颞筋膜和真皮脂肪移植治疗颞下颌关节强直的比较评价。

National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2023-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-13 DOI:10.4103/njms.njms_452_21
Abdus Sami, Ghulam Sarwar Hashmi, Sajjad Abdur Rahman, Tabishur Rahman, Md Kalim Ansari
{"title":"颞筋膜和真皮脂肪移植治疗颞下颌关节强直的比较评价。","authors":"Abdus Sami,&nbsp;Ghulam Sarwar Hashmi,&nbsp;Sajjad Abdur Rahman,&nbsp;Tabishur Rahman,&nbsp;Md Kalim Ansari","doi":"10.4103/njms.njms_452_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis is a debilitating condition usually afflicting children and young adults, causing long-term functional, aesthetic, and severe psychological impacts on the lives of these patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the postoperative outcomes after using one of the most commonly employed inter-positional graft, i.e., temporalis fascia, and a recently introduced 'more suitable' graft, i.e., dermal fat.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study in which 20 patients of TMJ ankylosis were randomly assigned into two groups of 10 patients each. Temporalis fascia was used as an inter-positional graft in one group, while dermal fat graft was used in the other group. Post-surgical clinical parameters were evaluated, including interincisal mouth-opening and pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interincisal mouth opening at six months was greater in group A (32.1 ± 12.93) as compared to group B (33.8 ± 4.89), but statistically, it was not significant (<i>P</i> = 0.478). The mean pain score in group A was 4.60 ± 1.17, 1.50 ± 0.70, 0.20 ± 0.42 on day 1, 7, and 15, respectively. The mean pain score in group B was 4.10 ± 0.99, 1.30 ± 0.48, 0.20 ± 0.42 on day 1, 7, and 15, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both the graft materials work well in terms of maximum interincisal opening. For more clarification, a larger sample size with a longer duration of follow-up is needed to validate the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":18827,"journal":{"name":"National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"14 2","pages":"277-281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/57/bd/NJMS-14-277.PMC10474538.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of temporal fascia and dermal fat graft in the management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis.\",\"authors\":\"Abdus Sami,&nbsp;Ghulam Sarwar Hashmi,&nbsp;Sajjad Abdur Rahman,&nbsp;Tabishur Rahman,&nbsp;Md Kalim Ansari\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/njms.njms_452_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis is a debilitating condition usually afflicting children and young adults, causing long-term functional, aesthetic, and severe psychological impacts on the lives of these patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the postoperative outcomes after using one of the most commonly employed inter-positional graft, i.e., temporalis fascia, and a recently introduced 'more suitable' graft, i.e., dermal fat.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study in which 20 patients of TMJ ankylosis were randomly assigned into two groups of 10 patients each. Temporalis fascia was used as an inter-positional graft in one group, while dermal fat graft was used in the other group. Post-surgical clinical parameters were evaluated, including interincisal mouth-opening and pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interincisal mouth opening at six months was greater in group A (32.1 ± 12.93) as compared to group B (33.8 ± 4.89), but statistically, it was not significant (<i>P</i> = 0.478). The mean pain score in group A was 4.60 ± 1.17, 1.50 ± 0.70, 0.20 ± 0.42 on day 1, 7, and 15, respectively. The mean pain score in group B was 4.10 ± 0.99, 1.30 ± 0.48, 0.20 ± 0.42 on day 1, 7, and 15, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both the graft materials work well in terms of maximum interincisal opening. For more clarification, a larger sample size with a longer duration of follow-up is needed to validate the study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"277-281\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/57/bd/NJMS-14-277.PMC10474538.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_452_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_452_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:颞下颌关节强直是一种使人衰弱的疾病,通常困扰儿童和年轻人,对这些患者的生活造成长期的功能、美学和严重的心理影响。目的:比较使用最常用的位置间移植物之一(即颞筋膜)和最近引入的“更合适”的移植物(即真皮脂肪)后的术后结果。方法:前瞻性研究将20例颞下颌关节强直患者随机分为两组,每组10例。其中一组采用颞筋膜作为位置间移植物,另一组采用真皮脂肪移植物。评估术后临床参数,包括术后口腔张开和疼痛。结果:与B组(33.8±4.89)相比,A组(32.1±12.93)在6个月时切口间张开较大,但无统计学意义(P=0.478)。A组在第1天、第7天和第15天的平均疼痛评分分别为4.60±1.17、1.50±0.70、0.20±0.42。B组在第1天、第7天和第15天的平均疼痛评分分别为4.10±0.99、1.30±0.48、0.20±0.42。结论:两种移植物材料都能很好地实现最大的牙周间隙。为了进一步澄清,需要更大的样本量和更长的随访时间来验证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative evaluation of temporal fascia and dermal fat graft in the management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis.

Comparative evaluation of temporal fascia and dermal fat graft in the management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis.

Comparative evaluation of temporal fascia and dermal fat graft in the management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis.

Comparative evaluation of temporal fascia and dermal fat graft in the management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis.

Introduction: Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis is a debilitating condition usually afflicting children and young adults, causing long-term functional, aesthetic, and severe psychological impacts on the lives of these patients.

Objective: To compare the postoperative outcomes after using one of the most commonly employed inter-positional graft, i.e., temporalis fascia, and a recently introduced 'more suitable' graft, i.e., dermal fat.

Methods: A prospective study in which 20 patients of TMJ ankylosis were randomly assigned into two groups of 10 patients each. Temporalis fascia was used as an inter-positional graft in one group, while dermal fat graft was used in the other group. Post-surgical clinical parameters were evaluated, including interincisal mouth-opening and pain.

Results: Interincisal mouth opening at six months was greater in group A (32.1 ± 12.93) as compared to group B (33.8 ± 4.89), but statistically, it was not significant (P = 0.478). The mean pain score in group A was 4.60 ± 1.17, 1.50 ± 0.70, 0.20 ± 0.42 on day 1, 7, and 15, respectively. The mean pain score in group B was 4.10 ± 0.99, 1.30 ± 0.48, 0.20 ± 0.42 on day 1, 7, and 15, respectively.

Conclusion: Both the graft materials work well in terms of maximum interincisal opening. For more clarification, a larger sample size with a longer duration of follow-up is needed to validate the study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信