泰国菜场喷雾器尿草甘膦生物监测。

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Sasivimol Bootsikeaw, Pornpimol Kongtip, Noppanun Nankongnab, Suttinun Chantanakul, Dusit Sujirarat, Redeerat Mahaboonpeeti, Phanthawee Khangkhun, Susan Woskie
{"title":"泰国菜场喷雾器尿草甘膦生物监测。","authors":"Sasivimol Bootsikeaw,&nbsp;Pornpimol Kongtip,&nbsp;Noppanun Nankongnab,&nbsp;Suttinun Chantanakul,&nbsp;Dusit Sujirarat,&nbsp;Redeerat Mahaboonpeeti,&nbsp;Phanthawee Khangkhun,&nbsp;Susan Woskie","doi":"10.1080/10807039.2020.1797471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Thailand, glyphosate is popular herbicide to control pests in the agricultural sector. This study aimed to measure glyphosate exposure concentrations through inhalation, dermal contact, and urinary glyphosate concentrations among 43 vegetable farmers spraying glyphosate in Bungphra Subdistrict, Phitsanulok Province. Four types of spraying equipment were used, manual pump backpack (<i>n</i> = 3), motorized spray backpack (<i>n</i> = 22), battery pump backpack (<i>n</i> = 16), and high pressure pump (<i>n</i> = 2). Breathing zone air samples were collected using glass fiber filters; dermal contact samples were collected using 100 cm<sup>2</sup> cotton patches attached on 10 body locations and urine samples were collected at 3 time points: morning void urine the day before spraying, the end of spraying event, and the morning void urine the next day of spraying. The results showed that the geometric mean (GM; geometric standard deviation [GSD]) of breathing zone concentrations of glyphosate exposure were 9.37 (10.17) μg/m<sup>3</sup>. The GM (GSD) of total dermal patches exposure concentrations were 7.57 (0.01) mg/h. The legs, back, and arms were the most exposed body areas. The GM (GSD) of urinary glyphosate was found highest among vegetable farmers using manual backpack 46.90 (1.35) μg/g creatinine. Farmers should wear masks and boots to reduce glyphosate exposure by inhalation and dermal contact.</p>","PeriodicalId":13118,"journal":{"name":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment","volume":"27 4","pages":"1019-1036"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10807039.2020.1797471","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urinary glyphosate biomonitoring of sprayers in vegetable farm in Thailand.\",\"authors\":\"Sasivimol Bootsikeaw,&nbsp;Pornpimol Kongtip,&nbsp;Noppanun Nankongnab,&nbsp;Suttinun Chantanakul,&nbsp;Dusit Sujirarat,&nbsp;Redeerat Mahaboonpeeti,&nbsp;Phanthawee Khangkhun,&nbsp;Susan Woskie\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10807039.2020.1797471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In Thailand, glyphosate is popular herbicide to control pests in the agricultural sector. This study aimed to measure glyphosate exposure concentrations through inhalation, dermal contact, and urinary glyphosate concentrations among 43 vegetable farmers spraying glyphosate in Bungphra Subdistrict, Phitsanulok Province. Four types of spraying equipment were used, manual pump backpack (<i>n</i> = 3), motorized spray backpack (<i>n</i> = 22), battery pump backpack (<i>n</i> = 16), and high pressure pump (<i>n</i> = 2). Breathing zone air samples were collected using glass fiber filters; dermal contact samples were collected using 100 cm<sup>2</sup> cotton patches attached on 10 body locations and urine samples were collected at 3 time points: morning void urine the day before spraying, the end of spraying event, and the morning void urine the next day of spraying. The results showed that the geometric mean (GM; geometric standard deviation [GSD]) of breathing zone concentrations of glyphosate exposure were 9.37 (10.17) μg/m<sup>3</sup>. The GM (GSD) of total dermal patches exposure concentrations were 7.57 (0.01) mg/h. The legs, back, and arms were the most exposed body areas. The GM (GSD) of urinary glyphosate was found highest among vegetable farmers using manual backpack 46.90 (1.35) μg/g creatinine. Farmers should wear masks and boots to reduce glyphosate exposure by inhalation and dermal contact.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment\",\"volume\":\"27 4\",\"pages\":\"1019-1036\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10807039.2020.1797471\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2020.1797471\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2020.1797471","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

在泰国,草甘膦是一种流行的除草剂,用于控制农业部门的害虫。本研究旨在通过吸入、皮肤接触和尿中草甘膦浓度测量43名喷洒草甘膦的菜农的草甘膦暴露浓度。采用手动泵双肩包(n = 3)、电动喷淋双肩包(n = 22)、电池泵双肩包(n = 16)、高压泵(n = 2) 4种喷雾设备。呼吸区空气样本采用玻璃纤维过滤器采集;在10个身体部位贴敷100 cm2棉片采集皮肤接触样本,并在喷洒前一天早晨空尿、喷洒事件结束、喷洒第二天早晨空尿3个时间点采集尿液样本。结果表明:几何平均(GM;呼吸区草甘膦暴露浓度几何标准差(GSD)为9.37 (10.17)μg/m3。皮肤总贴片暴露浓度的GM (GSD)为7.57 (0.01)mg/h。腿部、背部和手臂是暴露最多的身体部位。使用手工背包的菜农尿草甘膦GM (GSD)最高,为46.90 (1.35)μg/g肌酐。农民应佩戴口罩和靴子,以减少通过吸入和皮肤接触接触草甘膦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Urinary glyphosate biomonitoring of sprayers in vegetable farm in Thailand.

In Thailand, glyphosate is popular herbicide to control pests in the agricultural sector. This study aimed to measure glyphosate exposure concentrations through inhalation, dermal contact, and urinary glyphosate concentrations among 43 vegetable farmers spraying glyphosate in Bungphra Subdistrict, Phitsanulok Province. Four types of spraying equipment were used, manual pump backpack (n = 3), motorized spray backpack (n = 22), battery pump backpack (n = 16), and high pressure pump (n = 2). Breathing zone air samples were collected using glass fiber filters; dermal contact samples were collected using 100 cm2 cotton patches attached on 10 body locations and urine samples were collected at 3 time points: morning void urine the day before spraying, the end of spraying event, and the morning void urine the next day of spraying. The results showed that the geometric mean (GM; geometric standard deviation [GSD]) of breathing zone concentrations of glyphosate exposure were 9.37 (10.17) μg/m3. The GM (GSD) of total dermal patches exposure concentrations were 7.57 (0.01) mg/h. The legs, back, and arms were the most exposed body areas. The GM (GSD) of urinary glyphosate was found highest among vegetable farmers using manual backpack 46.90 (1.35) μg/g creatinine. Farmers should wear masks and boots to reduce glyphosate exposure by inhalation and dermal contact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human and Ecological Risk Assessment
Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Human and Ecological Risk Assessment provides a resource for professionals researching and assessing environmental hazards to both humans and ecological systems. The editors expect papers published to be original, of sound science, purposeful for risk analysis (assessment, communication, management) and related areas, well written (in English), and a contribution to the scientific literature. The journal''s emphasis is on publication of papers that contribute to improvements in human and ecological health. The journal is an international, fully peer-reviewed publication that publishes eight issues annually. The journal''s scope includes scientific and technical information and critical analysis in the following areas: -Quantitative Risk Assessment- Comparative Risk Assessment- Integrated Human & Ecological Risk Assessment- Risk Assessment Applications to Human & Ecosystems Health- Exposure Assessment- Environmental Fate Assessment- Multi-Media Assessment- Hazard Assessment- Environmental Epidemiology- Statistical Models and Methods- Methods Development/Improvement- Toxicokinetics Modeling- Animal to Human Extrapolation- Risk Perception/Communication- Risk Management- Regulatory Issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信