Dialysis\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"51-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8e/73/cnd-2023-0013-0001-531097.PMC10359670.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Reports in Nephrology and Dialysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000531097\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Reports in Nephrology and Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000531097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

低密度脂蛋白(LDL)采珠术治疗耐药局灶节段性肾小球硬化(FSGS)肾病综合征是有效的。硫酸葡聚糖吸附低密度脂蛋白(DSAL)被广泛用于此目的。Liposorber LA-15系统使用MA-03等离子体净化装置通过膜等离子体分离(mDSAL)进行DSAL。然而,mDSAL患者通常不能从外周静脉获得足够的血流(Qb)。使用OP-05W膜等离子体分离器时,推荐的等离子体过滤流量(Qf)不大于Qb的1/3,等离子体去除效率(PRE)约为30%。相比之下,离心式血液成分分离器Spectra Optia的PRE为87-92.5%,因为离心式分离即使在低Qb下也能有效分离血浆成分。在这里,我们报告了一个40多岁患有FSGS的男性病例,我们开始用mDSAL治疗,打算完成12个疗程的周期,但由于低Qb需要延长治疗时间。因此,从第6次会议开始,我们使用Liposorber LA-40系统切换到DSAL通过离心(cDSAL)。治疗时间从第五次使用mDSAL的190分钟减少到第六次使用cDSAL的140分钟。平均治疗时间也从mDSAL的155±9分钟(5个疗程)减少到cDSAL的119±20分钟(7个疗程)。此外,在处理过的血浆体积下,两种方式的LDL去除率相似。综上所述,cDSAL即使在低Qb条件下也能实现高效的血浆分离,与mDSAL相比,cDSAL具有相当的LDL去除率和更短的处理时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Low-Density Lipoprotein Adsorption by Centrifugal Plasma Separation Can Shorten Treatment Time.

Low-Density Lipoprotein Adsorption by Centrifugal Plasma Separation Can Shorten Treatment Time.

Low-Density Lipoprotein Adsorption by Centrifugal Plasma Separation Can Shorten Treatment Time.

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis is effective for nephrotic syndrome in drug-resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). Dextran sulfate adsorption of LDL (DSAL) is widely used for this purpose. The Liposorber LA-15 system performs DSAL by membrane plasma separation (mDSAL) using an MA-03 plasma purification device. However, sufficient blood flow (Qb) frequently cannot be obtained from a peripheral vein with mDSAL. The recommended plasma filtration flow rate (Qf) when using the OP-05W membrane plasma separator is no more than 1/3 of Qb, giving plasma removal efficiency (PRE) of about 30%. In contrast, the centrifugal blood component separator Spectra Optia has PRE of 87-92.5% because centrifugal separation enables effective separation of plasma components even at low Qb. Here, we present the case of a man in his 40s with FSGS, for whom we began treatment with mDSAL with the intention of completing a 12-session cycle, but extended treatment times were required due to low Qb. Therefore, we switched to DSAL by centrifugation (cDSAL) using the Liposorber LA-40 system from the 6th session onward. Treatment time decreased from 190 min for the fifth session using mDSAL to 140 min for the sixth session using cDSAL. Mean treatment time also decreased from 155 ± 9 min for mDSAL (5 sessions) to 119 ± 20 min for cDSAL (7 sessions). Moreover, the LDL removal rate at a processed plasma volume was similar for both modalities. In conclusion, cDSAL can enable efficient plasma separation even with low Qb, with a comparable LDL removal rate and shorter treatment time relative to mDSAL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed online-only journal publishes original case reports covering the entire spectrum of nephrology and dialysis, including genetic susceptibility, clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment or prevention, toxicities of therapy, critical care, supportive care, quality-of-life and survival issues. The journal will also accept case reports dealing with the use of novel technologies, both in the arena of diagnosis and treatment. Supplementary material is welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信