母乳喂养期间的药物安全——从病例报告到建模:concept项目的贡献。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Evelina Cardoso, Monia Guidi, Nina Nauwelaerts, Hedvig Nordeng, Marie Teil, Karel Allegaert, Anne Smits, Peggy Gandia, Andrea Edginton, Shinya Ito, Pieter Annaert, Alice Panchaud
{"title":"母乳喂养期间的药物安全——从病例报告到建模:concept项目的贡献。","authors":"Evelina Cardoso,&nbsp;Monia Guidi,&nbsp;Nina Nauwelaerts,&nbsp;Hedvig Nordeng,&nbsp;Marie Teil,&nbsp;Karel Allegaert,&nbsp;Anne Smits,&nbsp;Peggy Gandia,&nbsp;Andrea Edginton,&nbsp;Shinya Ito,&nbsp;Pieter Annaert,&nbsp;Alice Panchaud","doi":"10.1080/17425255.2023.2221847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite many research efforts, current data on the safety of medicines during breastfeeding are either fragmented or lacking, resulting in restrictive labeling of most medicines. In the absence of pharmacoepidemiologic safety studies, risk estimation for breastfed infants is mainly derived from pharmacokinetic (PK) information on medicine. This manuscript provides a description and a comparison of the different methodological approaches that can yield reliable information on medicine transfer into human milk and the resulting infant exposure.</p><p><strong>Area covered: </strong>Currently, most information on medicine transfer in human milk relies on case reports or traditional PK studies, which generate data that can hardly be generalized to the population. Some methodological approaches, such as population PK (popPK) and physiologically based PK (PBPK) modeling, can be used to provide a more complete characterization of infant medicine exposure through human milk and simulate the most extreme situations while decreasing the burden of sampling in breastfeeding women.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>PBPK and popPK modeling are promising approaches to fill the gap in knowledge of medicine safety in breastfeeding, as illustrated with our escitalopram example.</p>","PeriodicalId":12250,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology","volume":"19 5","pages":"269-283"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of medicines during breastfeeding - from case report to modeling: a contribution from the ConcePTION project.\",\"authors\":\"Evelina Cardoso,&nbsp;Monia Guidi,&nbsp;Nina Nauwelaerts,&nbsp;Hedvig Nordeng,&nbsp;Marie Teil,&nbsp;Karel Allegaert,&nbsp;Anne Smits,&nbsp;Peggy Gandia,&nbsp;Andrea Edginton,&nbsp;Shinya Ito,&nbsp;Pieter Annaert,&nbsp;Alice Panchaud\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17425255.2023.2221847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite many research efforts, current data on the safety of medicines during breastfeeding are either fragmented or lacking, resulting in restrictive labeling of most medicines. In the absence of pharmacoepidemiologic safety studies, risk estimation for breastfed infants is mainly derived from pharmacokinetic (PK) information on medicine. This manuscript provides a description and a comparison of the different methodological approaches that can yield reliable information on medicine transfer into human milk and the resulting infant exposure.</p><p><strong>Area covered: </strong>Currently, most information on medicine transfer in human milk relies on case reports or traditional PK studies, which generate data that can hardly be generalized to the population. Some methodological approaches, such as population PK (popPK) and physiologically based PK (PBPK) modeling, can be used to provide a more complete characterization of infant medicine exposure through human milk and simulate the most extreme situations while decreasing the burden of sampling in breastfeeding women.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>PBPK and popPK modeling are promising approaches to fill the gap in knowledge of medicine safety in breastfeeding, as illustrated with our escitalopram example.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"19 5\",\"pages\":\"269-283\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2023.2221847\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2023.2221847","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

导言:尽管进行了许多研究工作,但目前关于母乳喂养期间药物安全性的数据要么是碎片化的,要么是缺乏的,导致大多数药物的标签都是限制性的。在缺乏药物流行病学安全性研究的情况下,母乳喂养婴儿的风险估计主要来自药物的药代动力学(PK)信息。这篇手稿提供了不同的方法方法的描述和比较,可以产生关于药物转移到人乳和由此产生的婴儿暴露的可靠信息。涉及领域:目前,大多数关于母乳中药物转移的信息依赖于病例报告或传统的PK研究,这些研究产生的数据很难推广到人群。人口PK (popPK)和基于生理的PK (PBPK)建模等方法可用于更完整地描述婴儿通过母乳接触药物的特征,并模拟最极端的情况,同时减少母乳喂养妇女的抽样负担。专家意见:PBPK和popPK建模是填补母乳喂养药物安全知识空白的有希望的方法,正如我们以艾司西酞普兰为例所示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety of medicines during breastfeeding - from case report to modeling: a contribution from the ConcePTION project.

Introduction: Despite many research efforts, current data on the safety of medicines during breastfeeding are either fragmented or lacking, resulting in restrictive labeling of most medicines. In the absence of pharmacoepidemiologic safety studies, risk estimation for breastfed infants is mainly derived from pharmacokinetic (PK) information on medicine. This manuscript provides a description and a comparison of the different methodological approaches that can yield reliable information on medicine transfer into human milk and the resulting infant exposure.

Area covered: Currently, most information on medicine transfer in human milk relies on case reports or traditional PK studies, which generate data that can hardly be generalized to the population. Some methodological approaches, such as population PK (popPK) and physiologically based PK (PBPK) modeling, can be used to provide a more complete characterization of infant medicine exposure through human milk and simulate the most extreme situations while decreasing the burden of sampling in breastfeeding women.

Expert opinion: PBPK and popPK modeling are promising approaches to fill the gap in knowledge of medicine safety in breastfeeding, as illustrated with our escitalopram example.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology
Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.30%
发文量
62
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology (ISSN 1742-5255 [print], 1744-7607 [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of ADME-Tox. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the scope for future development. The Editors welcome: Reviews covering metabolic, pharmacokinetic and toxicological issues relating to specific drugs, drug-drug interactions, drug classes or their use in specific populations; issues relating to enzymes involved in the metabolism, disposition and excretion of drugs; techniques involved in the study of drug metabolism and toxicology; novel technologies for obtaining ADME-Tox data. Drug Evaluations reviewing the clinical, toxicological and pharmacokinetic data on a particular drug. The audience consists of scientists and managers in the pharmaceutical industry, pharmacologists, clinical toxicologists and related professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信