无止血带骨水泥全膝关节置换术不会增加无菌松脱的风险。

Michael Merz, Anil Thomas, Carl Talmo, Sumon Nandi
{"title":"无止血带骨水泥全膝关节置换术不会增加无菌松脱的风险。","authors":"Michael Merz,&nbsp;Anil Thomas,&nbsp;Carl Talmo,&nbsp;Sumon Nandi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our study examined whether risk of revision for aseptic loosening following cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is (1) increased with tourniquetless surgery and (2) affected by patient characteristics or surgical factors. Primary cemented TKAs from 2005-2012 with 2-year follow up were analyzed (n = 5,508 with tourniquet; n=101 without). Revision for aseptic loosening was compared between TKA performed with and without a tourniquet. Patient characteristics were recorded. At mean 4.8-year follow up, risk of aseptic loosening was similar between TKA performed with or without a tourniquet (p = 0.3151). Aseptic loosening was more likely in men (p = 0.0018) and patients younger than 50 (p < 0.0001). No difference was observed between cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized implants (p = 0.1250). With the numbers available for study, we did not observe an increased risk of aseptic loosening with tourniquetless cemented primary TKA. Patients younger than 50, particularly men, should be counselled on the increased risk of TKA revision for aseptic loosening. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 32(2):111-113, 2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":17143,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","volume":"32 2","pages":"111-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No Increased Risk of Aseptic Loosening with Tourniquetless Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Merz,&nbsp;Anil Thomas,&nbsp;Carl Talmo,&nbsp;Sumon Nandi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Our study examined whether risk of revision for aseptic loosening following cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is (1) increased with tourniquetless surgery and (2) affected by patient characteristics or surgical factors. Primary cemented TKAs from 2005-2012 with 2-year follow up were analyzed (n = 5,508 with tourniquet; n=101 without). Revision for aseptic loosening was compared between TKA performed with and without a tourniquet. Patient characteristics were recorded. At mean 4.8-year follow up, risk of aseptic loosening was similar between TKA performed with or without a tourniquet (p = 0.3151). Aseptic loosening was more likely in men (p = 0.0018) and patients younger than 50 (p < 0.0001). No difference was observed between cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized implants (p = 0.1250). With the numbers available for study, we did not observe an increased risk of aseptic loosening with tourniquetless cemented primary TKA. Patients younger than 50, particularly men, should be counselled on the increased risk of TKA revision for aseptic loosening. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 32(2):111-113, 2023).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances\",\"volume\":\"32 2\",\"pages\":\"111-113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的研究检查了骨水泥型全膝关节置换术(TKA)后无菌性松动翻修的风险是否(1)无止血带手术增加,(2)受患者特征或手术因素影响。分析了2005-2012年的原发性骨水泥TKA,并进行了2年的随访(n=5508例使用止血带;n=101例未使用)。比较使用止血带和不使用止血血带进行TKA的无菌性松动翻修术。记录患者特征。在平均4.8年的随访中,使用或不使用止血带进行TKA的无菌性松动风险相似(p=0.3151)。男性(p=0.0018)和50岁以下的患者更有可能发生无菌性松动(p<0.0001)。交叉韧带保留和后稳定植入物之间没有观察到差异(p=0.1250)。根据可供研究的数字,我们没有观察到使用无止血带胶结的初次TKA会增加无菌性松动的风险。50岁以下的患者,尤其是男性,应就无菌性松动TKA翻修的风险增加进行咨询。(《外科骨科进展杂志》32(2):111-1132023)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
No Increased Risk of Aseptic Loosening with Tourniquetless Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Our study examined whether risk of revision for aseptic loosening following cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is (1) increased with tourniquetless surgery and (2) affected by patient characteristics or surgical factors. Primary cemented TKAs from 2005-2012 with 2-year follow up were analyzed (n = 5,508 with tourniquet; n=101 without). Revision for aseptic loosening was compared between TKA performed with and without a tourniquet. Patient characteristics were recorded. At mean 4.8-year follow up, risk of aseptic loosening was similar between TKA performed with or without a tourniquet (p = 0.3151). Aseptic loosening was more likely in men (p = 0.0018) and patients younger than 50 (p < 0.0001). No difference was observed between cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized implants (p = 0.1250). With the numbers available for study, we did not observe an increased risk of aseptic loosening with tourniquetless cemented primary TKA. Patients younger than 50, particularly men, should be counselled on the increased risk of TKA revision for aseptic loosening. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 32(2):111-113, 2023).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信