成人和青少年髌股疼痛患者报告的结果测量:使用COSMIN方法对结构有效性、可靠性、反应性和可解释性的系统评价。

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Lisa T Hoglund, David A Scalzitti, Dhinu J Jayaseelan, Lori A Bolgla, Susan Flannery Wainwright
{"title":"成人和青少年髌股疼痛患者报告的结果测量:使用COSMIN方法对结构有效性、可靠性、反应性和可解释性的系统评价。","authors":"Lisa T Hoglund, David A Scalzitti, Dhinu J Jayaseelan, Lori A Bolgla, Susan Flannery Wainwright","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> We aimed to appraise the construct validity, reliability, responsiveness, and interpretability of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to assess function and pain in adults and adolescents with patellofemoral pain (PFP). <b>DESIGN:</b> Systematic review of measurement properties <b>LITERATURE SEARCH:</b> We searched the PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to January 6, 2022. <b>STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA:</b> We included studies that assessed the measurement properties of English-language PROMs for PFP and their cultural adaptations and translations. <b>DATA SYNTHESIS:</b> Using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology, we determined overall ratings and quality of evidence for construct validity, internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, and responsiveness. We extracted data related to interpretability for clinical use. <b>RESULTS:</b> After screening 7066 titles, 61 studies for 33 PROMs were included. Only 2 PROMs had evidence of \"sufficient\" or \"indeterminate\" quality for all measurement properties. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score patellofemoral subscale (KOOS-PF) had \"low\" to \"high\" quality evidence for a rating of \"sufficient\" for 4 measurement properties. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) had very low-quality evidence for a \"sufficient\" rating for 4 measurement properties. The KOOS-PF and LEFS were rated \"indeterminate\" for structural validity and internal consistency. The KOOS-PF had the best interpretability with reported minimal important change and 0% ceiling and floor effects. No studies examined cross-cultural validity. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> The KOOS-PF and LEFS had the strongest measurement properties among PROMs used for PFP. More research is needed, particularly regarding structural validity and interpretability of PROMs. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(8):1-20. Epub: 20 June 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11730</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Adults and Adolescents With Patellofemoral Pain: A Systematic Review of Construct Validity, Reliability, Responsiveness, and Interpretability Using the COSMIN Methodology.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa T Hoglund, David A Scalzitti, Dhinu J Jayaseelan, Lori A Bolgla, Susan Flannery Wainwright\",\"doi\":\"10.2519/jospt.2023.11730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> We aimed to appraise the construct validity, reliability, responsiveness, and interpretability of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to assess function and pain in adults and adolescents with patellofemoral pain (PFP). <b>DESIGN:</b> Systematic review of measurement properties <b>LITERATURE SEARCH:</b> We searched the PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to January 6, 2022. <b>STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA:</b> We included studies that assessed the measurement properties of English-language PROMs for PFP and their cultural adaptations and translations. <b>DATA SYNTHESIS:</b> Using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology, we determined overall ratings and quality of evidence for construct validity, internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, and responsiveness. We extracted data related to interpretability for clinical use. <b>RESULTS:</b> After screening 7066 titles, 61 studies for 33 PROMs were included. Only 2 PROMs had evidence of \\\"sufficient\\\" or \\\"indeterminate\\\" quality for all measurement properties. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score patellofemoral subscale (KOOS-PF) had \\\"low\\\" to \\\"high\\\" quality evidence for a rating of \\\"sufficient\\\" for 4 measurement properties. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) had very low-quality evidence for a \\\"sufficient\\\" rating for 4 measurement properties. The KOOS-PF and LEFS were rated \\\"indeterminate\\\" for structural validity and internal consistency. The KOOS-PF had the best interpretability with reported minimal important change and 0% ceiling and floor effects. No studies examined cross-cultural validity. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> The KOOS-PF and LEFS had the strongest measurement properties among PROMs used for PFP. More research is needed, particularly regarding structural validity and interpretability of PROMs. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(8):1-20. Epub: 20 June 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11730</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2023.11730\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2023.11730","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们旨在评估用于评估成人和青少年髌股疼痛(PFP)功能和疼痛的患者报告结果测量(PROM)的结构有效性、可靠性、反应性和可解释性。设计:测量特性的系统回顾文献检索:我们从成立到2022年1月6日检索了PubMed、CINAHL、Scopus、SPORTDiscus和Cochrane Library数据库。研究选择标准:我们纳入了评估英语PROM对PFP的测量特性及其文化适应和翻译的研究。数据综合:使用基于康森索斯的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)方法,我们确定了结构有效性、内部一致性、可靠性、测量误差和响应性的总体评级和证据质量。我们提取了与临床使用的可解释性相关的数据。结果:筛选7066个标题后,纳入了针对33个PROM的61项研究。只有2个PROM有证据表明所有测量属性的质量“足够”或“不确定”。膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分髌股分量表(KOOS-PF)具有“低”到“高”的质量证据,对4种测量特性的评分为“足够”。下肢功能量表(LEFS)有非常低质量的证据证明4种测量特性的“充分”评级。KOOS-PF和LEFS在结构有效性和内部一致性方面被评为“不确定”。KOOS-PF具有最好的可解释性,报告的重要变化最小,天花板和地板效应为0%。没有研究检验跨文化有效性。结论:在用于PFP的PROM中,KOOS-PF和LEFS具有最强的测量性能。还需要更多的研究,特别是关于PROM的结构有效性和可解释性。骨科运动物理杂志2023;53(8):1-20。Epub:2023年6月20日。doi:10.2519/josp.2023.11730。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Adults and Adolescents With Patellofemoral Pain: A Systematic Review of Construct Validity, Reliability, Responsiveness, and Interpretability Using the COSMIN Methodology.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to appraise the construct validity, reliability, responsiveness, and interpretability of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to assess function and pain in adults and adolescents with patellofemoral pain (PFP). DESIGN: Systematic review of measurement properties LITERATURE SEARCH: We searched the PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to January 6, 2022. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: We included studies that assessed the measurement properties of English-language PROMs for PFP and their cultural adaptations and translations. DATA SYNTHESIS: Using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology, we determined overall ratings and quality of evidence for construct validity, internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, and responsiveness. We extracted data related to interpretability for clinical use. RESULTS: After screening 7066 titles, 61 studies for 33 PROMs were included. Only 2 PROMs had evidence of "sufficient" or "indeterminate" quality for all measurement properties. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score patellofemoral subscale (KOOS-PF) had "low" to "high" quality evidence for a rating of "sufficient" for 4 measurement properties. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) had very low-quality evidence for a "sufficient" rating for 4 measurement properties. The KOOS-PF and LEFS were rated "indeterminate" for structural validity and internal consistency. The KOOS-PF had the best interpretability with reported minimal important change and 0% ceiling and floor effects. No studies examined cross-cultural validity. CONCLUSION: The KOOS-PF and LEFS had the strongest measurement properties among PROMs used for PFP. More research is needed, particularly regarding structural validity and interpretability of PROMs. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(8):1-20. Epub: 20 June 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11730.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy® (JOSPT®) publishes scientifically rigorous, clinically relevant content for physical therapists and others in the health care community to advance musculoskeletal and sports-related practice globally. To this end, JOSPT features the latest evidence-based research and clinical cases in musculoskeletal health, injury, and rehabilitation, including physical therapy, orthopaedics, sports medicine, and biomechanics. With an impact factor of 3.090, JOSPT is among the highest ranked physical therapy journals in Clarivate Analytics''s Journal Citation Reports, Science Edition (2017). JOSPT stands eighth of 65 journals in the category of rehabilitation, twelfth of 77 journals in orthopedics, and fourteenth of 81 journals in sport sciences. JOSPT''s 5-year impact factor is 4.061.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信