中风后口面部功能障碍--多学科方法。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Gerodontology Pub Date : 2023-09-11 DOI:10.1111/ger.12713
Pia Skott, Elisabet Åkesson, Kerstin Johansson, Jesper Dalum, Emmelie Persson, Åsa Karlsson, Åke Seiger, Anita McAllister, Gunilla Sandborgh-Englund
{"title":"中风后口面部功能障碍--多学科方法。","authors":"Pia Skott,&nbsp;Elisabet Åkesson,&nbsp;Kerstin Johansson,&nbsp;Jesper Dalum,&nbsp;Emmelie Persson,&nbsp;Åsa Karlsson,&nbsp;Åke Seiger,&nbsp;Anita McAllister,&nbsp;Gunilla Sandborgh-Englund","doi":"10.1111/ger.12713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This paper describes the study protocol in an ongoing clinical trial evaluating oral screen training as part of a post-stroke rehabilitation programme. Baseline data were related to four domains: dysphagia, lip function, masticatory performance and patient-related outcome measures (PROM).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Stroke is one of the most common causes of disability-adjusted life years, and dysphagia is a common remaining problem after stroke. Rehabilitation using oral screen training has been suggested to improve swallowing, but evidence is still insufficient.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients diagnosed with stroke with persisting objective and/or subjective swallowing dysfunction after primary rehabilitation were assessed for eligibility. In total, 25 patients were included. Objective function was assessed by swallowing capacity test (SCT), lip force and masticatory performance, subjective function by EAT-10 and NOT-S and PROM by LiSat-11 and ESAS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Baseline data presented a heterogeneous pattern with no significant association between objective and subjective dysfunction. Most of the participants (20/25) showed impaired swallowing capacity in SCT, and 23/24 revealed orofacial dysfunction according to NOT-S. The most common subjective item reported was chewing and swallowing problems (19/24).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The heterogenous findings in the included tests and the lack of correlations emphasise the importance of multidisciplinary approaches to identify objective and subjective orofacial post-stroke dysfunction in clinical practice to be able to offer evidence-based individualised care. The included participants were representative of stroke patients with dysphagia, which supports proceeding with the planned intervention.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12583,"journal":{"name":"Gerodontology","volume":"41 3","pages":"376-384"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ger.12713","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Orofacial dysfunction after stroke—A multidisciplinary approach\",\"authors\":\"Pia Skott,&nbsp;Elisabet Åkesson,&nbsp;Kerstin Johansson,&nbsp;Jesper Dalum,&nbsp;Emmelie Persson,&nbsp;Åsa Karlsson,&nbsp;Åke Seiger,&nbsp;Anita McAllister,&nbsp;Gunilla Sandborgh-Englund\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ger.12713\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This paper describes the study protocol in an ongoing clinical trial evaluating oral screen training as part of a post-stroke rehabilitation programme. Baseline data were related to four domains: dysphagia, lip function, masticatory performance and patient-related outcome measures (PROM).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Stroke is one of the most common causes of disability-adjusted life years, and dysphagia is a common remaining problem after stroke. Rehabilitation using oral screen training has been suggested to improve swallowing, but evidence is still insufficient.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients diagnosed with stroke with persisting objective and/or subjective swallowing dysfunction after primary rehabilitation were assessed for eligibility. In total, 25 patients were included. Objective function was assessed by swallowing capacity test (SCT), lip force and masticatory performance, subjective function by EAT-10 and NOT-S and PROM by LiSat-11 and ESAS.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Baseline data presented a heterogeneous pattern with no significant association between objective and subjective dysfunction. Most of the participants (20/25) showed impaired swallowing capacity in SCT, and 23/24 revealed orofacial dysfunction according to NOT-S. The most common subjective item reported was chewing and swallowing problems (19/24).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The heterogenous findings in the included tests and the lack of correlations emphasise the importance of multidisciplinary approaches to identify objective and subjective orofacial post-stroke dysfunction in clinical practice to be able to offer evidence-based individualised care. The included participants were representative of stroke patients with dysphagia, which supports proceeding with the planned intervention.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gerodontology\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"376-384\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ger.12713\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gerodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ger.12713\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ger.12713","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本文介绍了一项正在进行的临床试验的研究方案,该试验评估了作为中风后康复计划一部分的口腔筛查训练。基线数据涉及四个方面:吞咽困难、唇功能、咀嚼功能和患者相关结果测量(PROM):背景:中风是导致残疾调整寿命的最常见原因之一,而吞咽困难是中风后常见的遗留问题。背景:脑卒中是导致残疾调整寿命的最常见原因之一,而吞咽困难是脑卒中后常见的遗留问题。有人建议通过口腔筛查训练进行康复治疗来改善吞咽功能,但目前证据仍不充分:评估被诊断为中风且在初级康复后仍存在客观和/或主观吞咽功能障碍的患者的资格。共纳入 25 名患者。客观功能通过吞咽能力测试(SCT)、唇力和咀嚼功能进行评估,主观功能通过EAT-10和NOT-S进行评估,PROM通过LiSat-11和ESAS进行评估:结果:基线数据呈现出不同的模式,客观和主观功能障碍之间无明显关联。大多数参与者(20/25)在 SCT 中显示吞咽能力受损,23/24 在 NOT-S 中显示口面部功能障碍。最常见的主观项目是咀嚼和吞咽困难(19/24):结论:所纳入的测试结果各不相同,且缺乏相关性,这强调了在临床实践中采用多学科方法识别客观和主观卒中后口面部功能障碍的重要性,以便能够提供以证据为基础的个性化护理。所纳入的参与者在有吞咽困难的中风患者中具有代表性,这为继续进行计划中的干预提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Orofacial dysfunction after stroke—A multidisciplinary approach

Orofacial dysfunction after stroke—A multidisciplinary approach

Objective

This paper describes the study protocol in an ongoing clinical trial evaluating oral screen training as part of a post-stroke rehabilitation programme. Baseline data were related to four domains: dysphagia, lip function, masticatory performance and patient-related outcome measures (PROM).

Background

Stroke is one of the most common causes of disability-adjusted life years, and dysphagia is a common remaining problem after stroke. Rehabilitation using oral screen training has been suggested to improve swallowing, but evidence is still insufficient.

Materials and Methods

Patients diagnosed with stroke with persisting objective and/or subjective swallowing dysfunction after primary rehabilitation were assessed for eligibility. In total, 25 patients were included. Objective function was assessed by swallowing capacity test (SCT), lip force and masticatory performance, subjective function by EAT-10 and NOT-S and PROM by LiSat-11 and ESAS.

Results

Baseline data presented a heterogeneous pattern with no significant association between objective and subjective dysfunction. Most of the participants (20/25) showed impaired swallowing capacity in SCT, and 23/24 revealed orofacial dysfunction according to NOT-S. The most common subjective item reported was chewing and swallowing problems (19/24).

Conclusion

The heterogenous findings in the included tests and the lack of correlations emphasise the importance of multidisciplinary approaches to identify objective and subjective orofacial post-stroke dysfunction in clinical practice to be able to offer evidence-based individualised care. The included participants were representative of stroke patients with dysphagia, which supports proceeding with the planned intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gerodontology
Gerodontology 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Gerodontology is to improve the quality of life and oral health of older people. The boundaries of most conventional dental specialties must be repeatedly crossed to provide optimal dental care for older people. In addition, management of other health problems impacts on dental care and clinicians need knowledge in these numerous overlapping areas. Bringing together these diverse topics within one journal serves clinicians who are seeking to read and to publish papers across a broad spectrum of specialties. This journal provides the juxtaposition of papers from traditional specialties but which share this patient-centred interest, providing a synergy that serves progress in the subject of gerodontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信