非诺布酸135 mg胶囊与110 mg肠溶片在健康志愿者体内的安全性及药动学比较。

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Yu-Bin Seo, Jae Hoon Kim, Ji Hye Song, WonTae Jung, Kyu-Yeol Nam, Nyung Kim, Youn-Woong Choi, SangMin Cho, Do-Hyung Ki, Hye Jung Lee, JungHa Moon, SeungSeob Lee, JaeHee Kim, Jang Hee Hong, Jung Sunwoo, Jin-Gyu Jung
{"title":"非诺布酸135 mg胶囊与110 mg肠溶片在健康志愿者体内的安全性及药动学比较。","authors":"Yu-Bin Seo,&nbsp;Jae Hoon Kim,&nbsp;Ji Hye Song,&nbsp;WonTae Jung,&nbsp;Kyu-Yeol Nam,&nbsp;Nyung Kim,&nbsp;Youn-Woong Choi,&nbsp;SangMin Cho,&nbsp;Do-Hyung Ki,&nbsp;Hye Jung Lee,&nbsp;JungHa Moon,&nbsp;SeungSeob Lee,&nbsp;JaeHee Kim,&nbsp;Jang Hee Hong,&nbsp;Jung Sunwoo,&nbsp;Jin-Gyu Jung","doi":"10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles of 2 fenofibric acid formulations under fasting and fed conditions. The reference was a 135 mg capsule, while the test was a 110 mg enteric-coated tablet. This randomized, open-label, two-sequence, two-period crossover phase 1 clinical trial was conducted in healthy Korean men. Sixty participants were enrolled in each of the fasting and feeding groups. Blood samples were collected 72 hours after drug administration. PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental method with Phoenix WinNonlin<sup>®</sup>. A total of 53 and 51 participants from the fasting and feeding groups, respectively, completed the study. The geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence intervals of the maximum concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) and area under the concentration-time curve to the last measurable plasma concentration were 0.9195 (0.8795-0.9614) and 0.8630 (0.8472-0.8791) in the fasting study and 1.0926 (1.0102-1.1818) and 0.9998 (0.9675-1.0332) in the fed study, respectively. The time to reach C<sub>max</sub> of the enteric-coated tablet compared to that of the capsule was extended by 1 and 3 hours under fasting and fed conditions, respectively. In conclusion, enteric-coated tablets have a higher bioavailability than capsules. In addition, the enteric-coated tablet was smaller than the capsule, making it easier for patients to swallow.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0007177, KCT0003304.</p>","PeriodicalId":23288,"journal":{"name":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5c/ea/tcp-31-95.PMC10333648.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and pharmacokinetic comparison between fenofibric acid 135 mg capsule and 110 mg enteric-coated tablet in healthy volunteers.\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Bin Seo,&nbsp;Jae Hoon Kim,&nbsp;Ji Hye Song,&nbsp;WonTae Jung,&nbsp;Kyu-Yeol Nam,&nbsp;Nyung Kim,&nbsp;Youn-Woong Choi,&nbsp;SangMin Cho,&nbsp;Do-Hyung Ki,&nbsp;Hye Jung Lee,&nbsp;JungHa Moon,&nbsp;SeungSeob Lee,&nbsp;JaeHee Kim,&nbsp;Jang Hee Hong,&nbsp;Jung Sunwoo,&nbsp;Jin-Gyu Jung\",\"doi\":\"10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles of 2 fenofibric acid formulations under fasting and fed conditions. The reference was a 135 mg capsule, while the test was a 110 mg enteric-coated tablet. This randomized, open-label, two-sequence, two-period crossover phase 1 clinical trial was conducted in healthy Korean men. Sixty participants were enrolled in each of the fasting and feeding groups. Blood samples were collected 72 hours after drug administration. PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental method with Phoenix WinNonlin<sup>®</sup>. A total of 53 and 51 participants from the fasting and feeding groups, respectively, completed the study. The geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence intervals of the maximum concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) and area under the concentration-time curve to the last measurable plasma concentration were 0.9195 (0.8795-0.9614) and 0.8630 (0.8472-0.8791) in the fasting study and 1.0926 (1.0102-1.1818) and 0.9998 (0.9675-1.0332) in the fed study, respectively. The time to reach C<sub>max</sub> of the enteric-coated tablet compared to that of the capsule was extended by 1 and 3 hours under fasting and fed conditions, respectively. In conclusion, enteric-coated tablets have a higher bioavailability than capsules. In addition, the enteric-coated tablet was smaller than the capsule, making it easier for patients to swallow.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0007177, KCT0003304.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5c/ea/tcp-31-95.PMC10333648.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较两种非诺纤维酸制剂在禁食和喂养条件下的药代动力学(PK)和安全性。参照物为135毫克胶囊,试验物为110毫克肠溶片。这项随机、开放标签、两序列、两期交叉一期临床试验在健康的韩国男性中进行。禁食组和喂食组各有60名参与者。给药后72小时采集血样。采用Phoenix WinNonlin®非区室法计算PK参数。禁食组和喂养组分别有53名和51名参与者完成了这项研究。空腹组最大浓度(Cmax)和浓度-时间曲线下面积与最后可测血浆浓度的几何平均比值和90%置信区间分别为0.9195(0.8795-0.9614)和0.8630(0.8472-0.8791),不食组为1.0926(1.0102-1.1818)和0.9998(0.9675-1.0332)。在空腹和喂养条件下,肠溶片达到Cmax的时间分别比胶囊延长1小时和3小时。综上所述,肠溶片比胶囊具有更高的生物利用度。此外,肠溶片比胶囊更小,使患者更容易吞咽。试验注册:临床研究信息服务标识:KCT0007177, KCT0003304。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and pharmacokinetic comparison between fenofibric acid 135 mg capsule and 110 mg enteric-coated tablet in healthy volunteers.

This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles of 2 fenofibric acid formulations under fasting and fed conditions. The reference was a 135 mg capsule, while the test was a 110 mg enteric-coated tablet. This randomized, open-label, two-sequence, two-period crossover phase 1 clinical trial was conducted in healthy Korean men. Sixty participants were enrolled in each of the fasting and feeding groups. Blood samples were collected 72 hours after drug administration. PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental method with Phoenix WinNonlin®. A total of 53 and 51 participants from the fasting and feeding groups, respectively, completed the study. The geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence intervals of the maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve to the last measurable plasma concentration were 0.9195 (0.8795-0.9614) and 0.8630 (0.8472-0.8791) in the fasting study and 1.0926 (1.0102-1.1818) and 0.9998 (0.9675-1.0332) in the fed study, respectively. The time to reach Cmax of the enteric-coated tablet compared to that of the capsule was extended by 1 and 3 hours under fasting and fed conditions, respectively. In conclusion, enteric-coated tablets have a higher bioavailability than capsules. In addition, the enteric-coated tablet was smaller than the capsule, making it easier for patients to swallow.

Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0007177, KCT0003304.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Translational and Clinical Pharmacology
Translational and Clinical Pharmacology Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Translational and Clinical Pharmacology (Transl Clin Pharmacol, TCP) is the official journal of the Korean Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (KSCPT). TCP is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the dissemination of knowledge relating to all aspects of translational and clinical pharmacology. The categories for publication include pharmacokinetics (PK) and drug disposition, drug metabolism, pharmacodynamics (PD), clinical trials and design issues, pharmacogenomics and pharmacogenetics, pharmacometrics, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilence, and human pharmacology. Studies involving animal models, pharmacological characterization, and clinical trials are appropriate for consideration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信