绿色和黑色毒蛙(Dendrobates auratus)通过环境几何和特征线索确定方向。

IF 1.9 2区 生物学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Cody A. Sorrell, Sabrina S. Burmeister
{"title":"绿色和黑色毒蛙(Dendrobates auratus)通过环境几何和特征线索确定方向。","authors":"Cody A. Sorrell,&nbsp;Sabrina S. Burmeister","doi":"10.1007/s10071-023-01820-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The ability to use environmental geometry when orienting in space reflects an animal’s ability to use a global, allocentric framework. Therefore, understanding when and how animal’s use geometry relative to other types of cues in the environment has interested comparative cognition researchers for decades. Yet, only two amphibians have been tested to date. We trained the poison frog <i>Dendrobates auratus</i> to find goal shelters in a rectangular arena, in the presence and absence of a feature cue, and assessed the relative influence of the two types of cues using probe trials. We chose <i>D. auratus</i> because the species has complex interactions with their physical and social environments, including parental care that requires navigating to and from distant locations. We found that, like many vertebrates, <i>D. auratus</i> are capable of using geometric information to relocate goals. In addition, the frogs preferentially used the more reliable feature cue when the location of the feature conflicted with the geometry of the arena. The frogs were equally successful at using the feature cue when it was proximal or distal to the goal shelter, consistent with prior studies that found that <i>D. auratus</i> can use distal cues in a flexible manner. Our results provide further evidence that amphibians can use environmental geometry during orientation. Future studies that examine when and how amphibians use geometry relative to other types of cues will contribute to a more complete picture of spatial cognition in this important, yet understudied, group.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7879,"journal":{"name":"Animal Cognition","volume":"26 6","pages":"2023 - 2030"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Orientation by environmental geometry and feature cues in the green and black poison frog (Dendrobates auratus)\",\"authors\":\"Cody A. Sorrell,&nbsp;Sabrina S. Burmeister\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10071-023-01820-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The ability to use environmental geometry when orienting in space reflects an animal’s ability to use a global, allocentric framework. Therefore, understanding when and how animal’s use geometry relative to other types of cues in the environment has interested comparative cognition researchers for decades. Yet, only two amphibians have been tested to date. We trained the poison frog <i>Dendrobates auratus</i> to find goal shelters in a rectangular arena, in the presence and absence of a feature cue, and assessed the relative influence of the two types of cues using probe trials. We chose <i>D. auratus</i> because the species has complex interactions with their physical and social environments, including parental care that requires navigating to and from distant locations. We found that, like many vertebrates, <i>D. auratus</i> are capable of using geometric information to relocate goals. In addition, the frogs preferentially used the more reliable feature cue when the location of the feature conflicted with the geometry of the arena. The frogs were equally successful at using the feature cue when it was proximal or distal to the goal shelter, consistent with prior studies that found that <i>D. auratus</i> can use distal cues in a flexible manner. Our results provide further evidence that amphibians can use environmental geometry during orientation. Future studies that examine when and how amphibians use geometry relative to other types of cues will contribute to a more complete picture of spatial cognition in this important, yet understudied, group.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Cognition\",\"volume\":\"26 6\",\"pages\":\"2023 - 2030\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10071-023-01820-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10071-023-01820-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在确定空间方向时使用环境几何图形的能力反映了动物使用全球分配中心框架的能力。因此,数十年来,比较认知研究人员一直对了解动物在何时以及如何使用几何图形与环境中的其他类型线索进行比较感兴趣。然而,迄今为止只有两种两栖动物接受过测试。我们训练毒蛙在有和没有特征线索的情况下在矩形场地中寻找目标避难所,并通过探究试验评估两种线索的相对影响。我们之所以选择无尾椎蛙,是因为该物种与它们的物理和社会环境有着复杂的相互作用,包括需要往返于遥远地点的父母照顾。我们发现,和许多脊椎动物一样,金蛙能够利用几何信息来重新定位目标。此外,当特征的位置与竞技场的几何形状发生冲突时,蛙类会优先使用更可靠的特征线索。当特征线索位于目标掩蔽物的近端或远端时,蛙类使用特征线索的成功率相同,这与之前的研究结果一致,这些研究发现蛙类可以灵活地使用远端线索。我们的研究结果进一步证明,两栖动物在定向过程中可以利用环境的几何特征。未来的研究将考察两栖动物在何时以及如何使用几何图形而不是其他类型的线索,这将有助于更全面地了解这一重要但研究不足的类群的空间认知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Orientation by environmental geometry and feature cues in the green and black poison frog (Dendrobates auratus)

Orientation by environmental geometry and feature cues in the green and black poison frog (Dendrobates auratus)

Orientation by environmental geometry and feature cues in the green and black poison frog (Dendrobates auratus)

The ability to use environmental geometry when orienting in space reflects an animal’s ability to use a global, allocentric framework. Therefore, understanding when and how animal’s use geometry relative to other types of cues in the environment has interested comparative cognition researchers for decades. Yet, only two amphibians have been tested to date. We trained the poison frog Dendrobates auratus to find goal shelters in a rectangular arena, in the presence and absence of a feature cue, and assessed the relative influence of the two types of cues using probe trials. We chose D. auratus because the species has complex interactions with their physical and social environments, including parental care that requires navigating to and from distant locations. We found that, like many vertebrates, D. auratus are capable of using geometric information to relocate goals. In addition, the frogs preferentially used the more reliable feature cue when the location of the feature conflicted with the geometry of the arena. The frogs were equally successful at using the feature cue when it was proximal or distal to the goal shelter, consistent with prior studies that found that D. auratus can use distal cues in a flexible manner. Our results provide further evidence that amphibians can use environmental geometry during orientation. Future studies that examine when and how amphibians use geometry relative to other types of cues will contribute to a more complete picture of spatial cognition in this important, yet understudied, group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Cognition
Animal Cognition 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
18.50%
发文量
125
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Animal Cognition is an interdisciplinary journal offering current research from many disciplines (ethology, behavioral ecology, animal behavior and learning, cognitive sciences, comparative psychology and evolutionary psychology) on all aspects of animal (and human) cognition in an evolutionary framework. Animal Cognition publishes original empirical and theoretical work, reviews, methods papers, short communications and correspondence on the mechanisms and evolution of biologically rooted cognitive-intellectual structures. The journal explores animal time perception and use; causality detection; innate reaction patterns and innate bases of learning; numerical competence and frequency expectancies; symbol use; communication; problem solving, animal thinking and use of tools, and the modularity of the mind.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信