虚拟护理中的公平性:从医生角度的混合方法研究。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-28 DOI:10.1177/1357633X231194382
Timothy C Guetterman, Emily Koptyra, Olivia Ritchie, Liz B Marquis, Reema Kadri, Anna Laurie, Vg Vinod Vydiswaran, Jiazhao Li, Lindsay K Brown, Tiffany C Veinot, Lorraine R Buis
{"title":"虚拟护理中的公平性:从医生角度的混合方法研究。","authors":"Timothy C Guetterman, Emily Koptyra, Olivia Ritchie, Liz B Marquis, Reema Kadri, Anna Laurie, Vg Vinod Vydiswaran, Jiazhao Li, Lindsay K Brown, Tiffany C Veinot, Lorraine R Buis","doi":"10.1177/1357633X231194382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundVirtual care expanded rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic, and how this shift affected healthcare disparities among subgroups of patients is of concern. Racial and ethnic minorities, older adults, individuals with less education, and lower-income households have lower rates of home broadband, smartphone ownership, and patient portal adoption, which may directly affect access to virtual care. Because primary care is a major access point to healthcare, perspectives of primary care providers are critical to inform the implementation of equitable virtual care.ObjectiveThe aim of this mixed methods study was to explore primary care physician experiences and perceptions of barriers and facilitators to equitable virtual care.DesignWe used an explanatory sequential mixed methods design, which consists of first collecting and analyzing quantitative survey data, then using those results to inform a qualitative follow-up phase to explain and expand on results.ParticipantsPrimary care physicians in a family medicine department at an academic medical center responded to surveys (<i>n</i> = 38) and participated in interviews (<i>n</i> = 16).ApproachParticipants completed a survey concerning frequency and preferences about video visits, pros and cons of video visits, communication aspects, and sufficiency of the technology. A purposeful sample of participants completed semi-structured interviews about their virtual care experiences with a focus on equity for subpopulations.Key ResultsThe results indicated that physicians have observed equity issues for unique patient populations. The results add to the understanding of nuanced ways in which virtual care can increase and decrease healthcare access for unique populations. Patients with limited English proficiency were particularly affected by inequity in virtual care access.ConclusionAdditional research and interventions are needed to improve portal access for those with limited English proficiency. Improvements should focus on health system interventions that expand access without requiring increased patient burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"408-416"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equity in virtual care: A mixed methods study of perspectives from physicians.\",\"authors\":\"Timothy C Guetterman, Emily Koptyra, Olivia Ritchie, Liz B Marquis, Reema Kadri, Anna Laurie, Vg Vinod Vydiswaran, Jiazhao Li, Lindsay K Brown, Tiffany C Veinot, Lorraine R Buis\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1357633X231194382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundVirtual care expanded rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic, and how this shift affected healthcare disparities among subgroups of patients is of concern. Racial and ethnic minorities, older adults, individuals with less education, and lower-income households have lower rates of home broadband, smartphone ownership, and patient portal adoption, which may directly affect access to virtual care. Because primary care is a major access point to healthcare, perspectives of primary care providers are critical to inform the implementation of equitable virtual care.ObjectiveThe aim of this mixed methods study was to explore primary care physician experiences and perceptions of barriers and facilitators to equitable virtual care.DesignWe used an explanatory sequential mixed methods design, which consists of first collecting and analyzing quantitative survey data, then using those results to inform a qualitative follow-up phase to explain and expand on results.ParticipantsPrimary care physicians in a family medicine department at an academic medical center responded to surveys (<i>n</i> = 38) and participated in interviews (<i>n</i> = 16).ApproachParticipants completed a survey concerning frequency and preferences about video visits, pros and cons of video visits, communication aspects, and sufficiency of the technology. A purposeful sample of participants completed semi-structured interviews about their virtual care experiences with a focus on equity for subpopulations.Key ResultsThe results indicated that physicians have observed equity issues for unique patient populations. The results add to the understanding of nuanced ways in which virtual care can increase and decrease healthcare access for unique populations. Patients with limited English proficiency were particularly affected by inequity in virtual care access.ConclusionAdditional research and interventions are needed to improve portal access for those with limited English proficiency. Improvements should focus on health system interventions that expand access without requiring increased patient burden.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"408-416\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X231194382\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X231194382","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在COVID-19大流行期间,虚拟医疗迅速扩大,这种转变如何影响亚组患者之间的医疗保健差异令人关注。种族和少数民族、老年人、受教育程度较低的个人和低收入家庭的家庭宽带、智能手机拥有率和患者门户网站采用率较低,这可能直接影响虚拟医疗的获取。由于初级保健是医疗保健的主要接入点,初级保健提供者的观点对于为实施公平的虚拟保健提供信息至关重要。目的:这项混合方法研究的目的是探讨初级保健医生的经验和对公平虚拟护理障碍和促进因素的看法。设计:我们使用解释性顺序混合方法设计,首先收集和分析定量调查数据,然后使用这些结果通知定性后续阶段,以解释和扩展结果。参与者:某学术医疗中心家庭医学系的初级保健医生参与了调查(n = 38)和访谈(n = 16)。方法:参与者完成了一项关于视频访问的频率和偏好、视频访问的利弊、通信方面和技术充分性的调查。有目的的参与者样本完成了关于他们的虚拟护理经历的半结构化访谈,重点关注亚人群的公平性。关键结果:结果表明,医生已经观察到独特的患者群体的公平问题。结果增加了对虚拟护理可以增加和减少特定人群医疗保健访问的细微方式的理解。英语水平有限的患者尤其受到虚拟护理访问不公平的影响。结论:需要进一步的研究和干预措施来改善英语水平有限的人对门户网站的访问。改进工作应侧重于在不增加患者负担的情况下扩大可及性的卫生系统干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Equity in virtual care: A mixed methods study of perspectives from physicians.

BackgroundVirtual care expanded rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic, and how this shift affected healthcare disparities among subgroups of patients is of concern. Racial and ethnic minorities, older adults, individuals with less education, and lower-income households have lower rates of home broadband, smartphone ownership, and patient portal adoption, which may directly affect access to virtual care. Because primary care is a major access point to healthcare, perspectives of primary care providers are critical to inform the implementation of equitable virtual care.ObjectiveThe aim of this mixed methods study was to explore primary care physician experiences and perceptions of barriers and facilitators to equitable virtual care.DesignWe used an explanatory sequential mixed methods design, which consists of first collecting and analyzing quantitative survey data, then using those results to inform a qualitative follow-up phase to explain and expand on results.ParticipantsPrimary care physicians in a family medicine department at an academic medical center responded to surveys (n = 38) and participated in interviews (n = 16).ApproachParticipants completed a survey concerning frequency and preferences about video visits, pros and cons of video visits, communication aspects, and sufficiency of the technology. A purposeful sample of participants completed semi-structured interviews about their virtual care experiences with a focus on equity for subpopulations.Key ResultsThe results indicated that physicians have observed equity issues for unique patient populations. The results add to the understanding of nuanced ways in which virtual care can increase and decrease healthcare access for unique populations. Patients with limited English proficiency were particularly affected by inequity in virtual care access.ConclusionAdditional research and interventions are needed to improve portal access for those with limited English proficiency. Improvements should focus on health system interventions that expand access without requiring increased patient burden.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信