应用医疗失效模式和效应分析方法,提高有组织的大肠癌筛查计划的质量。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Medical Screening Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-07 DOI:10.1177/09691413231197300
Angela Chiereghin, Lorena Squillace, Lorenzo Pizzi, Carmen Bazzani, Lorenzo Roti, Francesca Mezzetti
{"title":"应用医疗失效模式和效应分析方法,提高有组织的大肠癌筛查计划的质量。","authors":"Angela Chiereghin, Lorena Squillace, Lorenzo Pizzi, Carmen Bazzani, Lorenzo Roti, Francesca Mezzetti","doi":"10.1177/09691413231197300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The first level of a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening process was systematically analysed using the Healthcare Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (HFMEA) approach by a multidisciplinary team aiming to improve the programme quality.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was conducted at the Local Health Authority of Bologna, Northern Italy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven brainstorming sessions were conducted and all the activities performed were recorded on a FMEA worksheet consisting of individual records reporting the specific phases of the analysed process along with associated activities, possible failure modes, their causes and effects, the obtained risk priority numbers (RPNs) and the control measures to plan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three failure modes, 14 effects and 12 possible causes were identified. Nine failure modes were prioritised according to the RPN obtained; most resulted in possible false-negative faecal immunochemical test (FIT) results (66.7%), followed by sample loss (22.2%) and not reaching the entire target population (11.1%). This leads to 66.7% of corrective/preventive actions being applied to the phase of returning the stool sample by the citizen. For this phase reorganisation, the local pharmacies were involved not only as FIT kit delivery points but also as specimen collection and sending points to the laboratory. These organisational changes allowed the introduction of complete traceability of kits and specimens flow, as well as temperature control. A re-evaluation of the prioritised failure modes 6 months after launching the implemented screening process showed that HFMEA application decreased the risk of potential errors by 75.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HFMEA application in CRC screening programme is a useful tool to reduce potential errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":" ","pages":"70-77"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying the healthcare failure mode and effects analysis approach to improve the quality of an organised colorectal cancer screening programme.\",\"authors\":\"Angela Chiereghin, Lorena Squillace, Lorenzo Pizzi, Carmen Bazzani, Lorenzo Roti, Francesca Mezzetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09691413231197300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The first level of a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening process was systematically analysed using the Healthcare Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (HFMEA) approach by a multidisciplinary team aiming to improve the programme quality.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was conducted at the Local Health Authority of Bologna, Northern Italy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven brainstorming sessions were conducted and all the activities performed were recorded on a FMEA worksheet consisting of individual records reporting the specific phases of the analysed process along with associated activities, possible failure modes, their causes and effects, the obtained risk priority numbers (RPNs) and the control measures to plan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three failure modes, 14 effects and 12 possible causes were identified. Nine failure modes were prioritised according to the RPN obtained; most resulted in possible false-negative faecal immunochemical test (FIT) results (66.7%), followed by sample loss (22.2%) and not reaching the entire target population (11.1%). This leads to 66.7% of corrective/preventive actions being applied to the phase of returning the stool sample by the citizen. For this phase reorganisation, the local pharmacies were involved not only as FIT kit delivery points but also as specimen collection and sending points to the laboratory. These organisational changes allowed the introduction of complete traceability of kits and specimens flow, as well as temperature control. A re-evaluation of the prioritised failure modes 6 months after launching the implemented screening process showed that HFMEA application decreased the risk of potential errors by 75.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HFMEA application in CRC screening programme is a useful tool to reduce potential errors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Screening\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"70-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Screening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413231197300\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Screening","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413231197300","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:一个多学科团队采用医疗失效模式及影响分析(HFMEA)方法对结直肠癌(CRC)筛查过程的第一阶段进行了系统分析,旨在提高筛查项目的质量:研究在意大利北部博洛尼亚地方卫生局进行:方法:开展了七次集思广益会议,并在 FMEA 工作表中记录了所有活动,该工作表由单个记录组成,报告了所分析流程的具体阶段及相关活动、可能的故障模式、其原因和影响、获得的风险优先级编号(RPN)以及计划采取的控制措施:结果:确定了 23 种故障模式、14 种影响和 12 种可能的原因。根据所获得的风险优先级(RPN),确定了九种故障模式的优先级;大多数故障模式可能导致粪便免疫化学检验(FIT)结果出现假阴性(66.7%),其次是样本丢失(22.2%)和未达到全部目标人群(11.1%)。因此,66.7% 的纠正/预防措施适用于市民交回粪便样本的阶段。在这一阶段的重组中,当地药房不仅作为 FIT 套件的交付点,还作为标本收集点和实验室的发送点参与其中。这些组织结构上的变化使得试剂盒和标本的流向以及温度控制都有了完整的可追溯性。在实施筛查流程 6 个月后,对优先考虑的失败模式进行的重新评估显示,HFMEA 的应用降低了 75.9% 的潜在错误风险:结论:在 CRC 筛查项目中应用 HFMEA 是减少潜在错误的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applying the healthcare failure mode and effects analysis approach to improve the quality of an organised colorectal cancer screening programme.

Objective: The first level of a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening process was systematically analysed using the Healthcare Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (HFMEA) approach by a multidisciplinary team aiming to improve the programme quality.

Setting: The study was conducted at the Local Health Authority of Bologna, Northern Italy.

Methods: Seven brainstorming sessions were conducted and all the activities performed were recorded on a FMEA worksheet consisting of individual records reporting the specific phases of the analysed process along with associated activities, possible failure modes, their causes and effects, the obtained risk priority numbers (RPNs) and the control measures to plan.

Results: Twenty-three failure modes, 14 effects and 12 possible causes were identified. Nine failure modes were prioritised according to the RPN obtained; most resulted in possible false-negative faecal immunochemical test (FIT) results (66.7%), followed by sample loss (22.2%) and not reaching the entire target population (11.1%). This leads to 66.7% of corrective/preventive actions being applied to the phase of returning the stool sample by the citizen. For this phase reorganisation, the local pharmacies were involved not only as FIT kit delivery points but also as specimen collection and sending points to the laboratory. These organisational changes allowed the introduction of complete traceability of kits and specimens flow, as well as temperature control. A re-evaluation of the prioritised failure modes 6 months after launching the implemented screening process showed that HFMEA application decreased the risk of potential errors by 75.9%.

Conclusion: HFMEA application in CRC screening programme is a useful tool to reduce potential errors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Screening
Journal of Medical Screening 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Screening, a fully peer reviewed journal, is concerned with all aspects of medical screening, particularly the publication of research that advances screening theory and practice. The journal aims to increase awareness of the principles of screening (quantitative and statistical aspects), screening techniques and procedures and methodologies from all specialties. An essential subscription for physicians, clinicians and academics with an interest in screening, epidemiology and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信