不同尖端位置的股骨隧道式袖带血液透析导管的临床疗效:单中心回顾性研究。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Vascular Access Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-12 DOI:10.1177/11297298231195543
Sudan Wu, Lifeng Zhang, Qiqi Wang, Haijun Wei, Siwei Zheng, Dan Huang, Jie Ni, Yang Liu
{"title":"不同尖端位置的股骨隧道式袖带血液透析导管的临床疗效:单中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Sudan Wu, Lifeng Zhang, Qiqi Wang, Haijun Wei, Siwei Zheng, Dan Huang, Jie Ni, Yang Liu","doi":"10.1177/11297298231195543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tunneled-cuffed catheter (TCC) reaching the mid-atrium has been demonstrated to be associated with improved catheter survival. However, whether similar conclusions can be made for femoral TCC reaching the inferior vena cava (IVC) remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 47 patients with end-stage renal disease receiving right femoral TCC were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The primary patency, catheter dysfunction, and TCC-associated infection rate were compared between patients with TCC tip at the IVC and those with TCC tip at non-IVC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TCC tips were located at the IVC in 26 patients and non-IVC in 21 patients. The technical success rates for both groups were 100%. The primary patency of the former group were significantly higher than those of the latter group at 3 months (92.3% vs 61.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.011), 6 months (80.8% vs 52.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.017), and 12 months (50.0% vs 28.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.024) follow-up, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis demonstrated significantly different catheter dysfunction-free survival between the two groups (log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.017). The overall TCC-associated infection rate was similar between the two groups (7.7% vs 9.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Femoral TCC with tips at IVC was associated with higher primary patency, lower catheter dysfunction but similar TCC-associated infection rate as compared with those at non-IVC.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcomes for femoral tunneled-cuffed hemodialysis catheters with different tip positions: A single-center retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Sudan Wu, Lifeng Zhang, Qiqi Wang, Haijun Wei, Siwei Zheng, Dan Huang, Jie Ni, Yang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11297298231195543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tunneled-cuffed catheter (TCC) reaching the mid-atrium has been demonstrated to be associated with improved catheter survival. However, whether similar conclusions can be made for femoral TCC reaching the inferior vena cava (IVC) remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 47 patients with end-stage renal disease receiving right femoral TCC were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The primary patency, catheter dysfunction, and TCC-associated infection rate were compared between patients with TCC tip at the IVC and those with TCC tip at non-IVC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TCC tips were located at the IVC in 26 patients and non-IVC in 21 patients. The technical success rates for both groups were 100%. The primary patency of the former group were significantly higher than those of the latter group at 3 months (92.3% vs 61.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.011), 6 months (80.8% vs 52.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.017), and 12 months (50.0% vs 28.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.024) follow-up, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis demonstrated significantly different catheter dysfunction-free survival between the two groups (log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.017). The overall TCC-associated infection rate was similar between the two groups (7.7% vs 9.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Femoral TCC with tips at IVC was associated with higher primary patency, lower catheter dysfunction but similar TCC-associated infection rate as compared with those at non-IVC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298231195543\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298231195543","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:已证实到达中心房的隧道袖带导管(TCC)与导管存活率的提高有关。然而,对于到达下腔静脉(IVC)的股动脉 TCC 是否也能得出类似结论,目前仍不得而知:回顾性收集并分析了 47 名接受右股 TCC 的终末期肾病患者的数据。结果:TCC尖端位于IVC的患者与TCC尖端位于非IVC的患者的主要通畅率、导管功能障碍和TCC相关感染率进行了比较:结果:26 名患者的 TCC 尖端位于 IVC,21 名患者的 TCC 尖端位于非 IVC。两组的技术成功率均为 100%。随访 3 个月(92.3% vs 61.9%,P = 0.011)、6 个月(80.8% vs 52.4%,P = 0.017)和 12 个月(50.0% vs 28.5%,P = 0.024)时,前一组的主要通畅率明显高于后一组。卡普兰-梅耶曲线分析表明,两组患者的导管无功能障碍存活率明显不同(log-rank p = 0.017)。两组的总体 TCC 相关感染率相似(7.7% vs 9.5%,p = 0.82):结论:尖端位于 IVC 的股骨 TCC 与位于非 IVC 的 TCC 相比,主要通畅率更高,导管功能障碍更低,但 TCC 相关感染率相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical outcomes for femoral tunneled-cuffed hemodialysis catheters with different tip positions: A single-center retrospective study.

Background: Tunneled-cuffed catheter (TCC) reaching the mid-atrium has been demonstrated to be associated with improved catheter survival. However, whether similar conclusions can be made for femoral TCC reaching the inferior vena cava (IVC) remains unknown.

Methods: Data from 47 patients with end-stage renal disease receiving right femoral TCC were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The primary patency, catheter dysfunction, and TCC-associated infection rate were compared between patients with TCC tip at the IVC and those with TCC tip at non-IVC.

Results: TCC tips were located at the IVC in 26 patients and non-IVC in 21 patients. The technical success rates for both groups were 100%. The primary patency of the former group were significantly higher than those of the latter group at 3 months (92.3% vs 61.9%, p = 0.011), 6 months (80.8% vs 52.4%, p = 0.017), and 12 months (50.0% vs 28.5%, p = 0.024) follow-up, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis demonstrated significantly different catheter dysfunction-free survival between the two groups (log-rank p = 0.017). The overall TCC-associated infection rate was similar between the two groups (7.7% vs 9.5%, p = 0.82).

Conclusion: Femoral TCC with tips at IVC was associated with higher primary patency, lower catheter dysfunction but similar TCC-associated infection rate as compared with those at non-IVC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信