Christian O Ogah, Chidebe C Anikwe, Cyril C Ikeoha, Okechukwu Bi Dimejesi, Bartholomew C Okorochukwu, Chidi Ou Esike
{"title":"氨甲环酸与米索前列醇减少剖宫产出血量的随机对照试验。","authors":"Christian O Ogah, Chidebe C Anikwe, Cyril C Ikeoha, Okechukwu Bi Dimejesi, Bartholomew C Okorochukwu, Chidi Ou Esike","doi":"10.4314/gmj.v56i2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the efficacy of intravenous tranexamic acid versus rectal misoprostol in decreasing intraoperative blood loss during caesarean section (C/S).</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Randomised controlled study involving pregnant women undergoing C/S at Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki in Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Participants and interventions: </strong>Five hundred and fourteen women undergoing elective C/S were assigned randomly (257 patients per group) to receive either pre-operative 1000 µg rectal misoprostol or 1000mg intravenous tranexamic acid after spinal anaesthesia. Data from 248 patients were analysed in the misoprostol group, while data from 250 patients were analysed in the tranexamic acid group. Sixteen patients were excluded from analysis; nine had incompletely filled proforma, while seven were lost to follow-up.</p><p><strong>Main outcome: </strong>Intraoperative blood loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean intraoperative blood loss was not significantly different between the misoprostol group and the tranexamic acid group (547 ± 183.75ml vs. 551.66 ± 21.74ml, P = 0.157). The mean difference in pack cell volume (PCV) changes was not significant between the groups (2.41±0.95% vs. 2.36±0.56%, P = 0.474). The side effects profile was similar for both groups except for shivering, which was statistically higher among the misoprostol group (RR = 0.70; 95%CI 0.40 - 0.91, P = 0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intravenous tranexamic acid was comparable to rectal misoprostol in the reduction of blood loss during C/S. Tranexamic acid could act as a good alternative to misoprostol for prophylaxis for blood loss during elective C/S.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None declared.</p>","PeriodicalId":35509,"journal":{"name":"Ghana Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336466/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A randomised controlled trial of tranexamic acid versus misoprostol in reducing blood loss during caesarean section.\",\"authors\":\"Christian O Ogah, Chidebe C Anikwe, Cyril C Ikeoha, Okechukwu Bi Dimejesi, Bartholomew C Okorochukwu, Chidi Ou Esike\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/gmj.v56i2.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the efficacy of intravenous tranexamic acid versus rectal misoprostol in decreasing intraoperative blood loss during caesarean section (C/S).</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Randomised controlled study involving pregnant women undergoing C/S at Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki in Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Participants and interventions: </strong>Five hundred and fourteen women undergoing elective C/S were assigned randomly (257 patients per group) to receive either pre-operative 1000 µg rectal misoprostol or 1000mg intravenous tranexamic acid after spinal anaesthesia. Data from 248 patients were analysed in the misoprostol group, while data from 250 patients were analysed in the tranexamic acid group. Sixteen patients were excluded from analysis; nine had incompletely filled proforma, while seven were lost to follow-up.</p><p><strong>Main outcome: </strong>Intraoperative blood loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean intraoperative blood loss was not significantly different between the misoprostol group and the tranexamic acid group (547 ± 183.75ml vs. 551.66 ± 21.74ml, P = 0.157). The mean difference in pack cell volume (PCV) changes was not significant between the groups (2.41±0.95% vs. 2.36±0.56%, P = 0.474). The side effects profile was similar for both groups except for shivering, which was statistically higher among the misoprostol group (RR = 0.70; 95%CI 0.40 - 0.91, P = 0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intravenous tranexamic acid was comparable to rectal misoprostol in the reduction of blood loss during C/S. Tranexamic acid could act as a good alternative to misoprostol for prophylaxis for blood loss during elective C/S.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None declared.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ghana Medical Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336466/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ghana Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/gmj.v56i2.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ghana Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/gmj.v56i2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
目的:比较静脉注射氨甲环酸与直肠注射米索前列醇减少剖宫产术中出血量(C/S)的效果。设计和环境:随机对照研究涉及尼日利亚Abakaliki Alex Ekwueme联邦大学教学医院接受C/S的孕妇。参与者和干预措施:514名接受选择性C/S的女性被随机分配(每组257名患者),在脊髓麻醉后接受术前1000µg直肠米索前列醇或1000mg静脉氨甲环酸。米索前列醇组分析了248例患者的数据,氨甲环酸组分析了250例患者的数据。16例患者被排除在分析之外;9例形式表格填写不完整,7例随访丢失。主要结局:术中失血。结果:米索前列醇组术中平均出血量与氨甲环酸组无显著差异(547±183.75ml∶551.66±21.74ml, P = 0.157)。各组细胞体积(PCV)变化平均差异无统计学意义(2.41±0.95% vs. 2.36±0.56%,P = 0.474)。两组的副作用情况相似,除了颤抖,米索前列醇组的副作用在统计学上更高(RR = 0.70;95%ci 0.40 - 0.91, p = 0.028)。结论:静脉注射氨甲环酸与直肠米索前列醇在C/S术中减少出血量的效果相当。氨甲环酸可作为米索前列醇的良好替代品预防选择性C/S期间的失血。资金:未宣布。
A randomised controlled trial of tranexamic acid versus misoprostol in reducing blood loss during caesarean section.
Objective: To determine the efficacy of intravenous tranexamic acid versus rectal misoprostol in decreasing intraoperative blood loss during caesarean section (C/S).
Design and setting: Randomised controlled study involving pregnant women undergoing C/S at Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki in Nigeria.
Participants and interventions: Five hundred and fourteen women undergoing elective C/S were assigned randomly (257 patients per group) to receive either pre-operative 1000 µg rectal misoprostol or 1000mg intravenous tranexamic acid after spinal anaesthesia. Data from 248 patients were analysed in the misoprostol group, while data from 250 patients were analysed in the tranexamic acid group. Sixteen patients were excluded from analysis; nine had incompletely filled proforma, while seven were lost to follow-up.
Main outcome: Intraoperative blood loss.
Results: The mean intraoperative blood loss was not significantly different between the misoprostol group and the tranexamic acid group (547 ± 183.75ml vs. 551.66 ± 21.74ml, P = 0.157). The mean difference in pack cell volume (PCV) changes was not significant between the groups (2.41±0.95% vs. 2.36±0.56%, P = 0.474). The side effects profile was similar for both groups except for shivering, which was statistically higher among the misoprostol group (RR = 0.70; 95%CI 0.40 - 0.91, P = 0.028).
Conclusion: Intravenous tranexamic acid was comparable to rectal misoprostol in the reduction of blood loss during C/S. Tranexamic acid could act as a good alternative to misoprostol for prophylaxis for blood loss during elective C/S.